Comparative Study On the Academic Performance of Day Scholar and Hostel Medical Undergraduate Students

IF 0.2
G. Priyanka, M. Kumaresan, Sangeetha Achuthan, Chaturitha. K, Gunapriya Raghunath
{"title":"Comparative Study On the Academic Performance of Day Scholar and Hostel Medical Undergraduate Students","authors":"G. Priyanka, M. Kumaresan, Sangeetha Achuthan, Chaturitha. K, Gunapriya Raghunath","doi":"10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.5.l392-l398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examinations are the greater source of anxiety in medical education, and they can be greatly affected by the residential status of medical students. The study compares the academic performance between the day scholar students and the hostelers pursuing the first year of MBBS. This study was conducted at Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, India. Assessment of the marks obtained by both groups of students was done. Two exams, one theory and one practical exam, including viva voce, were taken for analysis. All 149 students attended both exams. Students in both categories were divided into 4 groups according to the marks obtained. Students who obtained < 50% marks were categorized as Group A, 50 to 69 % as Group B, 70% to 89% as Group C, and> 90% as Group D. In this study, 149 students participated. Among these, 82 students (55.03%) were day scholars, and 67 (44.96%) were hostelers. In the theory exam, 59.8% of day scholars belonged to Group B compared to 55.2% of hostelers. Only 6.09% of day scholar students were in group A as opposed to 19.4% of Hostelers in the same group. In Practical exams, amongst day scholars, 52.4% were in group B compared to 46.2% of hostelers in the same group. Only 4.9% of day scholars were in Group A as opposed to 19.4% of hostelers in the same group. There was a significant difference academically between the two groups of students involved in this study. The day scholars performed better than Hostelers in academics.","PeriodicalId":44665,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Life Science and Pharma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.5.l392-l398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examinations are the greater source of anxiety in medical education, and they can be greatly affected by the residential status of medical students. The study compares the academic performance between the day scholar students and the hostelers pursuing the first year of MBBS. This study was conducted at Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, India. Assessment of the marks obtained by both groups of students was done. Two exams, one theory and one practical exam, including viva voce, were taken for analysis. All 149 students attended both exams. Students in both categories were divided into 4 groups according to the marks obtained. Students who obtained < 50% marks were categorized as Group A, 50 to 69 % as Group B, 70% to 89% as Group C, and> 90% as Group D. In this study, 149 students participated. Among these, 82 students (55.03%) were day scholars, and 67 (44.96%) were hostelers. In the theory exam, 59.8% of day scholars belonged to Group B compared to 55.2% of hostelers. Only 6.09% of day scholar students were in group A as opposed to 19.4% of Hostelers in the same group. In Practical exams, amongst day scholars, 52.4% were in group B compared to 46.2% of hostelers in the same group. Only 4.9% of day scholars were in Group A as opposed to 19.4% of hostelers in the same group. There was a significant difference academically between the two groups of students involved in this study. The day scholars performed better than Hostelers in academics.
走读生与住校医本科生学习成绩的比较研究
考试是医学教育中更大的焦虑来源,医学生的居住状况对考试的影响很大。该研究比较了全日制学生和寄宿学生在MBBS第一年的学习成绩。这项研究是在印度金奈的savetha医学院进行的。对两组学生的成绩进行了评估。我们进行了两个测试,一个是理论测试,一个是实践测试,其中包括viva voice。所有149名学生都参加了两次考试。两组学生根据得分分为4组。获得<A组占50%,B组占50% ~ 69%,C组占70% ~ 89%,C组占70% ~ 89%。90%为d组。本次研究共有149名学生参与。其中,走读生82人(55.03%),住宿生67人(44.96%)。在理论考试中,59.8%的住宿生属于B组,而宿舍学生的这一比例为55.2%。只有6.09%的走读生属于A组,而旅舍生的这一比例为19.4%。在实践考试中,在日间学生中,52.4%的人属于B组,而在同一组中,宿舍学生的比例为46.2%。只有4.9%的走读生属于A组,而同一组中有19.4%的住宿生属于A组。参与本研究的两组学生在学业上有显著差异。日间学生在学业上的表现优于宿舍学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
525
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信