Police officer perceptions towards drug liberalization policies in the context of an overdose crisis in British Columbia, Canada

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Alissa Merielle Greer, Amanda Butler, Naomi Zakimi, Becca Wood
{"title":"Police officer perceptions towards drug liberalization policies in the context of an overdose crisis in British Columbia, Canada","authors":"Alissa Merielle Greer, Amanda Butler, Naomi Zakimi, Becca Wood","doi":"10.1080/09687637.2023.2260552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBackground British Columbia, Canada, is experiencing an overdose crisis that has pushed drug liberalization policies to the forefront of the response. This study examines police officers’ perceptions of enforcement and drug liberalization policies, including support for decriminalization and regulation or ‘safer supply’, in this context.Methods Qualitative interview data were collected in September-November 2020 from active police officers involved in drug law enforcement in British Columbia, prior to decriminalization reforms being introduced in the province. We conducted a thematic analysis of this data with a focus on police officer views towards drug enforcement and drug liberalization policies.Results Policing and reforms amid the overdose crisis has shaped officer perceptions and actions towards illegal drugs and drug policies. Although officers saw overdose as a health issue, these views coincided with a strong emphasis on supply-side policing, such as drug trafficking investigations. Policing continues to be entrenched in the overdose crisis, which has impacted the way police officers view drugs and drug use, particularly, their belief that current interventions to disrupt the illegal drug market are not working.Conclusion This study advances knowledge on the motivations for promoting drug enforcement, and enacting drug policies, in the context of an overdose crisis.Keywords: Drug law enforcementpolice officerspolice attitudesdrug liberalization policiesdecriminalizationoverdose crisis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) under Grant #24413; The William and Ada Isabelle Steel Fund under Grant #24836; Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar Award 2022","PeriodicalId":11367,"journal":{"name":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2023.2260552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractBackground British Columbia, Canada, is experiencing an overdose crisis that has pushed drug liberalization policies to the forefront of the response. This study examines police officers’ perceptions of enforcement and drug liberalization policies, including support for decriminalization and regulation or ‘safer supply’, in this context.Methods Qualitative interview data were collected in September-November 2020 from active police officers involved in drug law enforcement in British Columbia, prior to decriminalization reforms being introduced in the province. We conducted a thematic analysis of this data with a focus on police officer views towards drug enforcement and drug liberalization policies.Results Policing and reforms amid the overdose crisis has shaped officer perceptions and actions towards illegal drugs and drug policies. Although officers saw overdose as a health issue, these views coincided with a strong emphasis on supply-side policing, such as drug trafficking investigations. Policing continues to be entrenched in the overdose crisis, which has impacted the way police officers view drugs and drug use, particularly, their belief that current interventions to disrupt the illegal drug market are not working.Conclusion This study advances knowledge on the motivations for promoting drug enforcement, and enacting drug policies, in the context of an overdose crisis.Keywords: Drug law enforcementpolice officerspolice attitudesdrug liberalization policiesdecriminalizationoverdose crisis Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) under Grant #24413; The William and Ada Isabelle Steel Fund under Grant #24836; Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar Award 2022
在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省过量危机的背景下,警察对毒品自由化政策的看法
摘要背景加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省正在经历药物过量危机,这将药物自由化政策推到了应对措施的最前沿。在此背景下,本研究考察了警察对执法和毒品自由化政策的看法,包括对非刑事化和监管或“更安全供应”的支持。方法收集2020年9月至11月在不列颠哥伦比亚省实施非刑事化改革之前参与毒品执法的现役警察的定性访谈数据。我们对这些数据进行了专题分析,重点关注警察对毒品执法和毒品自由化政策的看法。结果过量危机中的警务和改革影响了官员对非法毒品和毒品政策的看法和行动。尽管警官们认为过量用药是一种健康问题,但这些观点与强调供应侧警务(如毒品贩运调查)的观点不谋而合。警务工作继续在过量危机中根深蒂固,这影响了警察看待毒品和吸毒的方式,特别是影响了他们认为目前扰乱非法毒品市场的干预措施不起作用。结论:在过量危机的背景下,本研究推进了促进药物执法和制定药物政策的动机方面的知识。关键词:禁毒执法警察警察态度毒品自由化政策非刑事化过量危机披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。社会科学与人文科学研究委员会(SSHRC)资助项目#24413;威廉和艾达·伊莎贝尔钢铁基金第24836号拨款;迈克尔·史密斯健康研究BC学者奖2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Drugs: education, prevention & policy is a refereed journal which aims to provide a forum for communication and debate between policy makers, practitioners and researchers concerned with social and health policy responses to legal and illicit drug use and drug-related harm. The journal publishes multi-disciplinary research papers, commentaries and reviews on policy, prevention and harm reduction issues regarding the use and misuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. It is journal policy to encourage submissions which reflect different cultural, historical and theoretical approaches to the development of policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信