PERBANDINGAN ANTARA SISTEM PEMILU PROPORSIONAL TERBUKA DAN TERTUTUP DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS MENUJU PENYELENGGARAAN YANG LEBIH BAIK

John Kenedy Azis, Irene Eka Sihombing
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN ANTARA SISTEM PEMILU PROPORSIONAL TERBUKA DAN TERTUTUP DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS MENUJU PENYELENGGARAAN YANG LEBIH BAIK","authors":"John Kenedy Azis, Irene Eka Sihombing","doi":"10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electoral system is a crucial aspect in maintaining democracy and political participation in a country. In Indonesia, the debate regarding open and closed electoral systems continues. This article aims to analyze the comparison between these two electoral systems, focusing on their respective advantages and disadvantages. The research method employed is a comparative analysis, gathering data through literature review and analysis of elections in Indonesia. The analysis reveals that the open electoral system is more proportional, as it excels in expanding public participation, enhancing political representation, and strengthening party accountability. However, challenges in vote calculation and potential vote splitting still need to be addressed. In conclusion, this article argues that the open electoral system is more proportional compared to the closed system and holds the potential to enhance political participation in Indonesian society","PeriodicalId":497705,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electoral system is a crucial aspect in maintaining democracy and political participation in a country. In Indonesia, the debate regarding open and closed electoral systems continues. This article aims to analyze the comparison between these two electoral systems, focusing on their respective advantages and disadvantages. The research method employed is a comparative analysis, gathering data through literature review and analysis of elections in Indonesia. The analysis reveals that the open electoral system is more proportional, as it excels in expanding public participation, enhancing political representation, and strengthening party accountability. However, challenges in vote calculation and potential vote splitting still need to be addressed. In conclusion, this article argues that the open electoral system is more proportional compared to the closed system and holds the potential to enhance political participation in Indonesian society
印度尼西亚对公开和封闭的选举制度的比较:对更好安排的分析
选举制度是维持一个国家的民主和政治参与的一个关键方面。在印度尼西亚,关于开放和封闭选举制度的辩论仍在继续。本文旨在对这两种选举制度进行比较分析,重点分析其各自的优缺点。采用的研究方法是比较分析,通过文献综述和分析印度尼西亚的选举来收集数据。分析表明,公开选举制度在扩大公众参与、提高政治代表性和加强政党问责制等方面具有优势,因此更具比例性。然而,在选票计算和潜在的选票分裂方面的挑战仍然需要解决。总之,本文认为,与封闭制度相比,开放的选举制度更具比例性,并有可能提高印尼社会的政治参与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信