Editor’s Introduction
IF 0.1
0 ART
Paul Stirton
{"title":"Editor’s Introduction","authors":"Paul Stirton","doi":"10.1086/728329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous articleNext article FreeEditor’s IntroductionPaul StirtonPaul StirtonBard Graduate Center, New York City, USA Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreCamouflage—the use of visual effects for mimicry, concealment, or deception—emerged as a vital subject for biologists in the nineteenth century. Charles Darwin was only one of many scientists who took an interest in this phenomenon in nature. In the twentieth century, artists became involved, partly out of fascination with these same visual effects but also as a means of exploring how we see and apprehend visual imagery. Caroline van Eck takes a different tack entirely, acknowledging these earlier approaches but exploring camouflage as a cultural technique that ultimately manifests itself in various forms of human material culture. In a wide-ranging article that looks at the work of Vladimir Nabokov, Roger Caillois, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Henri de Saint-Simon, she uncovers ways in which we might reconsider the work of theorists like Gottfried Semper and Alois Riegl, especially with regard to their approach to the cultural meanings of objects. As she writes in her conclusion, this may be a tentative first definition, but it offers “a way of thinking about the relation between nature and culture.”Our other articles are concerned more with specific objects: a late eighteenth-century “calligraphic portrait” of the Spanish Viceroy of Mexico, which reveals something of the culture and politics of Spain’s imperial territory, and a study of the Chelsea ceramic figure modelers of interwar London. In the latter article, Marshall Colman points out that figurative ceramics were at the heart of the studio pottery movement, and while this aspect has survived in the collecting and scholarship of Central Europe, changes in taste have meant that it has been largely ignored in accounts of British ceramics.Aby Warburg’s foray into the ethnography of “Indian” culture in New Mexico and Arizona is a prominent feature in the vast corpus of writings on this foundational scholar of art history and iconography. What is less well known is that he was in contact with Franz Boas, the pioneer of the anthropology of the Indigenous peoples of North America. Their correspondence is published here in translation for the first time, complete with an introduction by Claudia Wedepohl and Brooke Penaloza Patzak. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by West 86th Volume 30, Number 1Spring–Summer 2023 Sponsored by the Bard Graduate Center, New York Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/728329 © Copyright 2023 by The Bard Graduate Center: Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.","PeriodicalId":53917,"journal":{"name":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West 86th-A Journal of Decorative Arts Design History and Material Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/728329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous articleNext article FreeEditor’s IntroductionPaul StirtonPaul StirtonBard Graduate Center, New York City, USA Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreCamouflage—the use of visual effects for mimicry, concealment, or deception—emerged as a vital subject for biologists in the nineteenth century. Charles Darwin was only one of many scientists who took an interest in this phenomenon in nature. In the twentieth century, artists became involved, partly out of fascination with these same visual effects but also as a means of exploring how we see and apprehend visual imagery. Caroline van Eck takes a different tack entirely, acknowledging these earlier approaches but exploring camouflage as a cultural technique that ultimately manifests itself in various forms of human material culture. In a wide-ranging article that looks at the work of Vladimir Nabokov, Roger Caillois, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Henri de Saint-Simon, she uncovers ways in which we might reconsider the work of theorists like Gottfried Semper and Alois Riegl, especially with regard to their approach to the cultural meanings of objects. As she writes in her conclusion, this may be a tentative first definition, but it offers “a way of thinking about the relation between nature and culture.”Our other articles are concerned more with specific objects: a late eighteenth-century “calligraphic portrait” of the Spanish Viceroy of Mexico, which reveals something of the culture and politics of Spain’s imperial territory, and a study of the Chelsea ceramic figure modelers of interwar London. In the latter article, Marshall Colman points out that figurative ceramics were at the heart of the studio pottery movement, and while this aspect has survived in the collecting and scholarship of Central Europe, changes in taste have meant that it has been largely ignored in accounts of British ceramics.Aby Warburg’s foray into the ethnography of “Indian” culture in New Mexico and Arizona is a prominent feature in the vast corpus of writings on this foundational scholar of art history and iconography. What is less well known is that he was in contact with Franz Boas, the pioneer of the anthropology of the Indigenous peoples of North America. Their correspondence is published here in translation for the first time, complete with an introduction by Claudia Wedepohl and Brooke Penaloza Patzak. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by West 86th Volume 30, Number 1Spring–Summer 2023 Sponsored by the Bard Graduate Center, New York Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/728329 © Copyright 2023 by The Bard Graduate Center: Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
编辑器的介绍
上一篇文章下一篇文章免费编辑的介绍保罗·斯特顿保罗·斯特顿巴德研究生中心,美国纽约市搜索本文作者更多文章PDFPDF +全文添加到收藏列表下载CitationTrack citationspermissions转载分享在facebook twitterlinkedinredditemailprint sectionsmoreamouflag利用视觉效果进行模仿、隐藏或欺骗,在19世纪成为生物学家的一个重要课题。查尔斯·达尔文只是众多对自然界中这种现象感兴趣的科学家之一。在20世纪,艺术家们开始参与其中,部分是出于对这些视觉效果的迷恋,同时也是探索我们如何看待和理解视觉图像的一种手段。Caroline van Eck采取了完全不同的策略,她承认这些早期的方法,但将伪装作为一种文化技术探索,最终体现在各种形式的人类物质文化中。在一篇内容广泛的文章中,她考察了弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫、罗杰·卡伊洛斯、弗里德里希·尼采和亨利·德·圣西门的作品,揭示了我们可能重新考虑戈特弗里德·森佩尔和阿洛伊斯·里格尔等理论家的作品的方式,特别是关于他们对物体文化意义的研究方法。正如她在结论中所写的那样,这可能是一个初步的定义,但它提供了“一种思考自然与文化之间关系的方式”。我们的其他文章更关注具体的对象:一幅18世纪晚期西班牙墨西哥总督的“书法肖像”,它揭示了西班牙帝国领土的文化和政治,以及对两次世界大战期间伦敦切尔西陶瓷人物模型师的研究。在后一篇文章中,马歇尔·科尔曼指出,具象陶瓷是工作室陶器运动的核心,虽然这方面在中欧的收藏和学术中幸存下来,但品味的变化意味着它在很大程度上被英国陶瓷的叙述所忽视。阿比·沃伯格(Aby Warburg)对新墨西哥州和亚利桑那州“印第安”文化人种志的探索,是这位艺术史和肖像学基础学者大量著作中的一个突出特点。鲜为人知的是,他与北美原住民人类学的先驱弗朗兹·博阿斯(Franz Boas)有过接触。他们的通信首次在这里翻译出版,并附有Claudia Wedepohl和Brooke Penaloza Patzak的介绍。上一篇文章下一篇文章详细信息图表参考文献引用West 86卷30,第1期2023春夏由纽约巴德研究生中心赞助文章doi://doi.org/10.1086/728329©版权所有2023由巴德研究生中心:装饰艺术,设计历史和物质文化。Crossref报告没有引用这篇文章的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。