Inquiry-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Norwegian Approach

Khanh-Quang Tran
{"title":"Inquiry-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Norwegian Approach","authors":"Khanh-Quang Tran","doi":"10.18178/ijlt.9.3.246-250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inquiry of research-based learning in the form of groupwork can easily end up being less than expected. It is because groupwork assessment is dealing with process and can be far trickier than assessing a team’s work dealing with product. This study aims to identify an assessment approach for effective inquiry-based learning in engineering education. For this purpose, four different perspectives were presented and discussed in combination with key constraints to implementing research-based learning. The perspectives include student reflection, collegial reflection, personal reflection, and literature. It was suggested that a combined method of continuous and qualitative assessment might be the most plausible.","PeriodicalId":93451,"journal":{"name":"International journal of learning and teaching","volume":"301 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of learning and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.9.3.246-250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inquiry of research-based learning in the form of groupwork can easily end up being less than expected. It is because groupwork assessment is dealing with process and can be far trickier than assessing a team’s work dealing with product. This study aims to identify an assessment approach for effective inquiry-based learning in engineering education. For this purpose, four different perspectives were presented and discussed in combination with key constraints to implementing research-based learning. The perspectives include student reflection, collegial reflection, personal reflection, and literature. It was suggested that a combined method of continuous and qualitative assessment might be the most plausible.
工程教育中的探究式学习:挪威方法
以小组合作的形式进行研究性学习的探究,很容易产生意想不到的结果。这是因为小组工作评估处理的是过程,比评估处理产品的团队工作要棘手得多。本研究旨在找出工程教育中有效的探究式学习评估方法。为此,本文提出了四种不同的观点,并结合实施研究性学习的关键制约因素进行了讨论。这些视角包括学生反思、学院反思、个人反思和文学。有人建议,一种连续和定性评价相结合的方法可能是最合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信