What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education? – A systematic literature review

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Muhammad Zulfadhli Kamarudin, Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor
{"title":"What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education? – A systematic literature review","authors":"Muhammad Zulfadhli Kamarudin, Mohd Syafiq Aiman Mat Noor","doi":"10.1080/09650792.2023.2261502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the development of the notion of the teacher-researcher, a range of published action research studies have focused on school-based pedagogy. Scholars agree that action research is an essential tool for teachers to improve their practice, but there is little known about the process underpinning teachers’ choice of particular action research methodologies in primary science education. In this systematic literature review, 33 articles were reviewed to examine the methodological considerations teacher-researchers made when conducting action research within the primary school context, as well as the quality of the action plans and the impacts of the research on children’s learning in science. The systematic review navigated existing primary science studies, focusing on methodological considerations in the choice of particular types of action research. With regards to the quality of action research studies, the reviewed articles had a good average score for all three types of validity. In terms of the effects of the employed action research methodologies, most studies demonstrated positive impacts on children’s learning in science. Based on this review, it is recommended that future researchers be encouraged to carry out action research in their classroom settings, as most authors in the review favour this approach. Researchers should also examine the outcome, process, and democratic validity of their action research studies to generate better quality action plans. Lastly, primary school science teachers can adopt the various action research methodologies employed in this review since most studies support their positive impacts on children’s learning in science.","PeriodicalId":47325,"journal":{"name":"Educational Action Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2261502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the development of the notion of the teacher-researcher, a range of published action research studies have focused on school-based pedagogy. Scholars agree that action research is an essential tool for teachers to improve their practice, but there is little known about the process underpinning teachers’ choice of particular action research methodologies in primary science education. In this systematic literature review, 33 articles were reviewed to examine the methodological considerations teacher-researchers made when conducting action research within the primary school context, as well as the quality of the action plans and the impacts of the research on children’s learning in science. The systematic review navigated existing primary science studies, focusing on methodological considerations in the choice of particular types of action research. With regards to the quality of action research studies, the reviewed articles had a good average score for all three types of validity. In terms of the effects of the employed action research methodologies, most studies demonstrated positive impacts on children’s learning in science. Based on this review, it is recommended that future researchers be encouraged to carry out action research in their classroom settings, as most authors in the review favour this approach. Researchers should also examine the outcome, process, and democratic validity of their action research studies to generate better quality action plans. Lastly, primary school science teachers can adopt the various action research methodologies employed in this review since most studies support their positive impacts on children’s learning in science.
我们对小学科学教育中行动研究方法的选择了解多少?-系统的文献综述
自教师研究者的概念发展以来,一系列已发表的行动研究都集中在校本教学法上。学者们一致认为,行动研究是教师提高实践水平的重要工具,但对小学科学教育中教师选择特定行动研究方法的过程知之甚少。在这个系统的文献综述中,我们回顾了33篇文章,以检查教师研究人员在小学背景下进行行动研究时所做的方法学考虑,以及行动计划的质量和研究对儿童科学学习的影响。该系统综述对现有的初级科学研究进行了梳理,重点关注在选择特定类型的行动研究时的方法学考虑。关于行动研究的质量,被审查的文章在所有三种效度的平均得分都很好。就所采用的行动研究方法的效果而言,大多数研究显示对儿童的科学学习有积极的影响。基于这篇综述,我们建议鼓励未来的研究者在他们的课堂环境中开展行动研究,因为这篇综述中的大多数作者都赞成这种方法。研究人员还应该检查他们的行动研究的结果、过程和民主有效性,以产生更高质量的行动计划。最后,小学科学教师可以采用本综述中采用的各种行动研究方法,因为大多数研究都支持它们对儿童科学学习的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Action Research
Educational Action Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Educational Action Research is concerned with exploring the dialogue between research and practice in educational settings. The considerable increase in interest in action research in recent years has been accompanied by the development of a number of different approaches: for example, to promote reflective practice; professional development; empowerment; understanding of tacit professional knowledge; curriculum development; individual, institutional and community change; and development of democratic management and administration. Proponents of all these share the common aim of ending the dislocation of research from practice, an aim which links them with those involved in participatory research and action inquiry. This journal publishes accounts of a range of action research and related studies, in education and across the professions, with the aim of making their outcomes widely available and exemplifying the variety of possible styles of reporting. It aims to establish and maintain a review of the literature of action research. It also provides a forum for dialogue on the methodological and epistemological issues, enabling different approaches to be subjected to critical reflection and analysis. The impetus for Educational Action Research came from CARN, the Collaborative Action Research Network, and since its foundation in 1992, EAR has been important in extending and strengthening this international network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信