Tracking transparency: an exploratory review of Florida academic library privacy policies

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Emily Zoe Mann, Stephanie A. Jacobs, Kirsten M. Kinsley, Laura I. Spears
{"title":"Tracking transparency: an exploratory review of Florida academic library privacy policies","authors":"Emily Zoe Mann, Stephanie A. Jacobs, Kirsten M. Kinsley, Laura I. Spears","doi":"10.1108/ils-04-2023-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Building on past studies of library privacy policies, this review looks at how privacy information is shared at universities and colleges in the state of Florida. Beyond the question of whether a library-specific privacy policy exists, this review evaluates what is covered in the policies – whether topics such as how student data is stored, retained, de-identified and disposed of are broached in the statements, and whether specific data sets covering instruction, reference and surveillance are mentioned. The purpose of this study is to open the door to directed exploration into student awareness of privacy policies and spark conversation about positionality of libraries regarding privacy. Design/methodology/approach This review was done using a cross-sectional study design through observation of public-facing library privacy policies of higher education institutions in Florida. Findings Findings include that the majority of Florida academic libraries do not have a public-facing privacy policy. Only 15 out of the 70 schools reviewed had one. A large portion of those came from doctoral universities with associate’s colleges having none, and baccalaureate/associate’s colleges having only two. The policies that were in place tended to be institution-centered rather than patron-centered. Most categories of listed data collected were in the area of collections, website or computer usage. Originality/value The value of this review is that it adds to the literature studying privacy policies in academic libraries. Going forward, this research could address statewide practice in privacy policies as well as helping to lay pathways for working with students and other library patrons to gauge their interests and concerns about privacy.","PeriodicalId":44588,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-04-2023-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Building on past studies of library privacy policies, this review looks at how privacy information is shared at universities and colleges in the state of Florida. Beyond the question of whether a library-specific privacy policy exists, this review evaluates what is covered in the policies – whether topics such as how student data is stored, retained, de-identified and disposed of are broached in the statements, and whether specific data sets covering instruction, reference and surveillance are mentioned. The purpose of this study is to open the door to directed exploration into student awareness of privacy policies and spark conversation about positionality of libraries regarding privacy. Design/methodology/approach This review was done using a cross-sectional study design through observation of public-facing library privacy policies of higher education institutions in Florida. Findings Findings include that the majority of Florida academic libraries do not have a public-facing privacy policy. Only 15 out of the 70 schools reviewed had one. A large portion of those came from doctoral universities with associate’s colleges having none, and baccalaureate/associate’s colleges having only two. The policies that were in place tended to be institution-centered rather than patron-centered. Most categories of listed data collected were in the area of collections, website or computer usage. Originality/value The value of this review is that it adds to the literature studying privacy policies in academic libraries. Going forward, this research could address statewide practice in privacy policies as well as helping to lay pathways for working with students and other library patrons to gauge their interests and concerns about privacy.
追踪透明度:佛罗里达州学术图书馆隐私政策的探索性审查
在过去对图书馆隐私政策的研究的基础上,本综述着眼于如何在佛罗里达州的大学和学院共享隐私信息。除了图书馆特定的隐私政策是否存在的问题之外,本文还评估了政策中涵盖的内容——是否在声明中提出了诸如如何存储、保留、去识别和处理学生数据等主题,以及是否提到了涵盖指导、参考和监督的特定数据集。本研究的目的是为有针对性地探索学生对隐私政策的认识打开大门,并引发关于图书馆在隐私方面的立场的讨论。设计/方法/方法本研究采用横断面研究设计,通过观察佛罗里达州高等教育机构面向公众的图书馆隐私政策。调查结果包括,佛罗里达州的大多数学术图书馆没有面向公众的隐私政策。在接受调查的70所学校中,只有15所学校有。其中很大一部分来自博士院校,而副学院一个都没有,学士/副学院只有两个。这些政策往往是以制度为中心,而不是以赞助人为中心。所收集数据的大多数类别是在收集、网站或计算机使用方面。本综述的价值在于,它增加了研究学术图书馆隐私政策的文献。展望未来,这项研究可以解决全州范围内的隐私政策实践,并帮助与学生和其他图书馆顾客合作,以衡量他们对隐私的兴趣和关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Learning Sciences
Information and Learning Sciences INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Information and Learning Sciences advances inter-disciplinary research that explores scholarly intersections shared within 2 key fields: information science and the learning sciences / education sciences. The journal provides a publication venue for work that strengthens our scholarly understanding of human inquiry and learning phenomena, especially as they relate to design and uses of information and e-learning systems innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信