Numerical Iterative Analysis of Drag Reduction System for a Racing Car Rear Wing

Q3 Engineering
Carlos Monteiro, Moisés Brito, Diana Filipa da Conceição Vieira
{"title":"Numerical Iterative Analysis of Drag Reduction System for a Racing Car Rear Wing","authors":"Carlos Monteiro, Moisés Brito, Diana Filipa da Conceição Vieira","doi":"10.4271/2023-01-5079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div class=\"section abstract\"><div class=\"htmlview paragraph\">In Formula Student competitions, the active adaptation of the aerodynamic components to the current race track conditions can significantly enhance the overall dynamic performance of the car. Due to the abundant low-speed corners, angles of attack of fixed aerodynamic components are usually exaggerated, preventing the car from achieving higher acceleration capabilities due to induced drag. This issue can be tackled by introducing an active drag reduction system (DRS). In this work, a strategy for performing iterative numerical simulations is proposed, with the goal of obtaining a range of different configurations suitable for certain track conditions. Specifically, the case of lowest drag is exploited.</div><div class=\"htmlview paragraph\">Different macros were developed to couple the utilization of computational fluid dynamics tools for aerodynamic analysis with an extensive iterative process with minimal user interference. An initial mesh refinement study was conducted. Afterward, angles of attack and centers of rotation of the two most rear flaps are iterated. The lowest-drag configuration was found to be at <i>α</i><sub><i>flap</i><sub>1</sub></sub> = 0° and <i>α</i><sub><i>flap</i><sub>2</sub></sub> = −6 ° , the latter mostly due to its aerodynamic interaction with the rest of the system. Results show that the angle of attack of flap 2 had the most influence on the overall forces, while varying the centers of rotation had a weaker impact. Nevertheless, combining the investigation of the angles of the attack with the center of rotation yields optimal DRS configuration with the minimum drag. Within one loop of the proposed strategy, a reduction of up to 94<i>.</i>5% in rear-wing drag was found. The strategy proposed can be looped until a configuration is obtained for specific optimization targets, such as drag reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38377,"journal":{"name":"SAE Technical Papers","volume":"41 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE Technical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-01-5079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Formula Student competitions, the active adaptation of the aerodynamic components to the current race track conditions can significantly enhance the overall dynamic performance of the car. Due to the abundant low-speed corners, angles of attack of fixed aerodynamic components are usually exaggerated, preventing the car from achieving higher acceleration capabilities due to induced drag. This issue can be tackled by introducing an active drag reduction system (DRS). In this work, a strategy for performing iterative numerical simulations is proposed, with the goal of obtaining a range of different configurations suitable for certain track conditions. Specifically, the case of lowest drag is exploited.
Different macros were developed to couple the utilization of computational fluid dynamics tools for aerodynamic analysis with an extensive iterative process with minimal user interference. An initial mesh refinement study was conducted. Afterward, angles of attack and centers of rotation of the two most rear flaps are iterated. The lowest-drag configuration was found to be at αflap1 = 0° and αflap2 = −6 ° , the latter mostly due to its aerodynamic interaction with the rest of the system. Results show that the angle of attack of flap 2 had the most influence on the overall forces, while varying the centers of rotation had a weaker impact. Nevertheless, combining the investigation of the angles of the attack with the center of rotation yields optimal DRS configuration with the minimum drag. Within one loop of the proposed strategy, a reduction of up to 94.5% in rear-wing drag was found. The strategy proposed can be looped until a configuration is obtained for specific optimization targets, such as drag reduction.
某赛车尾翼减阻系统的数值迭代分析
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview段落">在学生方程式比赛中,空气动力学部件主动适应当前赛道条件,可以显著提高赛车的整体动态性能。由于大量的低速弯道,固定气动元件的迎角通常被夸大,阻止了汽车获得更高的加速能力,由于诱导阻力。这个问题可以通过引入主动减阻系统(DRS)来解决。在这项工作中,提出了一种进行迭代数值模拟的策略,目标是获得适合特定轨道条件的一系列不同配置。具体来说,我们利用了最小阻力的情况。</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">我们开发了不同的宏,将计算流体动力学工具用于气动分析的利用与用户干扰最小的广泛迭代过程相结合。进行了初步的网格细化研究。然后,迭代两个最后襟翼的攻角和旋转中心。最小阻力配置为<i>α</i><sub><i>flap</i><sub>1</sub></sub>= 0°和& lt; i>α& lt; / i> & lt; sub> & lt; i> flap< / i> & lt; sub> 2 & lt; / sub> & lt; / sub>=−6°,后者主要是由于其与系统其余部分的气动相互作用。结果表明,皮瓣2的攻角对整体受力影响最大,而改变旋转中心对整体受力影响较小。然而,结合对攻击角度和旋转中心的研究,得出了具有最小阻力的最佳DRS配置。在提出的策略的一个循环中,发现后翼阻力减少了高达94<i>; </i>5%。所提出的策略可以循环,直到获得特定优化目标的配置,例如减阻。</div> /div>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAE Technical Papers
SAE Technical Papers Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1487
期刊介绍: SAE Technical Papers are written and peer-reviewed by experts in the automotive, aerospace, and commercial vehicle industries. Browse the more than 102,000 technical papers and journal articles on the latest advances in technical research and applied technical engineering information below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信