Relative risk factors of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) in patients with severe central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)

IF 1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Haiming Yu, Yunfeng Han, Rui Zhang, Chu Sun, Mingda Wang, Bo Yue, Kaiping Chou, Bin Li, Nan Zhang
{"title":"Relative risk factors of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) in patients with severe central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)","authors":"Haiming Yu, Yunfeng Han, Rui Zhang, Chu Sun, Mingda Wang, Bo Yue, Kaiping Chou, Bin Li, Nan Zhang","doi":"10.1080/26895293.2023.2172460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incidence of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was evaluated to explore potential pathogenesis in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In a total of 209 patients with severe LSS, 290 intervertebral levels were narrow, among which 248 showed a positive SedSign, giving a prevalence of 85.52%. Those levels with a positive SedSign were further analyzed relative to those with a negative SedSign. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the cross-sectional area (CSA) or the posteroanterior diameter (PAD). In contrast, there was a significant difference between the groups for the grade of degenerative facet joint (DFJ) (p < 0.05), the thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) (p < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area difference (CSAD) (p < 0.01). In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify associated factors. The area under the ROC curve for PAD was 0.608 (p < 0.05), for DFJ was 0.634 (p < 0.05), for TLF was 0.74 (p < 0.01), and for CSAD was 0.911 (p < 0.01). In summary, a positive SedSign has notable advantages in assisting with the diagnosis of severe LSS. Compression of the dural sac from the rear may be the main risk factors of a positive SedSign.","PeriodicalId":48478,"journal":{"name":"All Life","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"All Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895293.2023.2172460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of nerve root sedimentation sign (SedSign) was evaluated to explore potential pathogenesis in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In a total of 209 patients with severe LSS, 290 intervertebral levels were narrow, among which 248 showed a positive SedSign, giving a prevalence of 85.52%. Those levels with a positive SedSign were further analyzed relative to those with a negative SedSign. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the cross-sectional area (CSA) or the posteroanterior diameter (PAD). In contrast, there was a significant difference between the groups for the grade of degenerative facet joint (DFJ) (p < 0.05), the thickness of ligamentum flavum (TLF) (p < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area difference (CSAD) (p < 0.01). In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify associated factors. The area under the ROC curve for PAD was 0.608 (p < 0.05), for DFJ was 0.634 (p < 0.05), for TLF was 0.74 (p < 0.01), and for CSAD was 0.911 (p < 0.01). In summary, a positive SedSign has notable advantages in assisting with the diagnosis of severe LSS. Compression of the dural sac from the rear may be the main risk factors of a positive SedSign.
重度中枢性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者神经根沉降征(SedSign)的相关危险因素分析
评估神经根沉降征(SedSign)的发生率,探讨严重腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的潜在发病机制。209例重度LSS患者中,290例椎间节段狭窄,其中248例SedSign阳性,患病率为85.52%。与SedSign阴性的水平相比,进一步分析SedSign阳性的水平。两组间的横截面积(CSA)和后前径(PAD)无显著差异。两组间退行性关节突关节(DFJ)等级(p < 0.05)、黄韧带(TLF)厚度(p < 0.01)、横截面积差(CSAD) (p < 0.01)差异均有统计学意义。此外,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定相关因素。PAD的ROC曲线下面积为0.608 (p < 0.05), DFJ为0.634 (p < 0.05), TLF为0.74 (p < 0.01), CSAD为0.911 (p < 0.01)。综上所述,SedSign阳性在协助诊断严重LSS方面具有显著优势。硬膜囊后部受压可能是SedSign阳性的主要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
All Life
All Life MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信