Prior’s early reflections on sense and sentences

Mike Grimshaw, David Jakobsen
{"title":"Prior’s early reflections on sense and sentences","authors":"Mike Grimshaw, David Jakobsen","doi":"10.54337/lpt.v5i1.7854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present here an introduction and a discussion of A.N. Prior’s ‘Sense and Sentences’ in light of the context of publication in the journal National Education, written upon his return from Europe and while he was undergoing a crisis of faith. We argue that ‘Sense and Sentences’ is the article referred to by Kenny in his Obituary on Prior as an article written “on the relations between logic and grammar (with reference to Popper, Wisdom and Carnap)”. Furthermore, we argue that Prior was working his way into philosophy, by demonstrating his familiarity with the work of key persons within analytic philosophy such as Rudolf Carnap, John Wisdom and Karl Popper. We also argue that Findlay’s – and, thus, indirectly: Wittgenstein’s – influence is also visible in this period where Prior was transitioning from being a religious journalist to the future philosopher he would turn out to become. In particular, we argue that, while Findlay’s influence on the relationship between grammar and metaphysics would win the day with A.N. Prior, when he discovered tense-logic, it was not an evident feature of Prior’s work on the relationship between logic and grammar in sense and sentences. We argue that Sense and Sentences is interesting because it seems to have expressed a stage in Prior’s thinking on logic that he later came to modify, thereby distancing himself more from the anti-metaphysical tenets of analytic philosophy.","PeriodicalId":471511,"journal":{"name":"Logic and Philosophy of Time","volume":"31 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic and Philosophy of Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/lpt.v5i1.7854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present here an introduction and a discussion of A.N. Prior’s ‘Sense and Sentences’ in light of the context of publication in the journal National Education, written upon his return from Europe and while he was undergoing a crisis of faith. We argue that ‘Sense and Sentences’ is the article referred to by Kenny in his Obituary on Prior as an article written “on the relations between logic and grammar (with reference to Popper, Wisdom and Carnap)”. Furthermore, we argue that Prior was working his way into philosophy, by demonstrating his familiarity with the work of key persons within analytic philosophy such as Rudolf Carnap, John Wisdom and Karl Popper. We also argue that Findlay’s – and, thus, indirectly: Wittgenstein’s – influence is also visible in this period where Prior was transitioning from being a religious journalist to the future philosopher he would turn out to become. In particular, we argue that, while Findlay’s influence on the relationship between grammar and metaphysics would win the day with A.N. Prior, when he discovered tense-logic, it was not an evident feature of Prior’s work on the relationship between logic and grammar in sense and sentences. We argue that Sense and Sentences is interesting because it seems to have expressed a stage in Prior’s thinking on logic that he later came to modify, thereby distancing himself more from the anti-metaphysical tenets of analytic philosophy.
普赖尔对感觉和句子的早期思考
我们在此介绍并讨论A.N.普赖尔的《意义与句子》,这篇文章发表在《国民教育》杂志上,写于他从欧洲回来时,当时他正经历着信仰危机。我们认为,《感觉与句子》是肯尼在《论先验的讣告》中提到的一篇“论述逻辑和语法之间的关系(参照波普尔、智慧和卡尔纳普)”的文章。此外,我们认为,普赖尔通过展示他对分析哲学领域关键人物如鲁道夫·卡尔纳普、约翰·威斯登和卡尔·波普尔的作品的熟悉程度,正在努力进入哲学领域。我们还认为,芬德利的影响——因此,间接地:维特根斯坦的影响——在这一时期也很明显,在这一时期,普赖尔从一名宗教记者转变为未来的哲学家,他后来成为了一名哲学家。特别是,我们认为,虽然芬德利对语法与形而上学关系的影响将与A.N.普赖尔一起取得胜利,但当他发现时态逻辑时,这并不是普赖尔在意义和句子中对逻辑与语法关系的研究的一个明显特征。我们认为《感觉与句子》很有趣,因为它似乎表达了普赖尔对逻辑思考的一个阶段,他后来对这个阶段进行了修改,从而使自己与分析哲学的反形而上学原则保持了更大的距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信