Transient ischemic dilation ratio thresholds in patients with zero coronary calcium score undergoing exercise or dipyridamole stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging using a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera
{"title":"Transient ischemic dilation ratio thresholds in patients with zero coronary calcium score undergoing exercise or dipyridamole stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging using a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera","authors":"Eran Wen Jun Sim, Min Sen Yew","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims Transient ischaemic dilation (TID) is a marker of underlying extensive coronary artery disease (CAD) during myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The cut-off for a normal TID ratio (TIDr) value is often derived from a cohort of individuals with no apparent CAD. Varying criteria have been used to define the absence of CAD. We aim to derive TIDr cut-offs using patients with normal MPI and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of zero, and compare the TIDr obtained from different software packages. Methods and results We studied 232 patients with zero CAC and normal MPI undergoing exercise or dipyridamole stress using either a 1- or 2-day protocol. All patients were scanned in the supine position with a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera. TIDr was automatically generated using quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) software initially, and subsequently using Myometrix for comparison. The TIDr cut-offs calculated using the mean + 2 standard deviation were 1.29 and 1.24 for the 1- and 2-day protocol groups, respectively. In patients undergoing a 2-day protocol, dipyridamole stress resulted in significantly higher mean TIDr when compared to exercise stress (1.07 ± 0.13 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12, P = 0.035). Myometrix-derived TIDr were also significantly lower compared to QPS-derived values for most protocols except for 2-day exercise stress. Conclusion This study is the first to derive TIDr threshold values using a normal population defined by zero CAC and normal MPI. TIDr was found to vary depending on stress modality, protocol as well as the software used.","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Aims Transient ischaemic dilation (TID) is a marker of underlying extensive coronary artery disease (CAD) during myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The cut-off for a normal TID ratio (TIDr) value is often derived from a cohort of individuals with no apparent CAD. Varying criteria have been used to define the absence of CAD. We aim to derive TIDr cut-offs using patients with normal MPI and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of zero, and compare the TIDr obtained from different software packages. Methods and results We studied 232 patients with zero CAC and normal MPI undergoing exercise or dipyridamole stress using either a 1- or 2-day protocol. All patients were scanned in the supine position with a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera. TIDr was automatically generated using quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) software initially, and subsequently using Myometrix for comparison. The TIDr cut-offs calculated using the mean + 2 standard deviation were 1.29 and 1.24 for the 1- and 2-day protocol groups, respectively. In patients undergoing a 2-day protocol, dipyridamole stress resulted in significantly higher mean TIDr when compared to exercise stress (1.07 ± 0.13 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12, P = 0.035). Myometrix-derived TIDr were also significantly lower compared to QPS-derived values for most protocols except for 2-day exercise stress. Conclusion This study is the first to derive TIDr threshold values using a normal population defined by zero CAC and normal MPI. TIDr was found to vary depending on stress modality, protocol as well as the software used.