Coercion via Eminent Domain and Legal Fees: The Acceptance of Gas Extraction in West Virginia

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Martina Angela Caretta, Erin Brock Carlson
{"title":"Coercion via Eminent Domain and Legal Fees: The Acceptance of Gas Extraction in West Virginia","authors":"Martina Angela Caretta, Erin Brock Carlson","doi":"10.1089/env.2021.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Residents in Central Appalachia face the emotional, physical, and financial impacts of the energy independence goal that the United States has been pursuing for the past several decades. In this region, extractive industries have historically been supported by powerful energy lobbies, tax breaks, and legislation that disregard environmental protections, resulting in the construction of a reticular energy infrastructure across Appalachia. We investigate this neoliberal policy environment by sharing the experiences of West Virginian residents living along gas pipelines, gathered via walk-along interviews and photovoice. Two main legal and economic pressures, the extensive legal fees needed to fight efforts to build natural gas pipelines on private land and the threat of eminent domain, emerge from our findings. Using the lens of environmental justice, we show how neoliberal policies strongly endorsed and supported by the state, combined with a deeply rooted nostalgia for energy development, have positioned West Virginia as a site of acceptance for unconventional energy extraction. Ultimately, we argue that neoliberalism has brought about legal and economic stressors that force many West Virginia landowners to accept extraction and its many byproducts.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Residents in Central Appalachia face the emotional, physical, and financial impacts of the energy independence goal that the United States has been pursuing for the past several decades. In this region, extractive industries have historically been supported by powerful energy lobbies, tax breaks, and legislation that disregard environmental protections, resulting in the construction of a reticular energy infrastructure across Appalachia. We investigate this neoliberal policy environment by sharing the experiences of West Virginian residents living along gas pipelines, gathered via walk-along interviews and photovoice. Two main legal and economic pressures, the extensive legal fees needed to fight efforts to build natural gas pipelines on private land and the threat of eminent domain, emerge from our findings. Using the lens of environmental justice, we show how neoliberal policies strongly endorsed and supported by the state, combined with a deeply rooted nostalgia for energy development, have positioned West Virginia as a site of acceptance for unconventional energy extraction. Ultimately, we argue that neoliberalism has brought about legal and economic stressors that force many West Virginia landowners to accept extraction and its many byproducts.
通过征用权和法律费用的强制:西弗吉尼亚州天然气开采的接受
阿巴拉契亚中部的居民面临着美国过去几十年来一直追求的能源独立目标带来的情感、身体和经济上的影响。在这个地区,采掘业历来受到强大的能源游说团体、税收减免和无视环境保护的立法的支持,导致在整个阿巴拉契亚地区建设了网状的能源基础设施。我们通过分享居住在天然气管道沿线的西弗吉尼亚州居民的经验,通过行走访谈和照片语音收集,来调查这种新自由主义的政策环境。两个主要的法律和经济压力,即反对在私有土地上修建天然气管道所需的大量法律费用和征用权的威胁,从我们的调查结果中浮现出来。利用环境正义的镜头,我们展示了新自由主义政策是如何得到国家的大力支持和支持的,再加上对能源开发的根深蒂固的怀念,使西弗吉尼亚州成为接受非常规能源开采的地方。最终,我们认为新自由主义带来了法律和经济压力,迫使许多西弗吉尼亚州的土地所有者接受开采及其许多副产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信