Stigmatization of patients with neurocognitive disorder

Adriana Mihai, Horia Marchean, Rebeca-Isabela Avărvăroaei, Dan-Valeriu-Nicolae Molnar
{"title":"Stigmatization of patients with neurocognitive disorder","authors":"Adriana Mihai, Horia Marchean, Rebeca-Isabela Avărvăroaei, Dan-Valeriu-Nicolae Molnar","doi":"10.26416/psih.74.3.2023.8665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. The scientific literature in the field of stigmatization is deficient, especially when we address a special category of population, such as that of patients with neurocognitive disorder. Starting with the hypothesis that patients with neurocognitive disorder are stigmatized in the Romanian society, we aimed to validate or infirm this hypothesis. Materials and method. We used a stigma and self-stigma highlighting questionnaire distributed both online (using the mediatic channels) and in physical format, on paper, distributed by doctors and medical staff, addressed to people with a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder or their relatives from Mureş County. The respondent group was divided according to demographic characteristics in order to highlight the attitude and stigmatization of the patient with neurocognitive disorder. Two questionnaires were distributed, one for patients and one for relatives, the one for patients also including specific questions for self-stigma. Correlations were made with the social, financial and professional status of the respondents, the statistical analysis using the SPSS program. Results. The results identified both areas in which patients and relatives noticed stigma and their qualitative descriptions, but also the factors that contribute to the stigma and self-stigma of the patient with neurocognitive disorder. The hypothesis was validated. The identification of level of stigma and self-stigma in patients with neurocognitive disorders from this region is important because it is well known that it contributes significantly to the decrease in the quality of life of these people. Conclusions. The present study identifies the factors that require intervention from society, both through educational measures and through other measures of social nature.","PeriodicalId":34486,"journal":{"name":"Psihiatruro","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihiatruro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26416/psih.74.3.2023.8665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. The scientific literature in the field of stigmatization is deficient, especially when we address a special category of population, such as that of patients with neurocognitive disorder. Starting with the hypothesis that patients with neurocognitive disorder are stigmatized in the Romanian society, we aimed to validate or infirm this hypothesis. Materials and method. We used a stigma and self-stigma highlighting questionnaire distributed both online (using the mediatic channels) and in physical format, on paper, distributed by doctors and medical staff, addressed to people with a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder or their relatives from Mureş County. The respondent group was divided according to demographic characteristics in order to highlight the attitude and stigmatization of the patient with neurocognitive disorder. Two questionnaires were distributed, one for patients and one for relatives, the one for patients also including specific questions for self-stigma. Correlations were made with the social, financial and professional status of the respondents, the statistical analysis using the SPSS program. Results. The results identified both areas in which patients and relatives noticed stigma and their qualitative descriptions, but also the factors that contribute to the stigma and self-stigma of the patient with neurocognitive disorder. The hypothesis was validated. The identification of level of stigma and self-stigma in patients with neurocognitive disorders from this region is important because it is well known that it contributes significantly to the decrease in the quality of life of these people. Conclusions. The present study identifies the factors that require intervention from society, both through educational measures and through other measures of social nature.
对神经认知障碍患者的污名化
目标。在污名化领域的科学文献是缺乏的,特别是当我们处理一个特殊类别的人群时,比如神经认知障碍患者。从神经认知障碍患者在罗马尼亚社会中被污名化的假设开始,我们旨在验证或削弱这一假设。材料和方法。我们使用了一份强调病耻感和自我病耻感的调查问卷,通过在线(使用中介渠道)和纸质形式分发,由医生和医务人员分发给来自穆雷伊县的神经认知障碍诊断患者或其亲属。根据人口学特征划分应答组,以突出神经认知障碍患者的态度和污名化。发放了两份问卷,一份给患者,一份给亲属,其中一份给患者也包含了关于自我耻辱感的具体问题。用SPSS软件对被调查者的社会、经济和职业状况进行相关分析。结果。结果确定了患者和亲属注意到耻辱的领域及其定性描述,以及导致神经认知障碍患者耻辱和自我耻辱的因素。这个假设被证实了。识别来自该地区的神经认知障碍患者的耻辱感和自我耻辱感水平很重要,因为众所周知,这对这些人的生活质量下降有重要影响。结论。本研究确定了需要社会通过教育措施和其他社会性质措施进行干预的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信