Commodity storage and the cost of capital: Evidence from Illinois grain farms

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Joseph P. Janzen, Nicholas D. Paulson, Juo-Han Tsay
{"title":"Commodity storage and the cost of capital: Evidence from Illinois grain farms","authors":"Joseph P. Janzen,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Paulson,&nbsp;Juo-Han Tsay","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Commodity inventories are the key state variable determining the magnitude of commodity price responses to supply and demand shocks. Many firms in commodity supply chains use storage, but we know little about which firms and why. The economic theory of storage asserts that firms in a competitive market for inventories will store based on current and expected market prices and the per-unit cost of storing. We empirically test at the firm-level the importance of one major cost of storage: the opportunity cost of capital used to value foregone revenue from deferred commodity sales. To do so, we use panel data from thousands of Illinois farms who hold inventories of corn and soybeans. Although interest rates as a measure of capital costs are unlikely to vary widely across firms in this context, we exploit variation in the weighted average cost of capital due to cross-firm differences in capital structure. Using two-way fixed effects regressions, we find a statistically significant average effect of capital costs on inventory that masks notable heterogeneity across firms. Panel quantile regressions reveal two groups of firms: one whose inventory holdings are responsive to changes in the opportunity cost of storage and another whose are not. Our results suggest some farms behave like the profit-maximizing ones from theory but substantial inframarginal commodity inventories are held by farms for other reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"106 2","pages":"526-546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12436","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commodity inventories are the key state variable determining the magnitude of commodity price responses to supply and demand shocks. Many firms in commodity supply chains use storage, but we know little about which firms and why. The economic theory of storage asserts that firms in a competitive market for inventories will store based on current and expected market prices and the per-unit cost of storing. We empirically test at the firm-level the importance of one major cost of storage: the opportunity cost of capital used to value foregone revenue from deferred commodity sales. To do so, we use panel data from thousands of Illinois farms who hold inventories of corn and soybeans. Although interest rates as a measure of capital costs are unlikely to vary widely across firms in this context, we exploit variation in the weighted average cost of capital due to cross-firm differences in capital structure. Using two-way fixed effects regressions, we find a statistically significant average effect of capital costs on inventory that masks notable heterogeneity across firms. Panel quantile regressions reveal two groups of firms: one whose inventory holdings are responsive to changes in the opportunity cost of storage and another whose are not. Our results suggest some farms behave like the profit-maximizing ones from theory but substantial inframarginal commodity inventories are held by farms for other reasons.

Abstract Image

商品储存和资本成本:伊利诺伊州谷物农场的证据
商品库存是决定商品价格对供需冲击反应幅度的关键状态变量。商品供应链中的许多企业都使用仓储,但我们对哪些企业以及为什么使用仓储知之甚少。储存的经济理论认为,在库存竞争市场中,企业会根据当前和预期的市场价格以及单位储存成本进行储存。我们从企业层面实证检验了储存的一项主要成本的重要性:用于估算推迟商品销售所损失的收入的资本机会成本。为此,我们使用了来自伊利诺伊州数千个持有玉米和大豆库存的农场的面板数据。虽然在这种情况下,作为资本成本衡量标准的利率不太可能在不同公司之间有很大差异,但我们利用了因跨公司资本结构差异而导致的加权平均资本成本的变化。利用双向固定效应回归,我们发现资本成本对存货的平均影响在统计上具有显著性,掩盖了企业间的显著异质性。面板量子回归显示出两类企业:一类企业的存货持有量能对存储机会成本的变化做出反应,另一类则不然。我们的研究结果表明,一些农场的行为与理论上的利润最大化农场类似,但也有一些农场出于其他原因持有大量非利润商品库存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信