Evaluation of Short-Term Rockburst Risk Severity Using Machine Learning Methods

IF 3.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Aibing Jin, Prabhat Basnet, Shakil Mahtab
{"title":"Evaluation of Short-Term Rockburst Risk Severity Using Machine Learning Methods","authors":"Aibing Jin, Prabhat Basnet, Shakil Mahtab","doi":"10.3390/bdcc7040172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In deep engineering, rockburst hazards frequently result in injuries, fatalities, and the destruction of contiguous structures. Due to the complex nature of rockbursts, predicting the severity of rockburst damage (intensity) without the aid of computer models is challenging. Although there are various predictive models in existence, effectively identifying the risk severity in imbalanced data remains crucial. The ensemble boosting method is often better suited to dealing with unequally distributed classes than are classical models. Therefore, this paper employs the ensemble categorical gradient boosting (CGB) method to predict short-term rockburst risk severity. After data collection, principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to avoid the redundancies caused by multi-collinearity. Afterwards, the CGB was trained on PCA data, optimal hyper-parameters were retrieved using the grid-search technique to predict the test samples, and performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. The results showed that the PCA-CGB model achieved better results in prediction than did the single CGB model or conventional boosting methods. The model achieved an F1 score of 0.8952, indicating that the proposed model is robust in predicting damage severity given an imbalanced dataset. This work provides practical guidance in risk management.","PeriodicalId":36397,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7040172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In deep engineering, rockburst hazards frequently result in injuries, fatalities, and the destruction of contiguous structures. Due to the complex nature of rockbursts, predicting the severity of rockburst damage (intensity) without the aid of computer models is challenging. Although there are various predictive models in existence, effectively identifying the risk severity in imbalanced data remains crucial. The ensemble boosting method is often better suited to dealing with unequally distributed classes than are classical models. Therefore, this paper employs the ensemble categorical gradient boosting (CGB) method to predict short-term rockburst risk severity. After data collection, principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to avoid the redundancies caused by multi-collinearity. Afterwards, the CGB was trained on PCA data, optimal hyper-parameters were retrieved using the grid-search technique to predict the test samples, and performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. The results showed that the PCA-CGB model achieved better results in prediction than did the single CGB model or conventional boosting methods. The model achieved an F1 score of 0.8952, indicating that the proposed model is robust in predicting damage severity given an imbalanced dataset. This work provides practical guidance in risk management.
利用机器学习方法评估短期岩爆风险严重程度
在深部工程中,岩爆灾害经常造成人员伤亡和相邻结构的破坏。由于岩爆的复杂性,在没有计算机模型的帮助下预测岩爆损伤的严重程度(强度)是具有挑战性的。尽管存在各种预测模型,但有效识别不平衡数据中的风险严重程度仍然至关重要。集成增强方法通常比经典模型更适合于处理不均匀分布的类。因此,本文采用集合分类梯度提升法(CGB)预测短期岩爆风险严重程度。数据采集后,采用主成分分析(PCA)避免多重共线性造成的冗余。然后,在PCA数据上对CGB进行训练,使用网格搜索技术检索最优超参数来预测测试样本,并使用精度、召回率和F1分数指标来评估性能。结果表明,PCA-CGB模型的预测效果优于单一CGB模型或常规助推方法。该模型的F1得分为0.8952,表明该模型在不平衡数据集下预测损伤严重程度具有鲁棒性。这项工作为风险管理提供了实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Big Data and Cognitive Computing Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信