An analysis of how Chinese Netizens, especially men, react to feminismthrough social media

Jingshu Peng
{"title":"An analysis of how Chinese Netizens, especially men, react to feminismthrough social media","authors":"Jingshu Peng","doi":"10.61173/kjhj7w44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advancement of technology in recent years, social media has become an increasingly significant part of people’s everyday lives, while feminism is beginning to be recognized as the flow of information becomes more accessible. However, unlike in the West, different Chinese have varying perspectives and views of feminism; some interpret it as a female advantage, while others see it as a remedy to help Chinese women awaken. By commenting on the work of gender-specific bloggers who share knowledge and content about feminism on Douyin (Chinese “Tiktok”), this study investigates how different types of people, particularly men, respond differently to feminism from three different perspectives. According to the data, the public mainly addresses bloggers through sexualization, ad hominem attacks, and patriarchal dismissiveness. With these three characteristics in mind, different men view bloggers who support feminism differently, resulting in more or less diverse remarks for or against them. This study categorizes comments from various guys under various bloggers’ works presenting feminism in Douyin (China’s “TikTok”) and teaches viewers how to differentiate and recognize their categories.","PeriodicalId":373664,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies","volume":"24 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61173/kjhj7w44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advancement of technology in recent years, social media has become an increasingly significant part of people’s everyday lives, while feminism is beginning to be recognized as the flow of information becomes more accessible. However, unlike in the West, different Chinese have varying perspectives and views of feminism; some interpret it as a female advantage, while others see it as a remedy to help Chinese women awaken. By commenting on the work of gender-specific bloggers who share knowledge and content about feminism on Douyin (Chinese “Tiktok”), this study investigates how different types of people, particularly men, respond differently to feminism from three different perspectives. According to the data, the public mainly addresses bloggers through sexualization, ad hominem attacks, and patriarchal dismissiveness. With these three characteristics in mind, different men view bloggers who support feminism differently, resulting in more or less diverse remarks for or against them. This study categorizes comments from various guys under various bloggers’ works presenting feminism in Douyin (China’s “TikTok”) and teaches viewers how to differentiate and recognize their categories.
分析中国网民,尤其是男性,如何通过社交媒体对女权主义做出反应
随着近年来科技的进步,社交媒体已经成为人们日常生活中越来越重要的一部分,而随着信息的流动变得更容易获得,女权主义也开始得到认可。然而,与西方不同的是,不同的中国人对女性主义有不同的看法和看法;一些人认为这是女性的优势,而另一些人则认为这是帮助中国女性觉醒的一种补救措施。通过评论在抖音(中国的“抖音”)上分享女权主义知识和内容的性别博主的工作,本研究从三个不同的角度调查了不同类型的人,特别是男性,如何对女权主义做出不同的反应。数据显示,公众主要通过性化、人身攻击和男权轻蔑来对待博主。考虑到这三个特点,不同的男人对支持女权主义的博主有不同的看法,导致支持或反对她们的言论或多或少不同。本研究对抖音(中国的“抖音”)上不同博主的女权主义作品下的不同男人的评论进行了分类,并教观众如何区分和识别他们的类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信