Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of <i>Euodia rutaecarpa</i> Benth acupressure and Wendan decoction in the treatment of vertigo

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tianying Wu, Qiang Zheng, Shuxian Niu
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of &lt;i&gt;Euodia rutaecarpa&lt;/i&gt; Benth acupressure and Wendan decoction in the treatment of vertigo","authors":"Tianying Wu, Qiang Zheng, Shuxian Niu","doi":"10.4314/tjpr.v22i8.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of combining Euodia rutaecarpa Benth acupressure with Wendan decoction for the treatment of vertigo, thereby establishing a theoretical framework for informed clinical practice.Methods: Computer-based search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled literature pertaining to efficacy and safety of Euodia rutaecarpa Benth acupressure in combination with Wendan decoction for management of vertigo. The experimental group received an intervention of Euodia rutaecarpa Benth acupressure combined with Wendan decoction. Articles that met set inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened and evaluated for quality based on Cochrane Quality Rating Scale. Baseline data, intervention data and outcome indicators of included studies were also extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.Results: The difference in symptom scores between groups was statistically significant (RR = -0.04, 95 % CI (-0.3, 0.23), p = 0.78). Meta-analysis of the outcome indicators showed heterogeneity at p < 0.0001, I2 = 91 %. I2 = 91 > 50 %. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups in terms of total treatment efficiency (RR = 0.31, 95 % CI (-0.25, 0.88), p = 0.28). Heterogeneity of vertigo degree score showed p < 0.0001, I2 = 98 %. I2 = 98 % > 50 %, SMD = 2.34, 95 % CI (0.69, 3.99), p = 0.53.Conclusion: The combination of clinical Euodia rutaecarpa Upright acupressure and Wendan decoction demonstrates significant clinical effectiveness in treating vertigo as evidenced by improvement of all indicators. Moreover, this treatment approach exhibits a high level of safety.","PeriodicalId":23347,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i8.29","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of combining Euodia rutaecarpa Benth acupressure with Wendan decoction for the treatment of vertigo, thereby establishing a theoretical framework for informed clinical practice.Methods: Computer-based search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled literature pertaining to efficacy and safety of Euodia rutaecarpa Benth acupressure in combination with Wendan decoction for management of vertigo. The experimental group received an intervention of Euodia rutaecarpa Benth acupressure combined with Wendan decoction. Articles that met set inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened and evaluated for quality based on Cochrane Quality Rating Scale. Baseline data, intervention data and outcome indicators of included studies were also extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.Results: The difference in symptom scores between groups was statistically significant (RR = -0.04, 95 % CI (-0.3, 0.23), p = 0.78). Meta-analysis of the outcome indicators showed heterogeneity at p < 0.0001, I2 = 91 %. I2 = 91 > 50 %. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between groups in terms of total treatment efficiency (RR = 0.31, 95 % CI (-0.25, 0.88), p = 0.28). Heterogeneity of vertigo degree score showed p < 0.0001, I2 = 98 %. I2 = 98 % > 50 %, SMD = 2.34, 95 % CI (0.69, 3.99), p = 0.53.Conclusion: The combination of clinical Euodia rutaecarpa Upright acupressure and Wendan decoction demonstrates significant clinical effectiveness in treating vertigo as evidenced by improvement of all indicators. Moreover, this treatment approach exhibits a high level of safety.
<i>紫荆</i>疗效meta分析穴位按压加温丹汤治疗眩晕
目的:系统评价温胆汤联合朱茱萸穴压治疗眩晕的疗效和安全性,为临床实践提供理论依据。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane等数据库,筛选有关刺痛联合文丹汤治疗眩晕疗效和安全性的随机对照文献。试验组患者给予温胆汤加温茱萸底穴按摩干预。根据Cochrane质量评定量表对符合纳入和排除标准的文章进行筛选和质量评价。还提取了纳入研究的基线数据、干预数据和结局指标。采用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。结果:两组患者症状评分差异有统计学意义(RR = -0.04, 95% CI (-0.3, 0.23), p = 0.78)。结果指标的荟萃分析显示p <存在异质性;0.0001, i2 = 91%。I2 = 91 >50%。差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)组间总治疗效率比较(RR = 0.31, 95% CI (-0.25, 0.88), p = 0.28)。眩晕度评分的异质性显示p <0.0001, i2 = 98%。I2 = 98% >, SMD = 2.34, 95% CI (0.69, 3.99), p = 0.53。结论:临床乌龙果直立指压联合温丹汤治疗眩晕临床疗效显著,各项指标均有改善。此外,这种治疗方法具有很高的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
490
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: We seek to encourage pharmaceutical and allied research of tropical and international relevance and to foster multidisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare professionals. We publish articles in pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines (including biotechnology, cell and molecular biology, drug utilization including adverse drug events, medical and other life sciences, and related engineering fields). Although primarily devoted to original research papers, we welcome reviews on current topics of special interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信