The Philosophical Context of Curriculum Innovations with a Focus on Competence Development

Peter Kondrla, Radoslav Lojan, Patrik Maturkanič, Yulia Nickolaeva Biryukova, Ernel González Mastrapa
{"title":"The Philosophical Context of Curriculum Innovations with a Focus on Competence Development","authors":"Peter Kondrla, Radoslav Lojan, Patrik Maturkanič, Yulia Nickolaeva Biryukova, Ernel González Mastrapa","doi":"10.15503/jecs2023.2.78.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The article describes the philosophical background of competency education and analyses the weaknesses that are present in curriculum changes, focusing on the absence of dynamic acceptance of otherness. Concept. The starting point is a reflection on the philosophical background of education as a repetition and production of the same. The basic principles of the post-metaphysical approach of education to otherness and the interpretation of the innovation curriculum in relation to these principles are presented. Results. Curricular changes and innovations appear to be cosmetic adjustments in which the traditional philosophical and pedagogical principles of passive reception of knowledge and acquisition of large amounts of knowledge are preserved. Conclusion. Changing the curriculum requires a change in teachers' attitudes as well as a change in the school education system. It is necessary to define who the teacher is, who the pupil is. Parents must identify with curricular reform and see it as a positive change for their children. Cognitive value. Curricular reform cannot be done without systemic changes in education. All participants in the change must be familiar with and identify with the new paradigm and its philosophical background, otherwise it will not be possible to realise the transition to competency pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":256704,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.2.78.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The article describes the philosophical background of competency education and analyses the weaknesses that are present in curriculum changes, focusing on the absence of dynamic acceptance of otherness. Concept. The starting point is a reflection on the philosophical background of education as a repetition and production of the same. The basic principles of the post-metaphysical approach of education to otherness and the interpretation of the innovation curriculum in relation to these principles are presented. Results. Curricular changes and innovations appear to be cosmetic adjustments in which the traditional philosophical and pedagogical principles of passive reception of knowledge and acquisition of large amounts of knowledge are preserved. Conclusion. Changing the curriculum requires a change in teachers' attitudes as well as a change in the school education system. It is necessary to define who the teacher is, who the pupil is. Parents must identify with curricular reform and see it as a positive change for their children. Cognitive value. Curricular reform cannot be done without systemic changes in education. All participants in the change must be familiar with and identify with the new paradigm and its philosophical background, otherwise it will not be possible to realise the transition to competency pedagogy.
以能力发展为核心的课程创新的哲学语境
的目标。本文描述了能力教育的哲学背景,并分析了课程改革中存在的弱点,重点是缺乏对他者的动态接受。的概念。本文的出发点是对教育作为一种重复和生产的哲学背景的反思。提出了后形而上学的他者教育方法的基本原则,以及与这些原则相关的创新课程的解释。结果。课程的变化和创新似乎是表面上的调整,其中保留了被动接受知识和获得大量知识的传统哲学和教学原则。结论。改变课程不仅需要改变教师的态度,也需要改变学校的教育制度。有必要明确谁是老师,谁是学生。家长必须认同课程改革,并将其视为对孩子的积极改变。认知价值。课程改革离不开教育体制的变革。变革的所有参与者都必须熟悉和认同新范式及其哲学背景,否则就不可能实现向能力教学法的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信