An evaluation of a violence reduction partnership network: mixed methods network analysis

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Dean Wilkinson, Alison Thompson, Debbie Kerslake, Isha Chopra, Sophie Badger
{"title":"An evaluation of a violence reduction partnership network: mixed methods network analysis","authors":"Dean Wilkinson, Alison Thompson, Debbie Kerslake, Isha Chopra, Sophie Badger","doi":"10.1108/sc-07-2023-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this paper was to report on the evaluation of the network and resources for violence prevention and reduction in the chosen area of focus. This area had experiences deprivation, significant implications due to Covid-19 restrictions and a lack of outdoor recreation space. Design/methodology/approach Network analysis methodologies are increasingly being used in criminological research and evaluations to assess the structures of social and economic networks. This study explored, using a mixed-methods network analysis methodology, the nature of the established violence reduction network in a specific geographical location in West Midlands. Findings A breadth of network activity is taking place across the community; however, the network analysis highlighted gaps in terms of specialist provision for early years and support from those with lived experience. It was perceived that a lack of continuity, in terms of changes in key roles, has affected the network. Funding mechanisms were perceived ineffective, and not encouraging of development of localisation services. Relationships between network members were predominantly positive with organisations having good communication and accessing support from one another; however, identifying shared goals and better collective working would benefit the network. Originality/value This study pioneers using an innovative, mixed methods network analysis to explore a public health approach to violence prevention and reduction. Quantitative data collection and analysis allowed for assessment of the networks capacity and density, whereas qualitative data provided insights and detailed accounts of how the network functions.","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-07-2023-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to report on the evaluation of the network and resources for violence prevention and reduction in the chosen area of focus. This area had experiences deprivation, significant implications due to Covid-19 restrictions and a lack of outdoor recreation space. Design/methodology/approach Network analysis methodologies are increasingly being used in criminological research and evaluations to assess the structures of social and economic networks. This study explored, using a mixed-methods network analysis methodology, the nature of the established violence reduction network in a specific geographical location in West Midlands. Findings A breadth of network activity is taking place across the community; however, the network analysis highlighted gaps in terms of specialist provision for early years and support from those with lived experience. It was perceived that a lack of continuity, in terms of changes in key roles, has affected the network. Funding mechanisms were perceived ineffective, and not encouraging of development of localisation services. Relationships between network members were predominantly positive with organisations having good communication and accessing support from one another; however, identifying shared goals and better collective working would benefit the network. Originality/value This study pioneers using an innovative, mixed methods network analysis to explore a public health approach to violence prevention and reduction. Quantitative data collection and analysis allowed for assessment of the networks capacity and density, whereas qualitative data provided insights and detailed accounts of how the network functions.
减少暴力伙伴关系网络的评估:混合方法网络分析
本文的目的是报告对所选重点领域预防和减少暴力的网络和资源的评价。由于Covid-19限制和缺乏户外娱乐空间,该地区经历了剥夺,受到重大影响。网络分析方法越来越多地被用于犯罪学研究和评价,以评估社会和经济网络的结构。本研究采用混合方法网络分析方法,探讨了西米德兰兹郡特定地理位置建立的减少暴力网络的性质。整个社区正在开展广泛的网络活动;然而,网络分析强调了在早期专家提供和有生活经验的人的支持方面的差距。人们认为,在关键角色的变动方面缺乏连续性已经影响到网络。筹资机制被认为是无效的,不鼓励发展本地化服务。网络成员之间的关系主要是积极的,组织之间有良好的沟通和相互支持;然而,确定共同目标和更好的集体工作将使网络受益。独创性/价值本研究率先采用创新的混合方法网络分析,探索预防和减少暴力的公共卫生方法。定量数据收集和分析允许评估网络容量和密度,而定性数据提供了对网络如何运作的见解和详细说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信