{"title":"A Sudden Frenzy: Improvisation, Orality, and Power in Renaissance Italy","authors":"Chris Picicci","doi":"10.5406/23256672.100.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coleman has written a comprehensive and accessible study on oral and improvised performance, a common and popular art form during the Italian Renaissance, contrary to Croce's assessment that it “held no historical importance” (146). The book explores the early modern humanistic fascination with the oral literary culture of the ancient world; Coleman employs an extensive intellectual corpus to illuminate the popularity of improvisational canterini as entertainment for the masses. The author examines key figures, including Antonio di Guido, Baccio Ugolini, Marsilio Ficino (from whose translation of Plato the title of the book is inspired), Angelo Poliziano, and Lorenzo de’ Medici, among others. He demonstrates how extemporaneous poetry and music of the early modern period represented a significant cultural force in multiple cities throughout the Italian peninsula, Florence's Piazza San Martino being a particularly important locale.The book contains a concise introduction, with five compact chapters: “The Uses of Oral Poetry in Quattrocento Florence,” “Inspired and Possessed” Marsilio Ficino and Oral Poetry,” “Secret Frenzies” Angelo Poliziano and Invention,” “The Power to Stir Up Others” Lorenzo de’ Medici and Improvisation,” and “The Improvisor and the World of the Courts.” Coleman convincingly analyzes documentation of the popularity of oral performance in early modern Italy, emphasizing that the vernacular ottava (cantari, strambotti, or rispetti) and terza rima (cantari and capitoli) were preferred poetic forms. The author affords extensive details with almost fifty pages of notes to accompany just over one hundred fifty pages of text, as well as a comprehensive bibliography that will be useful to scholars and students interested in oral performance in Renaissance culture.Coleman begins with anecdotes on the effect that ancient verse and legends have on plebeian audiences, demarcating the cultural categories between the highly literate (e.g., Poggio Bracciolini, who frowned upon improvised poetry, and his followers) and the masses. He stresses that the canterino culture was a public source of popular entertainment and often included melodic accompaniment: “[R]ecognition is growing that oral and improvisational performers of poetry and music were a major cultural force in Renaissance Italy” (5). Relying on ancient texts and theories of musical-poetic improvisation, Renaissance oral poets combined a set of preparation and training (ars) and talent (ingenium) together with divine power (furor) to advance their art form.In chapter 1, Coleman describes how the canterini wielded significant power over public attitudes. The relationship between the Medici family and Francesco Sforza was solidified thanks to performers praising the latter's military exploits. Coleman goes on to emphasize the alliance between the well-known araldi to the Signoria, Antonio di Meglio and Anselmo Calderoni, and the Medici family. Their oral poetry and skills as entertainers influenced public attitudes over Medici rule in Florence. In fact, Lucrezia Tornabuoni's literary output functioned in dialogue with the canterini in important respects despite the fact that oral performativity was almost exclusively a male-dominated arena. Coleman also contends that Florentine oral repertoires provided source material for Pulci's Morgante. The author gives readers detailed information about documents that act as historical artifacts for the tradition and popularity of canterino culture in early modern Florence.In chapter 2, Coleman discusses Ficino's relationship with the Medici family and his role as a leading authority of Renaissance culture. The author emphasizes Ficino's important contributions and highlights his translations of Plato's dialogues and his talent on the Orphic lyre—a musical instrument that for Ficino represents an emblem of engagement with ancient oral poetic traditions (44). He was passionate about oral spectacle, especially Greek poetry attributed to the mythical Orpheus and its relationship to a surviving and adaptable poetic corpus. Coleman studies Ficino's musical production, inspired by Orphic poetry, and its connection to his magical and astrological theories. The chapter details Ficino's fascination with Orpheus and advances the theory of divine poetic frenzy featured in the Platonic dialogues, an idea that had been previously expanded in Leonardo Bruni's incomplete Latin translation of the Phaedrus. Ficino was reluctant to publish his personal translations of the Orphic works; nonetheless, he shared them with friends and acquaintances and gave performances of what he believed to be Orphic models. Coleman emphasizes that “exploration of the idea of poetic frenzy was one of Ficino's most singular contributions to fifteenth-century Italian thought” (49). The notion of frenzy is derived from Ficino's commentary on Plato's Phaedrus; he follows this Greek work in his De amore and De divino furore in which he describes how frenzy, when it produces songs and poetry, is related to mystical, prophetic and/or amatory passion.Chapter 3 considers Ficino's influence on Poliziano. Poliziano believes that Platonic theory of divine poetic frenzy is as important as ars in improvised poetic performance. It is this latter element that enables one to succeed and recall earlier literary traditions when performing. For Poliziano, there is a continuity between ancient, especially Homeric poetry, and modern forms of oral poetry: “In place of the pure orality and unmediated inspiration of Homer, Poliziano emphasizes the essential role, for the modern improvisor, of textual study to furnish the raw materials that can be spontaneously recombined in flights of improvisational inspiration” (97).Chapter 4 examines the role of politics in canterino culture, specifically Lorenzo de’ Medici's rule in Florence, and his relationship to popular poetic and musical production, with special attention to his De summo bono and Selve. His unwavering cultivation of improvisational poetry emphasizes a desire to create a golden age in Florence under his authority. Coleman stresses how Lorenzo's lyrical and musical talents were shaped by Ficino and Poliziano. Lorenzo was also influenced by and fascinated with Pulci's adept use of satire, so much so that he parodied Ficino's translation of Plato's Symposium.In his final chapter, Coleman offers an historical account of the personages, events and traditions of the canterino legacy in Italian court culture, when performed poetry was vying for legitimacy among Latin and vernacular lyric. Performers like Bernardo Accolti demonstrated their talents in several different Italian courts and centers with a penchant for altering classic source texts with fantasia and pathos. Coleman demonstrates Accolti's inclusion of female voices in his musical and poetic subject matter, a decision certainly attributed to his contact with women like Isabella d'Este and Elisabetta Gonzaga. He touches on the role between oral poetry and gender and concludes the book by highlighting the well-known Settecento performer, Corilla Olimpica (Maria Maddalena Morelli). Mention of this topic confirms the need for further investigation of the evolution of female participation in improvised performance from the Renaissance to the Romantic period.Coleman's detailed research into the Florentine cantari, their verbal sparring, and their relationship with public tastes and Medicean rule, all make this book memorable. The popularity of improvised verse entertained the masses and often reconciled Platonic furor and Aristotelian imitation and technique. Coleman grapples with differing scholarly opinions regarding the oral poets’ authentic frenzy in extemporaneous performance and the quantity, or lack thereof, of intellectual preparation to achieve such rapturous ecstasy. This text nicely complements Blake Wilson's recent study, Singing to the lyre in Renaissance Italy, a comprehensive examination of the public-facing canterino tradition.","PeriodicalId":29826,"journal":{"name":"Italica Belgradensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italica Belgradensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23256672.100.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Coleman has written a comprehensive and accessible study on oral and improvised performance, a common and popular art form during the Italian Renaissance, contrary to Croce's assessment that it “held no historical importance” (146). The book explores the early modern humanistic fascination with the oral literary culture of the ancient world; Coleman employs an extensive intellectual corpus to illuminate the popularity of improvisational canterini as entertainment for the masses. The author examines key figures, including Antonio di Guido, Baccio Ugolini, Marsilio Ficino (from whose translation of Plato the title of the book is inspired), Angelo Poliziano, and Lorenzo de’ Medici, among others. He demonstrates how extemporaneous poetry and music of the early modern period represented a significant cultural force in multiple cities throughout the Italian peninsula, Florence's Piazza San Martino being a particularly important locale.The book contains a concise introduction, with five compact chapters: “The Uses of Oral Poetry in Quattrocento Florence,” “Inspired and Possessed” Marsilio Ficino and Oral Poetry,” “Secret Frenzies” Angelo Poliziano and Invention,” “The Power to Stir Up Others” Lorenzo de’ Medici and Improvisation,” and “The Improvisor and the World of the Courts.” Coleman convincingly analyzes documentation of the popularity of oral performance in early modern Italy, emphasizing that the vernacular ottava (cantari, strambotti, or rispetti) and terza rima (cantari and capitoli) were preferred poetic forms. The author affords extensive details with almost fifty pages of notes to accompany just over one hundred fifty pages of text, as well as a comprehensive bibliography that will be useful to scholars and students interested in oral performance in Renaissance culture.Coleman begins with anecdotes on the effect that ancient verse and legends have on plebeian audiences, demarcating the cultural categories between the highly literate (e.g., Poggio Bracciolini, who frowned upon improvised poetry, and his followers) and the masses. He stresses that the canterino culture was a public source of popular entertainment and often included melodic accompaniment: “[R]ecognition is growing that oral and improvisational performers of poetry and music were a major cultural force in Renaissance Italy” (5). Relying on ancient texts and theories of musical-poetic improvisation, Renaissance oral poets combined a set of preparation and training (ars) and talent (ingenium) together with divine power (furor) to advance their art form.In chapter 1, Coleman describes how the canterini wielded significant power over public attitudes. The relationship between the Medici family and Francesco Sforza was solidified thanks to performers praising the latter's military exploits. Coleman goes on to emphasize the alliance between the well-known araldi to the Signoria, Antonio di Meglio and Anselmo Calderoni, and the Medici family. Their oral poetry and skills as entertainers influenced public attitudes over Medici rule in Florence. In fact, Lucrezia Tornabuoni's literary output functioned in dialogue with the canterini in important respects despite the fact that oral performativity was almost exclusively a male-dominated arena. Coleman also contends that Florentine oral repertoires provided source material for Pulci's Morgante. The author gives readers detailed information about documents that act as historical artifacts for the tradition and popularity of canterino culture in early modern Florence.In chapter 2, Coleman discusses Ficino's relationship with the Medici family and his role as a leading authority of Renaissance culture. The author emphasizes Ficino's important contributions and highlights his translations of Plato's dialogues and his talent on the Orphic lyre—a musical instrument that for Ficino represents an emblem of engagement with ancient oral poetic traditions (44). He was passionate about oral spectacle, especially Greek poetry attributed to the mythical Orpheus and its relationship to a surviving and adaptable poetic corpus. Coleman studies Ficino's musical production, inspired by Orphic poetry, and its connection to his magical and astrological theories. The chapter details Ficino's fascination with Orpheus and advances the theory of divine poetic frenzy featured in the Platonic dialogues, an idea that had been previously expanded in Leonardo Bruni's incomplete Latin translation of the Phaedrus. Ficino was reluctant to publish his personal translations of the Orphic works; nonetheless, he shared them with friends and acquaintances and gave performances of what he believed to be Orphic models. Coleman emphasizes that “exploration of the idea of poetic frenzy was one of Ficino's most singular contributions to fifteenth-century Italian thought” (49). The notion of frenzy is derived from Ficino's commentary on Plato's Phaedrus; he follows this Greek work in his De amore and De divino furore in which he describes how frenzy, when it produces songs and poetry, is related to mystical, prophetic and/or amatory passion.Chapter 3 considers Ficino's influence on Poliziano. Poliziano believes that Platonic theory of divine poetic frenzy is as important as ars in improvised poetic performance. It is this latter element that enables one to succeed and recall earlier literary traditions when performing. For Poliziano, there is a continuity between ancient, especially Homeric poetry, and modern forms of oral poetry: “In place of the pure orality and unmediated inspiration of Homer, Poliziano emphasizes the essential role, for the modern improvisor, of textual study to furnish the raw materials that can be spontaneously recombined in flights of improvisational inspiration” (97).Chapter 4 examines the role of politics in canterino culture, specifically Lorenzo de’ Medici's rule in Florence, and his relationship to popular poetic and musical production, with special attention to his De summo bono and Selve. His unwavering cultivation of improvisational poetry emphasizes a desire to create a golden age in Florence under his authority. Coleman stresses how Lorenzo's lyrical and musical talents were shaped by Ficino and Poliziano. Lorenzo was also influenced by and fascinated with Pulci's adept use of satire, so much so that he parodied Ficino's translation of Plato's Symposium.In his final chapter, Coleman offers an historical account of the personages, events and traditions of the canterino legacy in Italian court culture, when performed poetry was vying for legitimacy among Latin and vernacular lyric. Performers like Bernardo Accolti demonstrated their talents in several different Italian courts and centers with a penchant for altering classic source texts with fantasia and pathos. Coleman demonstrates Accolti's inclusion of female voices in his musical and poetic subject matter, a decision certainly attributed to his contact with women like Isabella d'Este and Elisabetta Gonzaga. He touches on the role between oral poetry and gender and concludes the book by highlighting the well-known Settecento performer, Corilla Olimpica (Maria Maddalena Morelli). Mention of this topic confirms the need for further investigation of the evolution of female participation in improvised performance from the Renaissance to the Romantic period.Coleman's detailed research into the Florentine cantari, their verbal sparring, and their relationship with public tastes and Medicean rule, all make this book memorable. The popularity of improvised verse entertained the masses and often reconciled Platonic furor and Aristotelian imitation and technique. Coleman grapples with differing scholarly opinions regarding the oral poets’ authentic frenzy in extemporaneous performance and the quantity, or lack thereof, of intellectual preparation to achieve such rapturous ecstasy. This text nicely complements Blake Wilson's recent study, Singing to the lyre in Renaissance Italy, a comprehensive examination of the public-facing canterino tradition.
科尔曼对意大利文艺复兴时期常见的流行艺术形式——口头表演和即兴表演——进行了全面而易懂的研究,这与克罗齐认为它“没有历史重要性”的评价相反(146)。本书探讨了早期现代人文主义的魅力与古代世界的口头文学文化;科尔曼运用了广泛的知识语料库来阐明作为大众娱乐的即兴坎特里尼的流行。作者考察了一些关键人物,包括安东尼奥·迪·吉多、巴乔·乌戈利尼、马西利奥·菲西诺(该书书名的灵感来自他对柏拉图的翻译)、安吉洛·波利齐亚诺和洛伦佐·德·美第奇等人。他展示了近代早期的即兴诗歌和音乐如何在意大利半岛的多个城市中代表了一股重要的文化力量,佛罗伦萨的圣马蒂诺广场是一个特别重要的场所。这本书包含了一个简洁的介绍,有五个紧凑的章节:“口头诗歌在四世纪佛罗伦萨的使用”,“灵感和占有”马西利奥·菲西诺和口头诗歌,“秘密狂热”安吉洛·波利齐亚诺和发明,“煽动他人的力量”洛伦佐·德·美第奇和即兴创作,“即兴和法庭的世界。”科尔曼令人信服地分析了早期现代意大利口头表演流行的文献,强调方言ottava (cantari, strambotti, or rispetti)和terza rima (cantari和capitoli)是首选的诗歌形式。作者提供了广泛的细节,近50页的笔记,伴随着超过150页的文本,以及一个全面的参考书目,这将是有用的学者和学生对文艺复兴文化中的口头表演感兴趣。科尔曼从古代诗歌和传说对平民受众的影响的轶事开始,划分了高度识字的人(例如,对即兴诗歌不满的波焦·布拉乔利尼及其追随者)和大众的文化类别。他强调,坎特里诺文化是大众娱乐的公共来源,通常包括旋律伴奏:“人们越来越认识到,口头和即兴的诗歌和音乐表演者是文艺复兴时期意大利的主要文化力量”(5)。依靠古代文本和音乐诗歌即兴创作理论,文艺复兴时期的口头诗人将一系列准备和训练(ars)和天赋(ingenium)与神的力量(furror)结合起来,以推进他们的艺术形式。在第一章中,科尔曼描述了坎特里尼如何对公众态度施加重大影响。美第奇家族和弗朗切斯科·斯福尔扎之间的关系由于表演者对后者的军事功绩的赞扬而得以巩固。科尔曼接着强调了著名的阿拉尔迪与贵族、安东尼奥·迪·梅利奥和安塞尔莫·卡尔德龙以及美第奇家族之间的联盟。他们的口头诗歌和表演技巧影响了佛罗伦萨公众对美第奇统治的态度。事实上,Lucrezia Tornabuoni的文学作品在与canterini的重要对话中发挥了作用,尽管口头表演几乎完全是男性主导的舞台。科尔曼还认为,佛罗伦萨人的口述曲目为普尔奇的《摩根特》提供了素材。作者向读者详细介绍了近代早期佛罗伦萨坎特利诺文化的传统和流行的历史文物。在第二章中,科尔曼讨论了菲西诺与美第奇家族的关系,以及他作为文艺复兴文化的主要权威的角色。作者强调了菲西诺的重要贡献,并强调了他对柏拉图对话录的翻译,以及他在奥尔甫斯七弦琴上的才能——对菲西诺来说,这种乐器代表了与古代口头诗歌传统接触的象征。他热衷于口头奇观,特别是希腊诗歌归因于神话中的俄耳甫斯,以及它与现存和适应性强的诗歌语料库的关系。科尔曼研究菲西诺的音乐作品,灵感来自俄耳甫斯诗歌,以及它与他的魔法和占星术理论的联系。这一章详细描述了菲西诺对俄耳甫斯的迷恋,并提出了柏拉图对话中出现的神圣的诗歌狂热理论,这一观点此前在列奥纳多·布鲁尼不完整的《费德鲁斯篇》拉丁译本中得到了扩展。菲西诺不愿意出版他个人翻译的奥尔甫斯作品;尽管如此,他还是与朋友和熟人分享,并表演了他认为是奥尔弗斯模型的表演。科尔曼强调,“对狂热的诗意的探索是菲西诺对15世纪意大利思想最独特的贡献之一”(49)。