Reliability of the multipeg™ transducer in meas-uring dental implant stability by using a reso-nance frequency analysis device (Osstell®): An observational clinical study

Alamin Y Dhahi, Salwan Y Bede, Haig Khachadourian
{"title":"Reliability of the multipeg™ transducer in meas-uring dental implant stability by using a reso-nance frequency analysis device (Osstell®): An observational clinical study","authors":"Alamin Y Dhahi, Salwan Y Bede, Haig Khachadourian","doi":"10.26477/jbcd.v35i3.3455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measuring implant stability is an important issue in predicting treatment success. Dental implant stability is usually measured through resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Osstell® RFA devices can be used with transducers (Smartpeg™) that correspond to the implants used as well as with transducers designed for application with Penguin® RFA devices (Multipeg™). Aims: This study aims to assess the reliability of a MultiPeg™ transducer with an Osstell® device in measuring dental implant stability. Materials and Methods: Sixteen healthy participants who required dental implant treatment were enrolled in this study. Implant stability was measured by using an Osstell® device with two transducers, namely, Smartpeg™ and Multipeg™. Insertion torque was also measured and recorded as >50 and ≤50 N·cm. Unpaired t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were conducted to assess the relationships of the implant stability values obtained by the two transducers with insertion torque, whereas Pearson and Spearman's correlations were utilized to investigate correlations between the two transducers. Interclass correlation coefficients were applied to assess the reliability between the two transducers. Results: Implant stability measurements (primary and secondary) showed strong positive correlations between Smartpeg™ and Multipeg™. The reliability values between both transducers in primary and secondary implant stability measurements were 0.922 and 0.981, respectively. The use of both transducers revealed higher implant stability measurements for implants inserted with insertion torque > 50 N·cm than those inserted with insertion torque ≤ 50 N·cm. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the Multipeg™ transducer is reliable in measuring the stability of dental implants using an Osstell® device.","PeriodicalId":15041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of baghdad college of dentistry","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of baghdad college of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/jbcd.v35i3.3455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measuring implant stability is an important issue in predicting treatment success. Dental implant stability is usually measured through resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Osstell® RFA devices can be used with transducers (Smartpeg™) that correspond to the implants used as well as with transducers designed for application with Penguin® RFA devices (Multipeg™). Aims: This study aims to assess the reliability of a MultiPeg™ transducer with an Osstell® device in measuring dental implant stability. Materials and Methods: Sixteen healthy participants who required dental implant treatment were enrolled in this study. Implant stability was measured by using an Osstell® device with two transducers, namely, Smartpeg™ and Multipeg™. Insertion torque was also measured and recorded as >50 and ≤50 N·cm. Unpaired t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were conducted to assess the relationships of the implant stability values obtained by the two transducers with insertion torque, whereas Pearson and Spearman's correlations were utilized to investigate correlations between the two transducers. Interclass correlation coefficients were applied to assess the reliability between the two transducers. Results: Implant stability measurements (primary and secondary) showed strong positive correlations between Smartpeg™ and Multipeg™. The reliability values between both transducers in primary and secondary implant stability measurements were 0.922 and 0.981, respectively. The use of both transducers revealed higher implant stability measurements for implants inserted with insertion torque > 50 N·cm than those inserted with insertion torque ≤ 50 N·cm. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the Multipeg™ transducer is reliable in measuring the stability of dental implants using an Osstell® device.
使用共振频率分析装置(Osstell®)测量牙种植体稳定性的multipeg™传感器的可靠性:一项观察性临床研究
背景:测量种植体的稳定性是预测治疗成功的重要因素。牙种植体的稳定性通常通过共振频率分析(RFA)来测量。Osstell®RFA设备可与与所使用植入物相对应的传感器(Smartpeg™)以及为企鹅®RFA设备(Multipeg™)设计的传感器一起使用。目的:本研究旨在评估MultiPeg™换能器与Osstell®装置在测量牙种植体稳定性方面的可靠性。材料和方法:16名需要种植牙治疗的健康受试者被纳入本研究。使用带有两个传感器的Osstell®设备(Smartpeg™和Multipeg™)测量植入物的稳定性。同时测量插入扭矩,记录为>50和≤50 N·cm。采用非配对t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验来评估两种换能器获得的植入物稳定性值与插入扭矩的关系,而使用Pearson和Spearman相关来研究两种换能器之间的相关性。使用类间相关系数来评估两个传感器之间的可靠性。结果:种植体稳定性测量(初级和次级)显示Smartpeg™和Multipeg™之间有很强的正相关。两种传感器在一次和二次种植体稳定性测量中的可靠性值分别为0.922和0.981。两种换能器的使用表明,对于插入扭矩>的植入物,植入物的稳定性测量更高;插入力矩≤50 N·cm时,插入力矩大于50 N·cm。结论:本研究证明Multipeg™传感器在使用Osstell®设备测量牙种植体稳定性方面是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书