The effect of model-based fungicide and ozonated water spraying on Botrytis fruit rot in open-field strawberries

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ulvi Moor, Leila Mainla, Kadri Karp, Mariana Maante-Kuljus, Angela Koort, Tõnu Tõnutare, Priit Põldma
{"title":"The effect of model-based fungicide and ozonated water spraying on Botrytis fruit rot in open-field strawberries","authors":"Ulvi Moor, Leila Mainla, Kadri Karp, Mariana Maante-Kuljus, Angela Koort, Tõnu Tõnutare, Priit Põldma","doi":"10.13080/z-a.2023.110.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to determine whether it is possible to reduce the frequency of spraying fungicides from the usual three times to only one application at more precise time based on the flowering stage or disease prediction model and how effective the spraying with ozonated water is against Botrytis fruit rot (BFR) in open-field strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). The treatments: 1) CTRL – strawberry plants were not sprayed against BFR (control); 2) OW – sprayed with ozonated water twice a week from the beginning of flowering until the end of harvesting; 3) S1F– fungicide 1 (boscalid and pyraclostrobin) application once at 60% flowering (BBCH 65); 4) S1W – fungicide 1 application once based on the predicted BFR risk according to the Bulger model data; and 5) FARM – conventional fungicide spray programme used by strawberry growers: fungicide 2 (cyprodinil, fludioxonil) twice and fungicide 1 once. The number of marketable and BFR-damaged strawberry fruits was determined for each harvest. For analyses, fruits from the 4th harvest were used. In the CTRL treatment, 17% of fruits were infected with BFR. All fungicide treatments significantly reduced infection, and there were no differences between the FARM, S1W, and S1F treatments. The OW applying did not reduce BFR. Fruits sprayed according to S1W and S1F contained residues of boscalid, while fruits sprayed according to FARM contained residues of boscalid, cyprodinil and fludioxonil. All fungicide treatments reduced the total polyphenol content and total antioxidant capacity of fruits, while the FARM and S1W treatments reduced ascorbic acid content. The results of the experiment showed that the frequency of fungicide sprays can be reduced from the usual three times to only one-time application at more precise time without significantly increasing the number of strawberry fruits affected by BFR.","PeriodicalId":23946,"journal":{"name":"Zemdirbyste-agriculture","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zemdirbyste-agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2023.110.031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether it is possible to reduce the frequency of spraying fungicides from the usual three times to only one application at more precise time based on the flowering stage or disease prediction model and how effective the spraying with ozonated water is against Botrytis fruit rot (BFR) in open-field strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). The treatments: 1) CTRL – strawberry plants were not sprayed against BFR (control); 2) OW – sprayed with ozonated water twice a week from the beginning of flowering until the end of harvesting; 3) S1F– fungicide 1 (boscalid and pyraclostrobin) application once at 60% flowering (BBCH 65); 4) S1W – fungicide 1 application once based on the predicted BFR risk according to the Bulger model data; and 5) FARM – conventional fungicide spray programme used by strawberry growers: fungicide 2 (cyprodinil, fludioxonil) twice and fungicide 1 once. The number of marketable and BFR-damaged strawberry fruits was determined for each harvest. For analyses, fruits from the 4th harvest were used. In the CTRL treatment, 17% of fruits were infected with BFR. All fungicide treatments significantly reduced infection, and there were no differences between the FARM, S1W, and S1F treatments. The OW applying did not reduce BFR. Fruits sprayed according to S1W and S1F contained residues of boscalid, while fruits sprayed according to FARM contained residues of boscalid, cyprodinil and fludioxonil. All fungicide treatments reduced the total polyphenol content and total antioxidant capacity of fruits, while the FARM and S1W treatments reduced ascorbic acid content. The results of the experiment showed that the frequency of fungicide sprays can be reduced from the usual three times to only one-time application at more precise time without significantly increasing the number of strawberry fruits affected by BFR.
基于模型的杀菌剂与臭氧水喷施对大田草莓葡萄孢腐病的防治效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zemdirbyste-agriculture
Zemdirbyste-agriculture AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zemdirbyste-Agriculture is a quarterly scientific journal which covers a wide range of topics in the field of agricultural sciences, agronomy. It publishes articles of original research findings in the English language in the field of agronomy (soil and crop management, crop production, plant protection, plant breeding and genetics, biotechnology, plant nutrition, agrochemistry, soil science, microbiology etc.) and related areas. Articles are peer-reviewed. Review, debating papers as well as those of a methodological nature will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信