Higher metabolic plasticity in temperate compared to tropical lizards suggests increased resilience to climate change: Comment

IF 7.1 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Ecological Monographs Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1002/ecm.1595

Keith Christian, Gavin Bedford, Chava L. Weitzman

引用次数: 0

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

温带蜥蜴的新陈代谢可塑性高于热带蜥蜴，这表明它们对气候变化的适应能力更强：评论

与热带蜥蜴相比，温带蜥蜴更高的代谢可塑性表明它们对气候变化的适应能力更强:评论Keith Christian，通讯作者Keith Christian [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-1670澳大利亚北领地达尔文查尔斯达尔文大学环境与生计研究所Keith Christian， [email protected]搜索本作者的更多论文搜索本作者的更多论文搜索本作者的更多论文查瓦·l·韦茨曼，查瓦·l·韦茨曼环境与生计研究所，查尔斯·达尔文大学，达尔文，北领地，澳大利亚搜索本作者的更多论文通讯作者Keith Christian [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-1670澳大利亚北领地达尔文市查尔斯·达尔文大学环境与生计研究所Keith Christian， [email protected]搜索本作者的更多论文搜索本作者的更多论文搜索本作者的更多论文查瓦·l·韦茨曼，查瓦·l·韦茨曼环境与生计研究所，查尔斯·达尔文大学，达尔文，北领地，澳大利亚搜索本作者的更多论文搜索本作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年10月23日https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1595本文已被接受发表，并经过了充分的同行评审，但尚未经过编辑、排版、页数和校对过程，这可能导致本版本与记录版本存在差异。请引用这篇文章的doi: 10.1002/ecm.1595。AboutPDF ToolsExport引文添加到收藏夹strack引文ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并勾选下面的复选框共享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享一个emailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信接受文章接受的，未经编辑的文章发表在网上，可引用。记录的最终编辑和排版版本将在将来出现。e1595 RelatedInformation

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

12.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.