Influence of foot strike patterns and cadences on patellofemoral joint stress in male runners with patellofemoral pain

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Zhen Wei , Xihe Hou , Yujie Qi , Lin Wang
{"title":"Influence of foot strike patterns and cadences on patellofemoral joint stress in male runners with patellofemoral pain","authors":"Zhen Wei ,&nbsp;Xihe Hou ,&nbsp;Yujie Qi ,&nbsp;Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to determine the effect of foot strike patterns and cadences in male runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Biomechanics lab.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>20 male runners with PFP were instructed to randomly complete six running conditions (three cadence conditions in rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) or forefoot strike (FFS)) under a preferred running speed.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were peak knee joint and moment, and secondary outcomes were patellofemoral joint stress.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Running with increased cadence has a lower flexion angle (P = 0.027, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.45), lower extension moment (P = 0.011, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.29), lower internal rotation moment (P = 0.040, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.17), lower patellofemoral stress (P = 0.029, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.52) than preferred cadence. FFS running performed significantly lower flexion angle (P = 0.003, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.39), lower extension moment (P &lt; 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.91), lower adduction moment (P = 0.020, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.25) lower patellofemoral stress (P &lt; 0.001, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.81) than RFS running for all cadence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preliminary findings provide new perspectives for male runners with PFP to unload patellofemoral joint stress in managing PFP through the combination of the FFS pattern and increased cadence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001323/pdfft?md5=45285481c3240ff9e8db7f9b3148b0e6&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X23001323-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the effect of foot strike patterns and cadences in male runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Biomechanics lab.

Methods

20 male runners with PFP were instructed to randomly complete six running conditions (three cadence conditions in rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) or forefoot strike (FFS)) under a preferred running speed.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcomes were peak knee joint and moment, and secondary outcomes were patellofemoral joint stress.

Results

Running with increased cadence has a lower flexion angle (P = 0.027, η2 = 0.45), lower extension moment (P = 0.011, η2 = 0.29), lower internal rotation moment (P = 0.040, η2 = 0.17), lower patellofemoral stress (P = 0.029, η2 = 0.52) than preferred cadence. FFS running performed significantly lower flexion angle (P = 0.003, η2 = 0.39), lower extension moment (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.91), lower adduction moment (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.25) lower patellofemoral stress (P < 0.001, η2 = 0.81) than RFS running for all cadence.

Conclusions

Preliminary findings provide new perspectives for male runners with PFP to unload patellofemoral joint stress in managing PFP through the combination of the FFS pattern and increased cadence.

脚部击打方式和节奏对男性跑步者髌骨股骨关节应力的影响
本研究旨在确定男性跑步者髌骨股痛(PFP)的足部击打模式和节奏的影响。横断面研究。生物力学实验室。20名患有PFP的男性跑步者被要求在一个首选的跑步速度下随机完成六种跑步条件(三种后脚着地模式(RFS)或前脚着地模式(FFS)的节奏条件)。主要指标为膝关节峰值和弯矩,次要指标为髌股关节应力。与优选配速相比,提高配速跑步的屈曲角(P = 0.027, η2 = 0.45)、伸展力矩(P = 0.011, η2 = 0.29)、内旋力矩(P = 0.040, η2 = 0.17)、髌骨应力(P = 0.029, η2 = 0.52)较低。在所有节奏下,FFS跑均比RFS跑表现出更低的屈曲角(P = 0.003, η2 = 0.39)、更低的伸力矩(P < 0.001, η2 = 0.91)、更低的内收力矩(P = 0.020, η2 = 0.25)和更低的髌骨应力(P < 0.001, η2 = 0.81)。初步研究结果为患有PFP的男性跑步者通过结合FFS模式和增加节奏来减轻PFP的髌股关节应力提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信