Effect of Two Different Digitally Constructed Bar Materials on The Supporting Structures of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture (In-Vitro Study)

Shaimaa Mohammed
{"title":"Effect of Two Different Digitally Constructed Bar Materials on The Supporting Structures of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture (In-Vitro Study)","authors":"Shaimaa Mohammed","doi":"10.21608/asdj.2023.200385.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate which bar material (BioHPP or Cobalt Chromium) induced less stresses on the supporting structures of implant retained mandibular overdenture. Materials and methods: Completely edentulous mandibular educational cast was scanned. Designing an STL file including; implants beds, mucosal space and vertical slots for strain gauges was done. A bar joint design was selected & STL files were transferred to 5-axis milling machine to mill bars as follow: group I: Six bars were milled from BioHPP blank, group II: Six bars were milled from cobalt chromium blank. For each model, four strain gauge sensors were placed and a universal testing machine were used to apply a static load of 100N bilaterally between lower second premolar and first molar then unilaterally on the right side. The mean and the standard deviation of the recorded readings were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results: The result of this study showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding bilateral loading as the mean micro strain was 314.83 &313.5 μm/m for group I & II respectively.Under unilateral loading, the results showed that the mean micro strain in the loaded side was 495.16 &493.83 μm/m for group I & II respectively and the result was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that: -BioHPP and Cobalt-Chromium milled bars have no differences regarding micro strains developed in the supporting structures either upon bilateral or unilateral loading in implant retained mandibular overdenture.","PeriodicalId":104867,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2023.200385.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate which bar material (BioHPP or Cobalt Chromium) induced less stresses on the supporting structures of implant retained mandibular overdenture. Materials and methods: Completely edentulous mandibular educational cast was scanned. Designing an STL file including; implants beds, mucosal space and vertical slots for strain gauges was done. A bar joint design was selected & STL files were transferred to 5-axis milling machine to mill bars as follow: group I: Six bars were milled from BioHPP blank, group II: Six bars were milled from cobalt chromium blank. For each model, four strain gauge sensors were placed and a universal testing machine were used to apply a static load of 100N bilaterally between lower second premolar and first molar then unilaterally on the right side. The mean and the standard deviation of the recorded readings were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results: The result of this study showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding bilateral loading as the mean micro strain was 314.83 &313.5 μm/m for group I & II respectively.Under unilateral loading, the results showed that the mean micro strain in the loaded side was 495.16 &493.83 μm/m for group I & II respectively and the result was statistically non-significant. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that: -BioHPP and Cobalt-Chromium milled bars have no differences regarding micro strains developed in the supporting structures either upon bilateral or unilateral loading in implant retained mandibular overdenture.
两种不同的数字构建棒材对种植保留下颌覆盖义齿支撑结构的影响(体外研究)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书