Electric Power Resilience: Is More Better?

Kenneth W. Costello
{"title":"Electric Power Resilience: Is More Better?","authors":"Kenneth W. Costello","doi":"10.1002/gas.22375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Can we spend too much on transportation and occupational safety, pollution abatement and climate change mitigation? The answer for many, including climate activists, regulators, politicians, and policymakers, is “of course we can't.” How can one doubt that these activities are socially desirable, especially when they could help to avoid cataclysmic outcomes? For an economist, however, it is not so farfetched to think that we can spend too much. The simple Econ 101 explanation is that, at the margin, the additional benefits fall short of the additional costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"40 5","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gas.22375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can we spend too much on transportation and occupational safety, pollution abatement and climate change mitigation? The answer for many, including climate activists, regulators, politicians, and policymakers, is “of course we can't.” How can one doubt that these activities are socially desirable, especially when they could help to avoid cataclysmic outcomes? For an economist, however, it is not so farfetched to think that we can spend too much. The simple Econ 101 explanation is that, at the margin, the additional benefits fall short of the additional costs.

电力弹性:越多越好吗?
我们在交通和职业安全、减少污染和减缓气候变化方面是否会投入过多?包括气候活动家、监管机构、政治家和政策制定者在内的许多人的答案是“我们当然不能”。人们怎么能怀疑这些活动在社会上是可取的,尤其是当它们有助于避免灾难性后果的时候?然而,对于一个经济学家来说,认为我们可以过度消费的想法并不是那么牵强。简单的经济学101解释是,在边际上,额外的收益低于额外的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信