The Quota System as a mechanism of positive discrimination in the implementation of the principle of equality

{"title":"The Quota System as a mechanism of positive discrimination in the implementation of the principle of equality","authors":"","doi":"10.58869/ejabm9(3)/02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : Leading the idea of human dignity, equality describes an artificial construction whose implementation transcends its identical application on citizens as far as their particularities give rise to inequalities in this treatment. The recognition of the need to proportionally share benefits in this implementation builds policies of «affirmative actions» aimed at suppressing the imbalance of opportunities suffered by excluded group in a more accelerated manner. The greater dimension of their segregation encouraged the states to embark on quota systems by legalizing minimum percentages of occupancy of services by these groups, guaranteeing their active participation in society. This article seeks to understand which characteristics inherent to excluded groups encourage the implementation of quota systems, as well as the area of society in which they affect. Methodology: We used a quantitative methodology based on meta-analysis, which combines qualitative research carried out on a given topic in order to analyse, systematise and compare knowledge, results and conclusions (Bicudo, 2014) with greater precision (Costa, 2022). The meta-analysis carried out on the subject of the quota system as an instrument of positive discrimination began by inserting the expression 'quota systems' into the Google Scholar search engine, duly accompanied by the code 'allintitle' for the purposes of containing results, and the English language was selected for its invocation in an attempt to achieve greater international diversity. Results : It was found that, although they tend to address socio-economic issues to circumvent any ethical issues that may arise from their implementation, quota systems tend to dedicate their quotas to gender issues in politics, to the disabled population in the labour context and to different ethnic backgrounds in universities. Originality : This article contributes to the theoretical understanding of this subject by organising conceptual, philosophical and historical knowledge in the construction of the path behind the motivations inherent in the implementation of a quota system. The practical contribution lies in the presentation of a global panorama of its group and societal impact, in order to better understand these motivations. Keywords: equality; excluded groups; meta-analysis; positive discrimination; quota systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58869/EJABM9(3)/02","PeriodicalId":475067,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Business and Management","volume":"506 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58869/ejabm9(3)/02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : Leading the idea of human dignity, equality describes an artificial construction whose implementation transcends its identical application on citizens as far as their particularities give rise to inequalities in this treatment. The recognition of the need to proportionally share benefits in this implementation builds policies of «affirmative actions» aimed at suppressing the imbalance of opportunities suffered by excluded group in a more accelerated manner. The greater dimension of their segregation encouraged the states to embark on quota systems by legalizing minimum percentages of occupancy of services by these groups, guaranteeing their active participation in society. This article seeks to understand which characteristics inherent to excluded groups encourage the implementation of quota systems, as well as the area of society in which they affect. Methodology: We used a quantitative methodology based on meta-analysis, which combines qualitative research carried out on a given topic in order to analyse, systematise and compare knowledge, results and conclusions (Bicudo, 2014) with greater precision (Costa, 2022). The meta-analysis carried out on the subject of the quota system as an instrument of positive discrimination began by inserting the expression 'quota systems' into the Google Scholar search engine, duly accompanied by the code 'allintitle' for the purposes of containing results, and the English language was selected for its invocation in an attempt to achieve greater international diversity. Results : It was found that, although they tend to address socio-economic issues to circumvent any ethical issues that may arise from their implementation, quota systems tend to dedicate their quotas to gender issues in politics, to the disabled population in the labour context and to different ethnic backgrounds in universities. Originality : This article contributes to the theoretical understanding of this subject by organising conceptual, philosophical and historical knowledge in the construction of the path behind the motivations inherent in the implementation of a quota system. The practical contribution lies in the presentation of a global panorama of its group and societal impact, in order to better understand these motivations. Keywords: equality; excluded groups; meta-analysis; positive discrimination; quota systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58869/EJABM9(3)/02
配额制度作为一种积极的歧视机制,在平等原则的实施中发挥着重要作用
目的:引导人类尊严的思想,平等描述了一种人为的结构,其实施超越了对公民的相同适用,因为公民的特殊性导致了这种待遇的不平等。认识到在实施过程中按比例分享利益的必要性,就形成了旨在以更快的方式压制被排斥群体所遭受的机会不平衡的“平权行动”政策。他们更大程度的隔离促使各州实行配额制度,使这些群体享有服务的最低比例合法化,保证他们积极参与社会。本文试图了解被排斥群体的哪些固有特征鼓励实行配额制度,以及配额制度所影响的社会领域。方法:我们使用了一种基于元分析的定量方法,它结合了对给定主题进行的定性研究,以便以更高的精度分析,系统化和比较知识,结果和结论(Bicudo, 2014) (Costa, 2022)。对作为积极歧视工具的配额制度主题进行的荟萃分析首先将“配额制度”一词插入谷歌学术搜索引擎,并适当地伴随着代码“allintitle”以包含结果,并选择英语作为其调用,以试图实现更大的国际多样性。结果:研究发现,尽管配额制度倾向于解决社会经济问题,以规避实施过程中可能出现的任何伦理问题,但配额制度倾向于将其配额用于政治中的性别问题、劳动环境中的残疾人口和大学中的不同种族背景。原创性:本文通过组织概念、哲学和历史知识来构建配额制度实施内在动机背后的路径,有助于对这一主题的理论理解。其实际贡献在于呈现其群体和社会影响的全球全景,以便更好地理解这些动机。关键词:平等;排除组织;荟萃分析;积极歧视;配额系统。DOI: https://doi.org/10.58869/EJABM9 (3) / 02
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书