How China’s Double Reduction Policy Reduces the Burden on Students: An Example of Double Reduction Policy Texts in 28 Chinese Provinces (Autonomous Regions and Municipalities)

Fangzheng Yang
{"title":"How China’s Double Reduction Policy Reduces the Burden on Students: An Example of Double Reduction Policy Texts in 28 Chinese Provinces (Autonomous Regions and Municipalities)","authors":"Fangzheng Yang","doi":"10.4236/ce.2023.1411133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Re-formulation of the double-minus policy by local governments is an important part of promoting a high-quality education system for compulsory education and fostering educational equity. This study aims to quantitatively analyze the action measures taken by the governments of 28 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) in China to reformulate the central double-minus policy. The study used the content analysis method and NVivo12 qualitative analysis software to analyze the 28 double-reduced policy texts in three dimensions, policy tools, policy subjects, and areas of student burden reduction. The study found that in terms of policy tools, supply-type policy tools are used more reasonably but are generally insufficient, environment-type policy tools are dominant but internally polarised, and the overall input of demand-type policy tools is low. In the dimension of policy subjects, the coordinated participation of multiple subjects has initially taken shape, but the participation of families, communities, and the media needs to be improved. In the area of student burden reduction, a synergy has been formed between in-school and out-of-school simultaneous burden reduction. Therefore, in the future, it is important to further link up multiple policy bodies, increase the input of policy tools and collaborate to promote both in-school and out-of-school load reduction to promote the implementation of the double-reducing policy.","PeriodicalId":90814,"journal":{"name":"Creative education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.1411133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Re-formulation of the double-minus policy by local governments is an important part of promoting a high-quality education system for compulsory education and fostering educational equity. This study aims to quantitatively analyze the action measures taken by the governments of 28 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) in China to reformulate the central double-minus policy. The study used the content analysis method and NVivo12 qualitative analysis software to analyze the 28 double-reduced policy texts in three dimensions, policy tools, policy subjects, and areas of student burden reduction. The study found that in terms of policy tools, supply-type policy tools are used more reasonably but are generally insufficient, environment-type policy tools are dominant but internally polarised, and the overall input of demand-type policy tools is low. In the dimension of policy subjects, the coordinated participation of multiple subjects has initially taken shape, but the participation of families, communities, and the media needs to be improved. In the area of student burden reduction, a synergy has been formed between in-school and out-of-school simultaneous burden reduction. Therefore, in the future, it is important to further link up multiple policy bodies, increase the input of policy tools and collaborate to promote both in-school and out-of-school load reduction to promote the implementation of the double-reducing policy.
中国的双轨制政策如何减轻学生负担——以中国28个省(区、市)的双轨制政策文本为例
地方重新制定“双负”政策,是推进义务教育优质教育体系建设、促进教育公平的重要内容。本研究旨在定量分析中国28个省(区、市)政府为重新制定中央双负政策所采取的行动措施。本研究采用内容分析法和NVivo12定性分析软件,从政策工具、政策主体、学生减负领域三个维度对28篇双减负政策文本进行分析。研究发现,在政策工具方面,供给型政策工具使用较为合理但普遍不足,环境型政策工具占主导地位但内部两极分化,需求型政策工具总体投入较低。在政策主体维度上,多主体协调参与已初步形成,但家庭、社区、媒体的参与还有待完善。在学生减负方面,形成了校内外同步减负的协同效应。因此,未来需要进一步联结多个政策主体,加大政策工具投入,协同推进校内外减负,推动双减负政策落地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信