Party and electoral landscape in the regions of the Russian federation: stability versus volatility : stability versus volatility

P. Panov
{"title":"Party and electoral landscape in the regions of the Russian federation: stability versus volatility : stability versus volatility","authors":"P. Panov","doi":"10.7242/2658-705x/2023.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regions of Russia demonstrate a high degree of variability in voting for political parties in elections at various levels. This is explained by the fact that in regions with a «hard» political regime, the ruling party dominates the political space, while in «softer» regimes there is a certain degree of electoral competition. In this paper, based on the results of voting for party lists in the elections of the State Duma of the Russian Federation and regional parliaments for the period from 2007 to 2021, it is analyzed how stable the variability of the party and electoral landscape in the constituent entities is, and how the degree of dominance of the ruling party affects the volatility of regional party systems. The analysis shows that the greatest stability is demonstrated by the regions with a «hard» political regime, while the highest volatility of regional party systems is characteristic of the regions with the most «soft» regime. This is explained by the fact that in most constituent entities of the Russian Federation none of the parties of the systemic opposition is perceived as an obvious alternative to the party of power. As a result, «protest votes» are distributed either among all opposition parties, or go to one or the other party, and differently indifferent regions and in different elections. At the same time, in some regions there are fairly strongregional branches of one or another opposition party, which becomes the «main opposition» in the region and, as a rule, receives the votes lost by other parties.","PeriodicalId":489699,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo federalʹnogo issledovatelʹskogo centra","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo federalʹnogo issledovatelʹskogo centra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7242/2658-705x/2023.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regions of Russia demonstrate a high degree of variability in voting for political parties in elections at various levels. This is explained by the fact that in regions with a «hard» political regime, the ruling party dominates the political space, while in «softer» regimes there is a certain degree of electoral competition. In this paper, based on the results of voting for party lists in the elections of the State Duma of the Russian Federation and regional parliaments for the period from 2007 to 2021, it is analyzed how stable the variability of the party and electoral landscape in the constituent entities is, and how the degree of dominance of the ruling party affects the volatility of regional party systems. The analysis shows that the greatest stability is demonstrated by the regions with a «hard» political regime, while the highest volatility of regional party systems is characteristic of the regions with the most «soft» regime. This is explained by the fact that in most constituent entities of the Russian Federation none of the parties of the systemic opposition is perceived as an obvious alternative to the party of power. As a result, «protest votes» are distributed either among all opposition parties, or go to one or the other party, and differently indifferent regions and in different elections. At the same time, in some regions there are fairly strongregional branches of one or another opposition party, which becomes the «main opposition» in the region and, as a rule, receives the votes lost by other parties.
俄罗斯联邦各地区的政党和选举格局:稳定与动荡:稳定与动荡
俄罗斯各地区在各级选举中对政党的投票表现出高度的差异。这可以用以下事实来解释:在“硬”政权的地区,执政党主导着政治空间,而在“软”政权中,存在一定程度的选举竞争。本文基于2007年至2021年期间俄罗斯联邦国家杜马和地区议会选举中政党名单的投票结果,分析了组成实体中政党和选举格局的稳定性,以及执政党的主导程度如何影响地区政党制度的波动性。分析表明,具有“硬”政权的地区表现出最大的稳定性,而具有最“软”政权的地区则表现出最高的区域政党制度波动性。这可以从以下事实得到解释:在俄罗斯联邦的大多数组成实体中,没有任何一个系统性反对派政党被认为是执政党的明显替代品。因此,“抗议票”要么分配给所有反对党,要么分配给其中一个或另一个政党,而且在不同的地区和不同的选举中也有所不同。与此同时,在一些地区,一个或另一个反对党有相当强大的地区分支,成为该地区的“主要反对派”,通常会获得其他政党失去的选票。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信