Development and validation of a new self-assessment tool to measure professionalism among medical students

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Jin Yang Ho, Valerie Tuang, Desmond B Teo, Gominda Ponnamperuma
{"title":"Development and validation of a new self-assessment tool to measure professionalism among medical students","authors":"Jin Yang Ho, Valerie Tuang, Desmond B Teo, Gominda Ponnamperuma","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Professionalism is a key quality that medical students should possess, but it is difficult to define and assess. Current assessment tools have room for improvement. This study aimed to design and validate a self-assessment tool to assess professionalism among medical students. Method: A questionnaire was created based on 10 tenets of professionalism from the Charter on Medical Professionalism jointly published by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, American College of Physicians Foundation and European Federation of Internal Medicine, along with input from Singapore guides. The self-administered questionnaire was administered to Year 2 to 5 students from Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore in a voluntary, anonymised manner in the academic year of 2019/2020. Construct validity and internal reliability were evaluated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Results: There was a total of 541 respondents. After removing incomplete responses, 504 responses were included. Following PCA, a 17-item questionnaire, titled “Medical Professionalism: A Self-assessment Tool” (MPAST), with a 5-component solution was obtained. The 5 components were commitment to: (1) patient’s best interest, (2) honesty and integrity, (3) professional competency, (4) patient safety and care, and (5) educational responsibilities. Their Cronbach’s alpha value ranged from 0.540 to 0.714, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.777. Conclusion: MPAST is valid, reliable, practical, and is the first validated self-assessment tool to assess professional attributes and behaviours among medical students, to our knowledge.","PeriodicalId":50774,"journal":{"name":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Professionalism is a key quality that medical students should possess, but it is difficult to define and assess. Current assessment tools have room for improvement. This study aimed to design and validate a self-assessment tool to assess professionalism among medical students. Method: A questionnaire was created based on 10 tenets of professionalism from the Charter on Medical Professionalism jointly published by the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, American College of Physicians Foundation and European Federation of Internal Medicine, along with input from Singapore guides. The self-administered questionnaire was administered to Year 2 to 5 students from Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore in a voluntary, anonymised manner in the academic year of 2019/2020. Construct validity and internal reliability were evaluated using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Results: There was a total of 541 respondents. After removing incomplete responses, 504 responses were included. Following PCA, a 17-item questionnaire, titled “Medical Professionalism: A Self-assessment Tool” (MPAST), with a 5-component solution was obtained. The 5 components were commitment to: (1) patient’s best interest, (2) honesty and integrity, (3) professional competency, (4) patient safety and care, and (5) educational responsibilities. Their Cronbach’s alpha value ranged from 0.540 to 0.714, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.777. Conclusion: MPAST is valid, reliable, practical, and is the first validated self-assessment tool to assess professional attributes and behaviours among medical students, to our knowledge.
一种衡量医学生专业精神的新自我评估工具的开发与验证
专业精神是医学生应具备的一项重要素质,但很难界定和评估。目前的评估工具还有改进的余地。本研究旨在设计并验证医学生专业精神自我评量工具。方法:根据美国内科医学委员会基金会、美国医师学会基金会和欧洲内科医学联合会联合出版的《医学专业精神宪章》中的10条专业原则,以及新加坡指南的意见,制作了一份调查问卷。本问卷以2019/2020学年新加坡国立大学永禄林医学院二年级至五年级学生为对象,采用自愿、匿名方式进行问卷调查。结构效度和内部信度分别采用主成分分析(PCA)和Cronbach 's alpha进行评估。结果:调查对象541人。剔除不完整回复后,共纳入504份回复。采用主成分分析法,编制了一份包含17个条目的问卷,题目为“医学专业精神:一种自我评估工具”(MPAST),并采用五分量解。这5个组成部分是承诺:(1)患者的最大利益,(2)诚实和正直,(3)专业能力,(4)患者安全和护理,(5)教育责任。其Cronbach 's alpha值为0.540 ~ 0.714,总体Cronbach 's alpha值为0.777。结论:MPAST是一种有效、可靠、实用的自评工具,据我们所知,它是第一个经过验证的评估医学生职业属性和行为的自评工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals is the official journal of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. Established in 1972, Annals is the leading medical journal in Singapore which aims to publish novel findings from clinical research as well as medical practices that can benefit the medical community.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信