Foraging is prioritized over nestmate rescue in desert ants and pupae are rescued more than adults

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Adi Bar, Tomer Gilad, Doaa Massad, Asaph Ferber, Dan Ben-Ezra, Daniela Segal, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf
{"title":"Foraging is prioritized over nestmate rescue in desert ants and pupae are rescued more than adults","authors":"Adi Bar, Tomer Gilad, Doaa Massad, Asaph Ferber, Dan Ben-Ezra, Daniela Segal, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arad083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Social animals, and ants, in particular, exhibit a range of cooperative behaviors. One such behavior is the rescue of group members, which cannot return to the nest by themselves. However, if several group members need to be rescued, how do ants prioritize whom to save first? Furthermore, when food is offered in parallel, do ants prioritize feeding over rescuing? We studied the rescue behavior of the desert ant Cataglyphis niger. Workers invest more time in rescuing pupae than adult workers, perhaps because the value of brood is higher than that of older workers serving as foragers. Specific rescue behaviors, pulling the trapped individual or digging around it, differed when directed toward adults or pupae: rescuing workers more often pulled pupae whereas they dug more around trapped adults. Rescuing workers did not prioritize living individuals over dead ones or intact workers over injured ones indicating that trapped individuals were recognized chemically rather than by their morphology or behavior. Finally, workers prioritized foraging over rescuing, perhaps because fewer workers specialize in rescue behavior than in foraging. Our analysis indeed revealed that fewer workers both foraged and rescued trapped workers than expected by chance. In conclusion, ants that rescue others exhibit a complex set of behaviors, with varying attention and specific behaviors targeted at different individuals, perhaps according to the colony’s needs. Our study is important for emphasizing a relatively neglected aspect of sociality (rescue of group members) and demonstrates that the attentions of rescues differ based on the trapped nestmate’s life stage.","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Social animals, and ants, in particular, exhibit a range of cooperative behaviors. One such behavior is the rescue of group members, which cannot return to the nest by themselves. However, if several group members need to be rescued, how do ants prioritize whom to save first? Furthermore, when food is offered in parallel, do ants prioritize feeding over rescuing? We studied the rescue behavior of the desert ant Cataglyphis niger. Workers invest more time in rescuing pupae than adult workers, perhaps because the value of brood is higher than that of older workers serving as foragers. Specific rescue behaviors, pulling the trapped individual or digging around it, differed when directed toward adults or pupae: rescuing workers more often pulled pupae whereas they dug more around trapped adults. Rescuing workers did not prioritize living individuals over dead ones or intact workers over injured ones indicating that trapped individuals were recognized chemically rather than by their morphology or behavior. Finally, workers prioritized foraging over rescuing, perhaps because fewer workers specialize in rescue behavior than in foraging. Our analysis indeed revealed that fewer workers both foraged and rescued trapped workers than expected by chance. In conclusion, ants that rescue others exhibit a complex set of behaviors, with varying attention and specific behaviors targeted at different individuals, perhaps according to the colony’s needs. Our study is important for emphasizing a relatively neglected aspect of sociality (rescue of group members) and demonstrates that the attentions of rescues differ based on the trapped nestmate’s life stage.
在沙漠蚂蚁中,觅食优先于拯救巢穴,蛹比成年蚂蚁更容易获救
社会性动物,尤其是蚂蚁,表现出一系列的合作行为。其中一种行为是拯救不能自己返回巢穴的群体成员。然而,如果有几个群体成员需要救助,蚂蚁如何优先救助谁?此外,当同时提供食物时,蚂蚁会优先考虑进食而不是救援吗?我们研究了沙漠蚂蚁的救援行为。工蜂比成年工蜂花更多的时间抢救蛹,可能是因为孵出的幼虫比充当觅食者的老工蜂更有价值。具体的救援行为,拉动被困个体或在其周围挖掘,在针对成虫或蛹时有所不同:救援工人更多地拉动蛹,而他们更多地在被困成虫周围挖掘。救援人员并没有优先考虑活着的人而不是死去的人,也没有优先考虑完好无损的人而不是受伤的人,这表明被困的人是通过化学方式而不是通过形态或行为来识别的。最后,工蚁优先考虑觅食而不是救援,这可能是因为专门从事救援行为的工蚁比专门从事觅食的工蚁要少。我们的分析确实表明,觅食和营救被困工人的工人比偶然预期的要少。总之,拯救其他蚂蚁的蚂蚁表现出一套复杂的行为,可能根据群体的需要,对不同个体有不同的注意力和特定的行为。我们的研究强调了社会性的一个相对被忽视的方面(群体成员的救援),并证明了救援的关注是根据被困鸟巢的生命阶段而不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信