Reducing teachers’ workload or deskilling ‘core’ work? Analysis of a policy response to teacher workload demands

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Meghan Stacey, Mihajla Gavin, Scott Fitzgerald, Susan McGrath-Champ, Rachel Wilson
{"title":"Reducing teachers’ workload or deskilling ‘core’ work? Analysis of a policy response to teacher workload demands","authors":"Meghan Stacey, Mihajla Gavin, Scott Fitzgerald, Susan McGrath-Champ, Rachel Wilson","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2023.2271856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTeacher workload is a growing problem internationally. In this article, we analyse an attempt by the state education bureaucracy of New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to address this through the ‘Quality Time Program’. Drawing on labour process theory and Carol Bacchi’s framework of ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’, we analyse how the Quality Time policy documents conceptualise and aim to address a particular kind of teacher ‘workload problem’. We argue the policy defines the ‘problem’ as one of efficiency. At the same time, through use of the category of ‘administration’ the policy proposes the reduction of ‘core’ work, such as lesson planning, representing a potential deskilling of teachers. We argue that policies such as the Quality Time Program reflect the way in which teachers’ work is emerging as a site of contestation in the context of workload reduction efforts, requiring ongoing monitoring and analysis.KEYWORDS: Teacherschoolwork intensificationdeskillingpolicy analysisworkload Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47908,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","volume":"20 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2023.2271856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTTeacher workload is a growing problem internationally. In this article, we analyse an attempt by the state education bureaucracy of New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to address this through the ‘Quality Time Program’. Drawing on labour process theory and Carol Bacchi’s framework of ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’, we analyse how the Quality Time policy documents conceptualise and aim to address a particular kind of teacher ‘workload problem’. We argue the policy defines the ‘problem’ as one of efficiency. At the same time, through use of the category of ‘administration’ the policy proposes the reduction of ‘core’ work, such as lesson planning, representing a potential deskilling of teachers. We argue that policies such as the Quality Time Program reflect the way in which teachers’ work is emerging as a site of contestation in the context of workload reduction efforts, requiring ongoing monitoring and analysis.KEYWORDS: Teacherschoolwork intensificationdeskillingpolicy analysisworkload Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
减轻教师的工作量或弱化“核心”工作?对教师工作量需求的政策回应分析
摘要教师工作量问题在国际上日益突出。在本文中,我们分析了澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)国家教育机构通过“优质时间计划”解决这一问题的尝试。借鉴劳动过程理论和卡罗尔·巴奇的“问题代表了什么?”,我们分析了优质时间政策文件是如何概念化和旨在解决特定类型的教师“工作量问题”的。我们认为,该政策将“问题”定义为效率问题。同时,通过使用“行政”类别,该政策建议减少“核心”工作,例如课程规划,代表了教师的潜在技能。我们认为,像“优质时间计划”这样的政策反映了教师的工作在减少工作量的背景下正在成为争论的焦点,需要持续的监测和分析。关键词:教师课业强化、技能政策分析、工作量披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Discourse is an international, fully peer-reviewed journal publishing contemporary research and theorising in the cultural politics of education. The journal publishes academic articles from throughout the world which contribute to contemporary debates on the new social, cultural and political configurations that now mark education as a highly contested but important cultural site. Discourse adopts a broadly critical orientation, but is not tied to any particular ideological, disciplinary or methodological position. It encourages interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of educational theory, policy and practice. It welcomes papers which explore speculative ideas in education, are written in innovative ways, or are presented in experimental ways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信