So-Called Sovereign Settlers: Settler Conspirituality and Nativism in the Australian Anti-Vax Movement

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Madi Day, Bronwyn Carlson
{"title":"So-Called Sovereign Settlers: Settler Conspirituality and Nativism in the Australian Anti-Vax Movement","authors":"Madi Day, Bronwyn Carlson","doi":"10.3390/h12050112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic, and the social and economic instability that followed, has given new life to conspirituality and far-right ideology in so-called Australia. This article discusses how politico-spiritual communities invested in both conspiracy theories and New Age spirituality have pieced together settler narratives about a New World Order and external threats to Western society from far-right and white supremacist Christian ideology circulated via new media. Using anti-colonial discourse analysis, we elucidate the undercurrent of white supremacist ideology in the Australian anti-vax movement, and highlight the misuse of Indigeneity in far-right and anti-vax narratives. We discuss how these narratives are settler-colonial and how conspiritualists co-opt and perform Indigeneity as a form of settler nativism. As a case study, we analyse the use of the term sovereignty by settlers attached to Muckadda Camp—a camp of ‘Original Sovereigns’ occupying the lawn outside Old Parliament house from December 2021 to February 2022. Using Indigenous critique from both new media and academia, we argue that although settlers may perform Indigeneity, they are exercising white supremacist settler narratives, and not Indigenous sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":93761,"journal":{"name":"Humanities (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/h12050112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, and the social and economic instability that followed, has given new life to conspirituality and far-right ideology in so-called Australia. This article discusses how politico-spiritual communities invested in both conspiracy theories and New Age spirituality have pieced together settler narratives about a New World Order and external threats to Western society from far-right and white supremacist Christian ideology circulated via new media. Using anti-colonial discourse analysis, we elucidate the undercurrent of white supremacist ideology in the Australian anti-vax movement, and highlight the misuse of Indigeneity in far-right and anti-vax narratives. We discuss how these narratives are settler-colonial and how conspiritualists co-opt and perform Indigeneity as a form of settler nativism. As a case study, we analyse the use of the term sovereignty by settlers attached to Muckadda Camp—a camp of ‘Original Sovereigns’ occupying the lawn outside Old Parliament house from December 2021 to February 2022. Using Indigenous critique from both new media and academia, we argue that although settlers may perform Indigeneity, they are exercising white supremacist settler narratives, and not Indigenous sovereignty.
所谓的主权定居者:澳大利亚反疫苗运动中的定居者阴谋论和本土主义
新冠肺炎疫情以及随之而来的社会和经济不稳定,给所谓的澳大利亚的阴谋论和极右翼意识形态注入了新的活力。这篇文章讨论了政治-精神团体如何投资于阴谋论和新纪元精神,将定居者关于新世界秩序的叙述和通过新媒体传播的极右翼和白人至上主义基督教意识形态对西方社会的外部威胁拼凑在一起。通过反殖民话语分析,我们阐明了澳大利亚反疫苗运动中白人至上主义意识形态的暗流,并强调了在极右翼和反疫苗叙事中对土著的滥用。我们将讨论这些叙事是如何成为定居者-殖民地的,以及阴谋论者如何将土著作为定居者本土主义的一种形式加以利用和表现。作为一个案例研究,我们分析了附属于Muckadda营地的定居者对“主权”一词的使用。Muckadda营地是2021年12月至2022年2月占据旧国会大厦外草坪的“原始主权”营地。利用新媒体和学术界对土著的批评,我们认为,尽管定居者可能表现出土著性,但他们是在行使白人至上主义定居者叙事,而不是土著主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信