Biomechanical Test Setup for the Investigation of Forehead Suture Techniques

Q4 Engineering
Carina M. Micheler, Jan J. Lang, Nikolas J. Wilhelm, Victor G. Schaack, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rainer H. H. Burgkart, Anja Bäumlisberger, Nikolaus Wachtel
{"title":"Biomechanical Test Setup for the Investigation of Forehead Suture Techniques","authors":"Carina M. Micheler, Jan J. Lang, Nikolas J. Wilhelm, Victor G. Schaack, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rainer H. H. Burgkart, Anja Bäumlisberger, Nikolaus Wachtel","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Wound healing can be delayed if the biomechanical stability of the wound closure is inadequate. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate different suturing techniques for their biomechanical stability. In this study, suturing techniques suitable for the forehead area were investigated. For this application, a special test setup was developed to simulate the curvature of the forehead and the corresponding physiological configuration. The average forehead curvature is 62.24 ± 4.11 mm in radius. To simulate this curvature, the skin specimens are subjected to tensile stress over the spherical surface using a standard uniaxial testing machine. For the evaluation, an automated evaluation tool for MATLAB was also developed. Three different suturing techniques (Straight, Lazy-S, Zigzag) were investigated and tested for their biomechanical stability. Of the three suturing techniques, the Zigzag suture proved to be the most stable with the highest stiffness of 44.23 ± 8.18 % and the highest final failure of 32.60 ± 4.95 % (relative to the control sample without incision). The study has shown that the test setup can be used to investigate different forehead suture techniques.","PeriodicalId":10739,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Wound healing can be delayed if the biomechanical stability of the wound closure is inadequate. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate different suturing techniques for their biomechanical stability. In this study, suturing techniques suitable for the forehead area were investigated. For this application, a special test setup was developed to simulate the curvature of the forehead and the corresponding physiological configuration. The average forehead curvature is 62.24 ± 4.11 mm in radius. To simulate this curvature, the skin specimens are subjected to tensile stress over the spherical surface using a standard uniaxial testing machine. For the evaluation, an automated evaluation tool for MATLAB was also developed. Three different suturing techniques (Straight, Lazy-S, Zigzag) were investigated and tested for their biomechanical stability. Of the three suturing techniques, the Zigzag suture proved to be the most stable with the highest stiffness of 44.23 ± 8.18 % and the highest final failure of 32.60 ± 4.95 % (relative to the control sample without incision). The study has shown that the test setup can be used to investigate different forehead suture techniques.
研究前额缝合技术的生物力学试验装置
如果创面闭合的生物力学稳定性不充分,创面愈合可能会延迟。因此,有必要研究不同的缝合技术对其生物力学稳定性的影响。本研究探讨适用于额头部位的缝合技术。为此,开发了一种特殊的测试装置来模拟前额的曲率和相应的生理结构。平均前额曲率半径为62.24±4.11 mm。为了模拟这种曲率,使用标准的单轴试验机使皮肤样品在球面上受到拉伸应力。为了进行评价,还开发了MATLAB自动化评价工具。研究了三种不同的缝合技术(直缝、Lazy-S缝和zigzz缝),并测试了它们的生物力学稳定性。三种缝合方式中,锯齿形缝合最稳定,刚度最高,为44.23±8.18%,最终失败率最高,为32.60±4.95%(相对于未切口的对照)。研究表明,该测试装置可用于研究不同的前额缝合技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
239
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信