Investigating heterogeneity across autism, ADHD, and typical development using measures of cortical thickness, surface area, cortical/subcortical volume, and structural covariance
Younes Sadat-Nejad, Marlee M. Vandewouw, R. Cardy, J. Lerch, M. J. Taylor, A. Iaboni, C. Hammill, B. Syed, J. A. Brian, E. Kelley, M. Ayub, J. Crosbie, R. Schachar, S. Georgiades, R. Nicolson, E. Anagnostou, A. Kushki
{"title":"Investigating heterogeneity across autism, ADHD, and typical development using measures of cortical thickness, surface area, cortical/subcortical volume, and structural covariance","authors":"Younes Sadat-Nejad, Marlee M. Vandewouw, R. Cardy, J. Lerch, M. J. Taylor, A. Iaboni, C. Hammill, B. Syed, J. A. Brian, E. Kelley, M. Ayub, J. Crosbie, R. Schachar, S. Georgiades, R. Nicolson, E. Anagnostou, A. Kushki","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2023.1171337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism are multi-faceted neurodevelopmental conditions with limited biological markers. The clinical diagnoses of autism and ADHD are based on behavioural assessments and may not predict long-term outcomes or response to interventions and supports. To address this gap, data-driven methods can be used to discover groups of individuals with shared biological patterns. Methods In this study, we investigated measures derived from cortical/subcortical volume, surface area, cortical thickness, and structural covariance investigated of 565 participants with diagnoses of autism [ n = 262, median(IQR) age = 12.2(5.9), 22% female], and ADHD [ n = 171, median(IQR) age = 11.1(4.0), 21% female] as well neurotypical children [ n = 132, median(IQR) age = 12.1(6.7), 43% female]. We integrated cortical thickness, surface area, and cortical/subcortical volume, with a measure of single-participant structural covariance using a graph neural network approach. Results Our findings suggest two large clusters, which differed in measures of adaptive functioning ( χ 2 = 7.8, P = 0.004), inattention ( χ 2 = 11.169, P < 0.001), hyperactivity ( χ 2 = 18.44, P < 0.001), IQ ( χ 2 = 9.24, P = 0.002), age ( χ 2 = 70.87, P < 0.001), and sex ( χ 2 = 105.6, P < 0.001). Discussion These clusters did not align with existing diagnostic labels, suggesting that brain structure is more likely to be associated with differences in adaptive functioning, IQ, and ADHD features.","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1171337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism are multi-faceted neurodevelopmental conditions with limited biological markers. The clinical diagnoses of autism and ADHD are based on behavioural assessments and may not predict long-term outcomes or response to interventions and supports. To address this gap, data-driven methods can be used to discover groups of individuals with shared biological patterns. Methods In this study, we investigated measures derived from cortical/subcortical volume, surface area, cortical thickness, and structural covariance investigated of 565 participants with diagnoses of autism [ n = 262, median(IQR) age = 12.2(5.9), 22% female], and ADHD [ n = 171, median(IQR) age = 11.1(4.0), 21% female] as well neurotypical children [ n = 132, median(IQR) age = 12.1(6.7), 43% female]. We integrated cortical thickness, surface area, and cortical/subcortical volume, with a measure of single-participant structural covariance using a graph neural network approach. Results Our findings suggest two large clusters, which differed in measures of adaptive functioning ( χ 2 = 7.8, P = 0.004), inattention ( χ 2 = 11.169, P < 0.001), hyperactivity ( χ 2 = 18.44, P < 0.001), IQ ( χ 2 = 9.24, P = 0.002), age ( χ 2 = 70.87, P < 0.001), and sex ( χ 2 = 105.6, P < 0.001). Discussion These clusters did not align with existing diagnostic labels, suggesting that brain structure is more likely to be associated with differences in adaptive functioning, IQ, and ADHD features.