Do Public Health Service Characteristics Matter? Exploring the Make-or-Buy Decision in Local Health Departments

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Tianshu (Tina) Zhao
{"title":"Do Public Health Service Characteristics Matter? Exploring the Make-or-Buy Decision in Local Health Departments","authors":"Tianshu (Tina) Zhao","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2023.2270499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractPublic health services can be provided by local health departments (LHDs) or external contractors. This study aims to determine which characteristics of public health services, if any, influence the contracting out decision in local health departments. The transaction cost approach, market failure theory, and government failure theory provide theoretical frameworks for how two characteristics of public health services—asset specificity and service measurability—could impact the decision to make or buy in local health departments. This study employs a multinomial logistic regression model for analysis and uses multiple data sources. The findings suggest that public health agencies are less likely to deliver services internally at low and high levels of transaction costs, while more likely to produce services in-house at moderate levels of transaction costs. Furthermore, for services that are difficult to measure vendor performance, LHDs are less likely to choose complete contracting.Keywords: Contractinghealth carelocal health departmentoutsourcingmake-or-buypublic health Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available in https://www.naccho.org/resources/lhd-research/national-profile-of-local-health-departments.Notes1 To mitigate dropout bias, we took several measures. Initially, the survey underwent a pretesting phase involving two colleagues, which enabled us to enhance the questionnaire’s clarity. Additionally, we sent out reminder emails after the first invitation email, emphasizing the significance of participants’ input and the compensation offered for their time. We received some auto responses indicating that individuals were out of the office and unavailable for contact, due to reasons such as summer vacation, job transitions, or retirement, during the four-week survey window (late June to late July 2023). Ultimately, 24 public health experts participated in the survey, with 20 completing the questionnaire. Despite including only 39 out of 85 services, the questionnaire spans eight pages and has sixteen questions. As a results, dropouts occurred during the survey. Two individuals discontinued at Question 2 (screening for disease/conditions). One participant dropped out during Question 4 (maternal and child health). And one respondent exited the survey at Question 5 (other health services). In general, we’ve taken efforts to make more people respond and lessen the dropout bias.Additional informationNotes on contributorsTianshu (Tina) ZhaoTianshu (Tina) Zhao is an Assistant Professor of Public Policy and Administration at California State University Long Beach. Her research focuses on public and nonprofit management, local health department management, health policy, government contracting, multi-sector collaboration, and survey methodology.","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2270499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractPublic health services can be provided by local health departments (LHDs) or external contractors. This study aims to determine which characteristics of public health services, if any, influence the contracting out decision in local health departments. The transaction cost approach, market failure theory, and government failure theory provide theoretical frameworks for how two characteristics of public health services—asset specificity and service measurability—could impact the decision to make or buy in local health departments. This study employs a multinomial logistic regression model for analysis and uses multiple data sources. The findings suggest that public health agencies are less likely to deliver services internally at low and high levels of transaction costs, while more likely to produce services in-house at moderate levels of transaction costs. Furthermore, for services that are difficult to measure vendor performance, LHDs are less likely to choose complete contracting.Keywords: Contractinghealth carelocal health departmentoutsourcingmake-or-buypublic health Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available in https://www.naccho.org/resources/lhd-research/national-profile-of-local-health-departments.Notes1 To mitigate dropout bias, we took several measures. Initially, the survey underwent a pretesting phase involving two colleagues, which enabled us to enhance the questionnaire’s clarity. Additionally, we sent out reminder emails after the first invitation email, emphasizing the significance of participants’ input and the compensation offered for their time. We received some auto responses indicating that individuals were out of the office and unavailable for contact, due to reasons such as summer vacation, job transitions, or retirement, during the four-week survey window (late June to late July 2023). Ultimately, 24 public health experts participated in the survey, with 20 completing the questionnaire. Despite including only 39 out of 85 services, the questionnaire spans eight pages and has sixteen questions. As a results, dropouts occurred during the survey. Two individuals discontinued at Question 2 (screening for disease/conditions). One participant dropped out during Question 4 (maternal and child health). And one respondent exited the survey at Question 5 (other health services). In general, we’ve taken efforts to make more people respond and lessen the dropout bias.Additional informationNotes on contributorsTianshu (Tina) ZhaoTianshu (Tina) Zhao is an Assistant Professor of Public Policy and Administration at California State University Long Beach. Her research focuses on public and nonprofit management, local health department management, health policy, government contracting, multi-sector collaboration, and survey methodology.
公共卫生服务的特点重要吗?地方卫生部门“买还是做”决策探析
公共卫生服务可以由地方卫生部门(lhd)或外部承包商提供。本研究旨在确定公共卫生服务的哪些特征(如果有的话)会影响地方卫生部门的外包决策。交易成本方法、市场失灵理论和政府失灵理论为公共卫生服务的两个特征——资产专用性和服务可测量性——如何影响当地卫生部门的决策提供了理论框架。本研究采用多项逻辑回归模型进行分析,并使用多个数据来源。研究结果表明,公共卫生机构不太可能以低交易成本和高交易成本在内部提供服务,而更有可能以中等交易成本在内部提供服务。此外,对于难以衡量供应商绩效的服务,lhd不太可能选择完全承包。关键词:承包卫生保健地方卫生部门外包生产或购买公共卫生信息披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可在https://www.naccho.org/resources/lhd-research/national-profile-of-local-health-departments.Notes1中获得,为了减轻退出偏倚,我们采取了一些措施。最初,调查经过了两个同事参与的预测试阶段,这使我们能够提高问卷的清晰度。此外,我们在第一封邀请邮件之后发送了提醒邮件,强调参与者投入的重要性和对他们时间的补偿。在为期四周的调查期间(2023年6月下旬至7月下旬),我们收到了一些自动回复,表明由于暑假、工作转换或退休等原因,个人不在办公室,无法联系。最终,24名公共卫生专家参与了调查,其中20人完成了问卷调查。尽管这份调查问卷只包括了85项服务中的39项,但它长达8页,有16个问题。因此,在调查期间出现了退学现象。2人在问题2(疾病/状况筛查)时停止工作。1名与会者在问题4(妇幼保健)期间退出。一名受访者在问题5(其他卫生服务)处退出了调查。总的来说,我们已经努力让更多的人做出回应,减少对辍学者的偏见。赵天舒(Tina)赵天舒(Tina)是加州州立大学长滩分校公共政策与管理助理教授。她的研究重点是公共和非营利组织管理、地方卫生部门管理、卫生政策、政府合同、多部门合作和调查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
16.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信