Maximal Respiratory Mouth Pressures Assessment in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Southwest Nigeria

Oluwafunmilayo Oguntoye, Gregory Erhabor, Olufemi Adewole, Olayemi Awopeju, Bolanle Adefuye, Eruke Egbagbe, Temitope Kolawole, Oluwatosin Oguntoye, Abidemi Fasae, Paul Olowoyo, Azeez Ibrahim, Adenike Arawomo, Oluwatosin Jeeged, Olumuyiwa Ariyo
{"title":"Maximal Respiratory Mouth Pressures Assessment in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Southwest Nigeria","authors":"Oluwafunmilayo Oguntoye, Gregory Erhabor, Olufemi Adewole, Olayemi Awopeju, Bolanle Adefuye, Eruke Egbagbe, Temitope Kolawole, Oluwatosin Oguntoye, Abidemi Fasae, Paul Olowoyo, Azeez Ibrahim, Adenike Arawomo, Oluwatosin Jeeged, Olumuyiwa Ariyo","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to assess the respiratory muscle strength in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, via measuring maximal respiratory mouth pressures [maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax)] to determine its association with disease severity and quality of life.Material and Methods: The study was a cross-sectional comparative study. A hundred and forty subjects (70 COPD patients and 70 controls) were recruited. Measurements of PImax, PEmax and spirometry were then performed. The health-related quality of life, severity of obstruction and dyspnea in the COPD patients were assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV 1) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, respectively. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 25.0 (SPSS IL USA.).Results: The mean (±S.D.) PImax and PEmax of the COPD patients (31.78±14.40 cmH2O and 54.80±18.89 cmH2O, respectively) were significantly lower (p<0.001) than the controls (80.40±7.50 cmH2O and 95.44±12.52 cmH2O, respectively). Both the PImax and PEmax correlated positively with the FEV1 of the COPD patients (r=0.658 and 0.534, respectively, p<0.001). The PImax and PEmax decreased as the mMRC dyspnea grade worsened (p<0.001). There was a negative correlation between PImax; PEmax and the CAT score of the COPD patients (r=-0.704 and–0.583, respectively, p<0.001).Conclusion: There was significant respiratory muscle weakness in the COPD patients compared with the controls. The respiratory muscle weakness worsened as the airflow obstruction and dyspnea worsened. Respiratory muscle weakness may also add to the negative impact COPD has on the health status of COPD patients.","PeriodicalId":93205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the respiratory muscle strength in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, via measuring maximal respiratory mouth pressures [maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax)] to determine its association with disease severity and quality of life.Material and Methods: The study was a cross-sectional comparative study. A hundred and forty subjects (70 COPD patients and 70 controls) were recruited. Measurements of PImax, PEmax and spirometry were then performed. The health-related quality of life, severity of obstruction and dyspnea in the COPD patients were assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV 1) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, respectively. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 25.0 (SPSS IL USA.).Results: The mean (±S.D.) PImax and PEmax of the COPD patients (31.78±14.40 cmH2O and 54.80±18.89 cmH2O, respectively) were significantly lower (p<0.001) than the controls (80.40±7.50 cmH2O and 95.44±12.52 cmH2O, respectively). Both the PImax and PEmax correlated positively with the FEV1 of the COPD patients (r=0.658 and 0.534, respectively, p<0.001). The PImax and PEmax decreased as the mMRC dyspnea grade worsened (p<0.001). There was a negative correlation between PImax; PEmax and the CAT score of the COPD patients (r=-0.704 and–0.583, respectively, p<0.001).Conclusion: There was significant respiratory muscle weakness in the COPD patients compared with the controls. The respiratory muscle weakness worsened as the airflow obstruction and dyspnea worsened. Respiratory muscle weakness may also add to the negative impact COPD has on the health status of COPD patients.
尼日利亚西南部某三级医院稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的最大呼吸口压评估
目的:本研究旨在通过测量最大呼吸口压[最大吸气压(PImax)和最大呼气压(PEmax)]来评估稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的呼吸肌力量,以确定其与疾病严重程度和生活质量的关系。材料与方法:本研究为横断面比较研究。招募了140名受试者(70名COPD患者和70名对照组)。然后进行PImax、PEmax和肺活量测定。COPD患者的健康相关生活质量、梗阻严重程度和呼吸困难分别采用COPD评估试验(CAT)、支气管扩张剂后1秒用力呼气量(FEV 1)和改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表进行评估。数据分析使用SPSS 25.0版本(SPSS IL USA.)。结果:平均(±S.D.)COPD患者的PImax和PEmax(分别为31.78±14.40 cmH2O和54.80±18.89 cmH2O)显著低于对照组(分别为80.40±7.50 cmH2O和95.44±12.52 cmH2O) (p < 0.001)。PImax和PEmax与COPD患者FEV1呈正相关(r分别为0.658和0.534,p<0.001)。pmax和pmax随mMRC呼吸困难等级加重而降低(p<0.001)。pmax与pmax呈负相关;PEmax与COPD患者CAT评分的相关性(r=-0.704、0.583,p<0.001)。结论:COPD患者与对照组相比存在明显的呼吸肌无力。随着气流阻塞和呼吸困难的加重,呼吸肌无力加重。呼吸肌无力也可能增加COPD对COPD患者健康状况的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信