Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jacky J. Forsyth
{"title":"Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"Jacky J. Forsyth","doi":"10.4103/jmh.jmh_27_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility for postmenopausal women of a bone-strengthening jumping intervention, which has been previously successful for premenopausal women. Materials and Methods: Forty-nine participants (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age = 57.8 ± 4.3 years) were randomized into either an exercise intervention or sham-control group in a double-blinded fashion. The intervention consisted of 10 maximal, rest-inserted countermovement jumps, performed three times a week on a hard surface without shoes for 8 months. Sham-control participants performed unilateral balance exercises of equivalent duration. Results: The jumps were well tolerated, with women in the jumping group completing 95% of the prescribed exercise. Of the participants who completed the study ( n = 23 intervention, n = 16 control), there were no significant differences in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneum within and between groups (mean ± SD BUA = 64.9 ± 7.3 and 66.6 ± 6.5 dB/MHz for intervention pre- and post-trial, respectively, versus mean ± SD BUA = 63.6 ± 4.2 and 64.4 ± 4.5 dB/MHz for sham-controls pre- and post-trial, respectively) or for any QUS parameters, although there was a 3% increase in BUA for intervention participants. Conclusions: Recruitment and participation rates were feasible for this duration of study and the exercise was acceptable. For a future study of this nature, 48 participants would be required to ensure adequate power, especially as lifestyle variations and post-menopausal hypoestrogenism prevent substantial gains in bone strength with high-impact exercise.","PeriodicalId":37717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mid-life Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mid-life Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_27_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility for postmenopausal women of a bone-strengthening jumping intervention, which has been previously successful for premenopausal women. Materials and Methods: Forty-nine participants (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age = 57.8 ± 4.3 years) were randomized into either an exercise intervention or sham-control group in a double-blinded fashion. The intervention consisted of 10 maximal, rest-inserted countermovement jumps, performed three times a week on a hard surface without shoes for 8 months. Sham-control participants performed unilateral balance exercises of equivalent duration. Results: The jumps were well tolerated, with women in the jumping group completing 95% of the prescribed exercise. Of the participants who completed the study ( n = 23 intervention, n = 16 control), there were no significant differences in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneum within and between groups (mean ± SD BUA = 64.9 ± 7.3 and 66.6 ± 6.5 dB/MHz for intervention pre- and post-trial, respectively, versus mean ± SD BUA = 63.6 ± 4.2 and 64.4 ± 4.5 dB/MHz for sham-controls pre- and post-trial, respectively) or for any QUS parameters, although there was a 3% increase in BUA for intervention participants. Conclusions: Recruitment and participation rates were feasible for this duration of study and the exercise was acceptable. For a future study of this nature, 48 participants would be required to ensure adequate power, especially as lifestyle variations and post-menopausal hypoestrogenism prevent substantial gains in bone strength with high-impact exercise.
绝经期骨质疏松和骨质干预使用生活方式运动:一项随机对照研究
背景:本研究的目的是检查绝经后妇女进行骨强化跳跃干预的可行性,该干预先前在绝经前妇女中取得了成功。材料与方法:49名参与者(平均±标准差[SD]年龄= 57.8±4.3岁)采用双盲法随机分为运动干预组和假对照组。干预包括10个最大的,休息插入的反向动作跳跃,每周进行三次,在坚硬的表面上不穿鞋,持续8个月。假对照组的参与者进行了同等时间的单侧平衡练习。结果:跳高组的女性接受程度良好,跳高组的女性完成了95%的规定运动。参与者完成了研究(n = 23干预,n = 16控制),没有明显差异在宽带超声衰减(BUA)使用定量超声(屈原)跟骨内和组间(均值±SD BUA = 64.9±7.3,66.6±6.5 dB / MHz干预前和试验后,分别与均值±SD BUA = 63.6±4.2,64.4±4.5 dB / MHz sham-controls预处理和试验后,分别)或任何什么参数,尽管干预参与者的BUA增加了3%。结论:在这段研究期间,招募率和参与率是可行的,训练是可以接受的。对于这一性质的未来研究,需要48名参与者来确保足够的力量,特别是生活方式的变化和绝经后雌激素水平低下会阻碍高强度运动对骨骼强度的实质性提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mid-life Health
Journal of Mid-life Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of mid-life health is the official journal of the Indian Menopause society published Quarterly in January, April, July and October. It is peer reviewed, scientific journal of mid-life health and its problems. It includes all aspects of mid-life health, preventive as well as curative. The journal publishes on subjects such as gynecology, neurology, geriatrics, psychiatry, endocrinology, urology, andrology, psychology, healthy ageing, cardiovascular health, bone health, quality of life etc. as relevant of men and women in their midlife. The Journal provides a visible platform to the researchers as well as clinicians to publish their experiences in this area thereby helping in the promotion of mid-life health leading to healthy ageing, growing need due to increasing life expectancy. The Editorial team has maintained high standards and published original research papers, case reports and review articles from the best of the best contributors both national & international, consistently so that now, it has become a great tool in the hands of menopause practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信