Awareness of future parents about vaccination

Q4 Medicine
A.M. Pugach, A.V. Bondarenko
{"title":"Awareness of future parents about vaccination","authors":"A.M. Pugach, A.V. Bondarenko","doi":"10.15574/sp.2023.133.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - to assess the intentions of students of different universities to vaccinate their future children and the factors that influence their decision. Materials and methods. A Google form with 20 questions was developed. The data were obtained from an online survey conducted among students who have not yet had children. The questions concerned the attitude to immunoprophylaxis, as well as information about the age, gender and occupation of the respondents (of particular interest are those who have or are obtaining a medical education). Results. A total of 145 students took part in the survey, including 79.5% from healthcare and 20.5% from non-healthcare sectors. The majority of those who took part in the survey were female, aged 18 to 30. According to the data, after giving birth to children, 77.2% of respondents expressed a desire to invest in disease prevention and enjoy a full life, while almost 8% consider it appropriate to treat diseases that have already occurred, and more than 14% are undecided about medical tactics. In general, 81% have a positive attitude towards vaccination; 16% have a reservation, more than 2% are undecided, and almost 1% have a negative attitude. According to the attitude towards vaccination of their future children, five distinct parental groups were identified among the respondents: “unquestioning acceptors” - 57% of respondents indicated that they intend to vaccinate their future children with all vaccines available in Ukraine, 43.9% - “cautious acceptors” - will choose only mandatory vaccinations; 8.8% are undecided and slightly less than 2% are “refusers” from all vaccines. The first place among the main reasons for refusing to vaccinate children is the fear of adverse reactions and post-vaccination complications; the second place is distrust of the manufacturer and the third is caution because of so-called contraindications. The survey also found that when determining contraindications to vaccinating an unborn child, respondents would most likely listen to the opinion of the following specialists: pediatrician - 87.7%; immunologist - 56.1%; family doctor - 46.5%. Conclusions. The level of awareness of vaccination among young people is generally satisfactory. There is no difference between doctors and non-physicians. To maximize protection of children from vaccine-preventable infections, pediatricians should effectively counsel parents on the benefits of vaccines and the risks of delaying or refusing vaccination. To increase understanding and benefit of vaccines among the general population and reduce vaccine hesitation/refusal, vaccine education should begin as part of a healthy lifestyle and disease prevention program long before university and continue after medical and non-medical training. Basic knowledge about vaccines should be included in the curriculum of not only medical but also non-medical universities. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.","PeriodicalId":34724,"journal":{"name":"Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15574/sp.2023.133.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - to assess the intentions of students of different universities to vaccinate their future children and the factors that influence their decision. Materials and methods. A Google form with 20 questions was developed. The data were obtained from an online survey conducted among students who have not yet had children. The questions concerned the attitude to immunoprophylaxis, as well as information about the age, gender and occupation of the respondents (of particular interest are those who have or are obtaining a medical education). Results. A total of 145 students took part in the survey, including 79.5% from healthcare and 20.5% from non-healthcare sectors. The majority of those who took part in the survey were female, aged 18 to 30. According to the data, after giving birth to children, 77.2% of respondents expressed a desire to invest in disease prevention and enjoy a full life, while almost 8% consider it appropriate to treat diseases that have already occurred, and more than 14% are undecided about medical tactics. In general, 81% have a positive attitude towards vaccination; 16% have a reservation, more than 2% are undecided, and almost 1% have a negative attitude. According to the attitude towards vaccination of their future children, five distinct parental groups were identified among the respondents: “unquestioning acceptors” - 57% of respondents indicated that they intend to vaccinate their future children with all vaccines available in Ukraine, 43.9% - “cautious acceptors” - will choose only mandatory vaccinations; 8.8% are undecided and slightly less than 2% are “refusers” from all vaccines. The first place among the main reasons for refusing to vaccinate children is the fear of adverse reactions and post-vaccination complications; the second place is distrust of the manufacturer and the third is caution because of so-called contraindications. The survey also found that when determining contraindications to vaccinating an unborn child, respondents would most likely listen to the opinion of the following specialists: pediatrician - 87.7%; immunologist - 56.1%; family doctor - 46.5%. Conclusions. The level of awareness of vaccination among young people is generally satisfactory. There is no difference between doctors and non-physicians. To maximize protection of children from vaccine-preventable infections, pediatricians should effectively counsel parents on the benefits of vaccines and the risks of delaying or refusing vaccination. To increase understanding and benefit of vaccines among the general population and reduce vaccine hesitation/refusal, vaccine education should begin as part of a healthy lifestyle and disease prevention program long before university and continue after medical and non-medical training. Basic knowledge about vaccines should be included in the curriculum of not only medical but also non-medical universities. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.
提高未来父母对疫苗接种的认识
目的-评估不同大学的学生为他们未来的孩子接种疫苗的意图和影响他们决定的因素。材料和方法。开发了一个包含20个问题的谷歌表单。这些数据来自一项对尚未生育的学生进行的在线调查。这些问题涉及对免疫预防的态度,以及关于答复者的年龄、性别和职业的信息(特别感兴趣的是那些接受过或正在接受医学教育的人)。结果。共有145名学生参与了调查,其中79.5%来自医疗保健行业,20.5%来自非医疗保健行业。参与调查的大多数是年龄在18到30岁之间的女性。数据显示,生完孩子后,77.2%的受访者表示希望投资于疾病预防,享受完整的生活,而近8%的受访者认为治疗已经发生的疾病是合适的,超过14%的受访者对医疗策略犹豫不决。总体而言,81%的人对疫苗接种持积极态度;16%的人预订了房间,超过2%的人尚未决定,近1%的人持负面态度。根据对未来子女接种疫苗的态度,答复者中确定了五个不同的父母群体:"绝对接受者"————57%的答复者表示,他们打算为未来子女接种乌克兰现有的所有疫苗,43.9%————"谨慎接受者"————将只选择强制性疫苗接种;8.8%的人尚未决定,略低于2%的人“拒绝”接种所有疫苗。在拒绝为儿童接种疫苗的主要原因中,首要原因是害怕不良反应和接种后并发症;第二是对制造商的不信任,第三是由于所谓的禁忌症而谨慎。调查还发现,在确定未出生婴儿接种疫苗的禁忌症时,受访者最有可能听取以下专家的意见:儿科医生- 87.7%;免疫学家- 56.1%;家庭医生——46.5%。结论。年轻人对疫苗接种的认识水平总体上令人满意。医生和非医生之间没有区别。为了最大限度地保护儿童免受疫苗可预防的感染,儿科医生应有效地就疫苗的益处和延迟或拒绝接种疫苗的风险向家长提供咨询。为了增加普通人群对疫苗的了解和受益,减少疫苗犹豫/拒绝,疫苗教育应该早在大学之前就开始,作为健康生活方式和疾病预防计划的一部分,并在医学和非医学培训后继续进行。疫苗的基本知识不仅应纳入医学院校的课程,也应纳入非医学院校的课程。这项研究是按照《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则进行的。研究方案经参与机构当地伦理委员会批准。作者未声明存在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina
Suchasna pediatriia Ukrayina Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信