Variation in Skin Red and Yellow Undertone: Reliability of Ratings and Predicted Relevance for Social Experiences

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Amelia R. Branigan, Johanna G. Nunez, Mariya Adnan Khan, Rachel A. Gordon
{"title":"Variation in Skin Red and Yellow Undertone: Reliability of Ratings and Predicted Relevance for Social Experiences","authors":"Amelia R. Branigan, Johanna G. Nunez, Mariya Adnan Khan, Rachel A. Gordon","doi":"10.1177/01902725231196851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well established that skin lightness-darkness is associated with social outcomes, but little is known regarding the social salience of skin undertones (redness and yellowness). Our study addresses two related research questions on this topic: first, we ask whether red and yellow undertones are consistently perceived by observers; second, we ask whether red and yellow undertones are associated with expectations of discrimination across a range of social settings. We address these questions using novel survey data in which skin lightness-darkness and undertones are captured using CIELAB measurements and a two-dimensional categorical skin color scale. Although we find skin lightness-darkness to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of discrimination expectations, respondents also perceived skin undertones consistently, and skin yellowness was associated with a higher predicted likelihood of discrimination net of lightness-darkness in certain social settings. Our findings suggest that colorism can extend beyond a light-dark binary and emphasize the value of capturing undertones, particularly yellowness, in social surveys assessing skin color.","PeriodicalId":48201,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology Quarterly","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725231196851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that skin lightness-darkness is associated with social outcomes, but little is known regarding the social salience of skin undertones (redness and yellowness). Our study addresses two related research questions on this topic: first, we ask whether red and yellow undertones are consistently perceived by observers; second, we ask whether red and yellow undertones are associated with expectations of discrimination across a range of social settings. We address these questions using novel survey data in which skin lightness-darkness and undertones are captured using CIELAB measurements and a two-dimensional categorical skin color scale. Although we find skin lightness-darkness to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of discrimination expectations, respondents also perceived skin undertones consistently, and skin yellowness was associated with a higher predicted likelihood of discrimination net of lightness-darkness in certain social settings. Our findings suggest that colorism can extend beyond a light-dark binary and emphasize the value of capturing undertones, particularly yellowness, in social surveys assessing skin color.
肤色的红色和黄色底色的变化:评级的可靠性和预测相关性的社会经验
众所周知,皮肤的浅黑度与社会结果有关,但人们对皮肤底色(红色和黄色)的社会显著性知之甚少。我们的研究解决了关于这个主题的两个相关研究问题:首先,我们问观察者是否一致地感知到红色和黄色的底色;其次,我们询问红色和黄色底色是否与一系列社会环境中对歧视的预期有关。我们使用新的调查数据来解决这些问题,其中使用CIELAB测量和二维分类肤色量表捕获皮肤明暗和底色。虽然我们发现肤色浅黑是歧视预期的最强和最一致的预测因素,但受访者也一致地感知到肤色的底色,在某些社会环境中,肤色黄与肤色浅黑的歧视网络的更高预测可能性相关。我们的研究结果表明,在评估肤色的社会调查中,色彩主义可以超越明暗二元,并强调捕捉底色,特别是黄色的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology Quarterly
Social Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: SPPS is a unique short reports journal in social and personality psychology. Its aim is to publish cutting-edge, short reports of single studies, or very succinct reports of multiple studies, and will be geared toward a speedy review and publication process to allow groundbreaking research to be quickly available to the field. Preferences will be given to articles that •have theoretical and practical significance •represent an advance to social psychological or personality science •will be of broad interest both within and outside of social and personality psychology •are written to be intelligible to a wide range of readers including science writers for the popular press
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信