Perspectives on Data Sharing in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Freda M. Warner, Bobo Tong, Jessie McDougall, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Alexander G. Rabchevsky, Jacquelyn J. Cragg, John L.K. Kramer
{"title":"Perspectives on Data Sharing in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury","authors":"Freda M. Warner, Bobo Tong, Jessie McDougall, Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, Alexander G. Rabchevsky, Jacquelyn J. Cragg, John L.K. Kramer","doi":"10.1089/neur.2023.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open data sharing of clinical research aims to improve transparency and support novel scientific discoveries. There are also risks, including participant identification and the potential for stigmatization. The perspectives of persons participating in research are needed to inform open data-sharing policies. The aim of the current study was to determine perspectives on data sharing in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), including risks and benefits, and types of data people are most willing to share. A secondary aim was to examine predictors of willingness to share data. Persons with SCIs in the United States and Canada completed a survey developed and disseminated through various channels, including our community partner, the North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium. The study collected data from 232 participants, with 52.2% from Canada and 42.2% from the United States, and the majority completed the survey in English. Most participants had previously participated in research and had been living with an SCI for ≥5 years. Overall, most participants reported that the potential benefits of data sharing outweighed the negatives, with persons with SCI seen as the most trustworthy partners for data sharing. The highest levels of concern were that information could be stolen and companies might use the information for marketing purposes. Persons with SCI were generally supportive of data sharing for research purposes. Clinical trials should consider including a statement on open data sharing in informed consents to better acknowledge the contribution of research participants in future studies.","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open data sharing of clinical research aims to improve transparency and support novel scientific discoveries. There are also risks, including participant identification and the potential for stigmatization. The perspectives of persons participating in research are needed to inform open data-sharing policies. The aim of the current study was to determine perspectives on data sharing in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), including risks and benefits, and types of data people are most willing to share. A secondary aim was to examine predictors of willingness to share data. Persons with SCIs in the United States and Canada completed a survey developed and disseminated through various channels, including our community partner, the North American Spinal Cord Injury Consortium. The study collected data from 232 participants, with 52.2% from Canada and 42.2% from the United States, and the majority completed the survey in English. Most participants had previously participated in research and had been living with an SCI for ≥5 years. Overall, most participants reported that the potential benefits of data sharing outweighed the negatives, with persons with SCI seen as the most trustworthy partners for data sharing. The highest levels of concern were that information could be stolen and companies might use the information for marketing purposes. Persons with SCI were generally supportive of data sharing for research purposes. Clinical trials should consider including a statement on open data sharing in informed consents to better acknowledge the contribution of research participants in future studies.
脊髓损伤患者数据共享的展望
临床研究的开放数据共享旨在提高透明度并支持新的科学发现。也存在风险,包括参与者身份识别和污名化的可能性。参与研究人员的观点需要为开放数据共享政策提供信息。当前研究的目的是确定脊髓损伤(SCI)患者数据共享的观点,包括风险和收益,以及人们最愿意共享的数据类型。第二个目的是检验共享数据意愿的预测因素。美国和加拿大的脊髓损伤患者完成了一项调查,该调查通过各种渠道进行了开发和传播,包括我们的社区合作伙伴北美脊髓损伤协会。该研究收集了232名参与者的数据,其中52.2%来自加拿大,42.2%来自美国,大多数人用英语完成了调查。大多数参与者以前参加过研究,并且患有SCI≥5年。总体而言,大多数参与者报告说,数据共享的潜在好处大于坏处,SCI患者被视为数据共享最值得信赖的伙伴。最令人担忧的是,信息可能被盗,公司可能将这些信息用于营销目的。SCI患者通常支持为研究目的共享数据。临床试验应考虑在知情同意书中加入关于开放数据共享的声明,以更好地承认研究参与者在未来研究中的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信