The Perpetrator-Centered Narrative of the Holocaust in Social Studies Standards: A Case Study of South Carolina

Jeffrey C. Eargle
{"title":"The Perpetrator-Centered Narrative of the Holocaust in Social Studies Standards: A Case Study of South Carolina","authors":"Jeffrey C. Eargle","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2023.2269907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this study, I used a critical analysis approach to identify and examine the perpetrator- and victim-centered perspectives within the Holocaust narrative of the 2019 South Carolina Social Studies College- and Career-Ready Standards. Given the recent revision of the standards, I compared the 2019 standards to the 2011 South Carolina Social Studies Academic Standards to identify shifts in the prescribed Holocaust narrative. Because the 2019 standards are inquiry-based, I explored the role of perpetrator-centered narratives in relation to inquiry goals. Past studies of the Holocaust in state standards and materials focused on accurate content inclusion. However, using Rubin’s (Citation2020) Jewish critical race framework, this study moves the research in a new direction by examining the text of the Holocaust content in standards for culturally inclusive narratives. The findings of this study indicate that the Holocaust narrative in the 2019 standards was predominantly perpetrator-centered, thereby the marginalization of Jewish voices was embedded in the standards. The findings also demonstrate that developing inquiry-based standards does not guarantee the expulsion of oppressive narratives from standards documents.Keywords: Holocaust educationsocial studies standardssocial studies curriculumdominant narrativescounternarratives Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":93719,"journal":{"name":"Social studies (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1953)","volume":"33 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social studies (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2023.2269907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, I used a critical analysis approach to identify and examine the perpetrator- and victim-centered perspectives within the Holocaust narrative of the 2019 South Carolina Social Studies College- and Career-Ready Standards. Given the recent revision of the standards, I compared the 2019 standards to the 2011 South Carolina Social Studies Academic Standards to identify shifts in the prescribed Holocaust narrative. Because the 2019 standards are inquiry-based, I explored the role of perpetrator-centered narratives in relation to inquiry goals. Past studies of the Holocaust in state standards and materials focused on accurate content inclusion. However, using Rubin’s (Citation2020) Jewish critical race framework, this study moves the research in a new direction by examining the text of the Holocaust content in standards for culturally inclusive narratives. The findings of this study indicate that the Holocaust narrative in the 2019 standards was predominantly perpetrator-centered, thereby the marginalization of Jewish voices was embedded in the standards. The findings also demonstrate that developing inquiry-based standards does not guarantee the expulsion of oppressive narratives from standards documents.Keywords: Holocaust educationsocial studies standardssocial studies curriculumdominant narrativescounternarratives Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
社会研究标准中以肇事者为中心的大屠杀叙事:南卡罗来纳州的案例研究
在这项研究中,我使用了一种批判性分析方法来识别和检查2019年南卡罗来纳州社会研究学院和职业准备标准大屠杀叙事中以肇事者和受害者为中心的观点。鉴于最近对标准进行了修订,我将2019年的标准与2011年南卡罗来纳州社会研究学术标准进行了比较,以确定规定的大屠杀叙述中的变化。因为2019年的标准是以探究为基础的,所以我探讨了以肇事者为中心的叙述在探究目标中的作用。过去在国家标准和材料中对大屠杀的研究侧重于准确地包含内容。然而,本研究使用鲁宾(Citation2020)的犹太批判种族框架,通过在文化包容性叙事的标准下检查大屠杀内容的文本,将研究推向了一个新的方向。本研究的结果表明,2019年标准中的大屠杀叙事主要以肇事者为中心,因此犹太人声音的边缘化嵌入了标准中。研究结果还表明,制定基于调查的标准并不能保证从标准文件中驱逐压迫性叙述。关键词:大屠杀教育社会研究标准社会研究课程主导叙事反叙事披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信