Physical Alteration of Prescription Opioids Prior to Ingestion: An Under-Recognized Risk of Prescription Opioid Nonmedical Use

{"title":"Physical Alteration of Prescription Opioids Prior to Ingestion: An Under-Recognized Risk of Prescription Opioid Nonmedical Use","authors":"","doi":"10.17756/jas.2023-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To examine the role of physical alteration of prescription opioids prior to ingestion (PAPO) as part of the current opioid public health crisis, this study compared biopsychosocial characteristics and behaviors among individuals who reported prescription opioid nonmedical use (NMU) via oral IN-TACT only, PAPO, and NONORAL routes of administration. Methods: A YouGov survey of the United States (US) general adult population (n = 24,000) captured demographics, polysubstance use, motivations for NMU, source of drug, age of first use, and environmental factors that influenced route of administration. Four mutually exclusive groups based on prescription opioid NMU routes of administration were compared. Results: Of the 4,590 that reported prescription opioid NMU: 3,477 (75.8%) reported prescription opioid NMU via oral INTACT only; 438 (9.5%) PAPO; 390 (8.5%) NONORAL; and 285 (6.2%) PAPO + NONORAL. Compared to the INTACT only group, PAPO and NONORAL groups reported higher prevalence of lifetime diagnosis of behavioral/mental health comorbidities, poly-substance use, and abuse-related motivations for NMU, as well as earlier age of substance use initiation and higher likelihood of obtaining drugs through illicit channels. Conclusions: PAPO group characteristics were highly consistent with NONORAL group and significantly different than INTACT group, therefore, PAPO should be considered a high-risk behavior and a potentially critical transition in substance use trajectories. This study cannot determine causality yet suggests a greater likelihood of additional high-risk behaviors in those that engage in PAPO. These findings highlight why PAPO should be as concerning as NON-ORAL use, as both are associated with underlying behavioral/mental health issues, polysubstance use, and associated high-risk behaviors.","PeriodicalId":93015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction science","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/jas.2023-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To examine the role of physical alteration of prescription opioids prior to ingestion (PAPO) as part of the current opioid public health crisis, this study compared biopsychosocial characteristics and behaviors among individuals who reported prescription opioid nonmedical use (NMU) via oral IN-TACT only, PAPO, and NONORAL routes of administration. Methods: A YouGov survey of the United States (US) general adult population (n = 24,000) captured demographics, polysubstance use, motivations for NMU, source of drug, age of first use, and environmental factors that influenced route of administration. Four mutually exclusive groups based on prescription opioid NMU routes of administration were compared. Results: Of the 4,590 that reported prescription opioid NMU: 3,477 (75.8%) reported prescription opioid NMU via oral INTACT only; 438 (9.5%) PAPO; 390 (8.5%) NONORAL; and 285 (6.2%) PAPO + NONORAL. Compared to the INTACT only group, PAPO and NONORAL groups reported higher prevalence of lifetime diagnosis of behavioral/mental health comorbidities, poly-substance use, and abuse-related motivations for NMU, as well as earlier age of substance use initiation and higher likelihood of obtaining drugs through illicit channels. Conclusions: PAPO group characteristics were highly consistent with NONORAL group and significantly different than INTACT group, therefore, PAPO should be considered a high-risk behavior and a potentially critical transition in substance use trajectories. This study cannot determine causality yet suggests a greater likelihood of additional high-risk behaviors in those that engage in PAPO. These findings highlight why PAPO should be as concerning as NON-ORAL use, as both are associated with underlying behavioral/mental health issues, polysubstance use, and associated high-risk behaviors.
摄入前处方阿片类药物的物理改变:处方阿片类药物非医疗使用的未被充分认识的风险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信