Comparison of fascial plane blocks (ESPB vs. TPVB) for pain relief following modified radical mastectomy

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
S Jayakrishnan, Amit Dua, Alok Kumar
{"title":"Comparison of fascial plane blocks (ESPB vs. TPVB) for pain relief following modified radical mastectomy","authors":"S Jayakrishnan, Amit Dua, Alok Kumar","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_90_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and Aims: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique compared to the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in providing postoperative pain relief in breast surgeries. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a commonly performed surgery for breast cancer. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of ESPB and TPVB in providing postoperative pain relief after MRM. Material and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sixty ASA I–III adult patients (age >18 years) scheduled to undergo elective unilateral MRM for breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Ultrasound-guided ESPB or TPVB with 0.25% bupivacaine was performed preoperatively on the patients randomized into two groups, namely, the ESPB and TPVB groups. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Morphine consumption and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Results: Primarily, the mean postoperative VAS scores between the two groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h showed no statistical significance and were comparable when matched at different time points. However, 24-h morphine consumption was significantly more in the ESPB group ( P = 0.035). Duration of block performance also showed a significant difference, with ESPB taking less time to perform ( P < 0.001). The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients and length of hospital stay in both the groups were similar. Conclusions: Both ESPB and TPVB provided adequate analgesia in patients undergoing MRM; however, TPVB had better efficacy and opioid-sparing effect when compared to ESPB.","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_90_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique compared to the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in providing postoperative pain relief in breast surgeries. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a commonly performed surgery for breast cancer. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of ESPB and TPVB in providing postoperative pain relief after MRM. Material and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sixty ASA I–III adult patients (age >18 years) scheduled to undergo elective unilateral MRM for breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Ultrasound-guided ESPB or TPVB with 0.25% bupivacaine was performed preoperatively on the patients randomized into two groups, namely, the ESPB and TPVB groups. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Morphine consumption and Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Results: Primarily, the mean postoperative VAS scores between the two groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h showed no statistical significance and were comparable when matched at different time points. However, 24-h morphine consumption was significantly more in the ESPB group ( P = 0.035). Duration of block performance also showed a significant difference, with ESPB taking less time to perform ( P < 0.001). The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients and length of hospital stay in both the groups were similar. Conclusions: Both ESPB and TPVB provided adequate analgesia in patients undergoing MRM; however, TPVB had better efficacy and opioid-sparing effect when compared to ESPB.
改良乳房根治术后筋膜平面阻滞(ESPB与TPVB)缓解疼痛的比较
背景与目的:与胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)相比,竖脊平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种新的区域麻醉技术,可以缓解乳房手术术后疼痛。改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)是一种常用的乳腺癌手术。本研究的目的是比较ESPB和TPVB在MRM术后疼痛缓解方面的疗效。材料和方法:本研究是在某三级护理教学医院进行的前瞻性随机研究。60例ASA I-III成年患者(年龄18岁)计划接受选择性单侧磁共振成像治疗乳腺癌。术前采用0.25%布比卡因超声引导下ESPB或TPVB,随机分为ESPB组和TPVB组。所有患者均接受患者自控镇痛以缓解术后疼痛。分别于术后3、6、12、24 h记录吗啡用量及疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)。结果:首先,两组术后3、6、12、24 h VAS平均评分差异无统计学意义,不同时间点比较具有可比性。ESPB组24 h吗啡用量显著高于ESPB组(P = 0.035)。block表演的持续时间也有显著差异,ESPB的表演时间更短(P <0.001)。两组患者的平均年龄、体重指数(BMI)和住院时间相似。结论:ESPB和TPVB均可为MRM患者提供充分的镇痛;但与ESPB相比,TPVB具有更好的疗效和阿片节约作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信