Optimal capital adequacy ratios for banks

Henrik Andersen , Ragnar Enger Juelsrud
{"title":"Optimal capital adequacy ratios for banks","authors":"Henrik Andersen ,&nbsp;Ragnar Enger Juelsrud","doi":"10.1016/j.latcb.2023.100107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we analyse the appropriate capital adequacy ratio for banks from a socio-economic perspective. More equity capital in banks can contribute to financial stability by reducing the risk of costly banking crises, but lending may become more expensive if banks are required finance their assets with more equity. When assessing optimal capital adequacy ratios, the economic costs of more expensive credit must therefore be weighed against the benefits of fewer and less costly banking crises. Importantly, we compute optimal capital adequacy ratios for Norway which allows us to take into account recent changes in bank capital regulation. The results indicate that banks should have a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of between 12 and 19 percent. The current CET1 ratio of around 18 percent in our sample is in line with this. Our estimates are consistent with results from international studies, but estimates vary considerably with changes in uncertain assumptions. However, banks’ capital needs during the Nordic banking crisis in the beginning of the 1990s show that such estimates are not unreasonable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100867,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143823000285/pdfft?md5=ffa04c4b35b61ca7ddd7b341493f0f66&pid=1-s2.0-S2666143823000285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666143823000285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we analyse the appropriate capital adequacy ratio for banks from a socio-economic perspective. More equity capital in banks can contribute to financial stability by reducing the risk of costly banking crises, but lending may become more expensive if banks are required finance their assets with more equity. When assessing optimal capital adequacy ratios, the economic costs of more expensive credit must therefore be weighed against the benefits of fewer and less costly banking crises. Importantly, we compute optimal capital adequacy ratios for Norway which allows us to take into account recent changes in bank capital regulation. The results indicate that banks should have a Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of between 12 and 19 percent. The current CET1 ratio of around 18 percent in our sample is in line with this. Our estimates are consistent with results from international studies, but estimates vary considerably with changes in uncertain assumptions. However, banks’ capital needs during the Nordic banking crisis in the beginning of the 1990s show that such estimates are not unreasonable.

银行的最佳资本充足率
本文从社会经济角度分析了银行的适当资本充足率。银行增加股本可以降低代价高昂的银行危机风险,从而促进金融稳定,但如果要求银行用更多股本为资产融资,贷款成本可能会更高。因此,在评估最佳资本充足率时,必须权衡更昂贵的信贷所带来的经济成本与更少、更低成本的银行危机所带来的收益。重要的是,我们计算了挪威的最优资本充足率,从而将近期银行资本监管的变化考虑在内。结果表明,银行的普通股一级资本(CET1)比率应在12%至19%之间。在我们的样本中,目前的 CET1 比率约为 18%,与此相符。我们的估算结果与国际研究结果一致,但随着不确定假设的变化,估算结果也有很大差异。不过,20 世纪 90 年代初北欧银行业危机期间银行的资本需求表明,这种估计并非不合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信