Gora DA ROCHA RODRIGUES, Catherine BOLLONDI PAULY, Monique BOEGLI, François CURTIN, Adrien ANEX, Sezen CEKIC, Christophe LUTHY, Jules DESMEULES, Christine CEDRASCHI
{"title":"Impacts of Touch massage on the experience of patients with chronic pain: a non-randomized cluster clinical trial","authors":"Gora DA ROCHA RODRIGUES, Catherine BOLLONDI PAULY, Monique BOEGLI, François CURTIN, Adrien ANEX, Sezen CEKIC, Christophe LUTHY, Jules DESMEULES, Christine CEDRASCHI","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic pain is a major public health problem. Non-pharmacological interventions are increasingly being used as a complement to chronic pain treatment and are strongly recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Touch massage (TM) on the experience of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in a rehabilitation ward. A non-randomized cluster clinical trial was conducted. Eighty-two participants were included in this study, 39 in the intervention group and 43 in the control group. Participants in both groups received 4 sessions of massage (TM or via a machine) over the course of 2 weeks. For both groups, Patients’ Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in the perception of pain and secondary outcomes (pain intensity, anxiety/depression, patient- provider relationship) were measured at baseline and after the intervention. There was a small effect (Cohen’s d = 0.42) of the intervention type on the score of the PGIC. Patients who received TM tended to perceive more change than participants who received machine massage. The type of intervention had no effect on the other key variables (pain intensity, anxiety/depression, or patient- provider relationship). This study shows with a rigorous and pragmatic methodology that TM has a positive impact on the perception of pain relief in patients suffering from chronic pain. TM appears as a useful and well manageable therapy for these difficult to treat patients and somewhat better than machine delivered foot massage.","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2023.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chronic pain is a major public health problem. Non-pharmacological interventions are increasingly being used as a complement to chronic pain treatment and are strongly recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Touch massage (TM) on the experience of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in a rehabilitation ward. A non-randomized cluster clinical trial was conducted. Eighty-two participants were included in this study, 39 in the intervention group and 43 in the control group. Participants in both groups received 4 sessions of massage (TM or via a machine) over the course of 2 weeks. For both groups, Patients’ Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in the perception of pain and secondary outcomes (pain intensity, anxiety/depression, patient- provider relationship) were measured at baseline and after the intervention. There was a small effect (Cohen’s d = 0.42) of the intervention type on the score of the PGIC. Patients who received TM tended to perceive more change than participants who received machine massage. The type of intervention had no effect on the other key variables (pain intensity, anxiety/depression, or patient- provider relationship). This study shows with a rigorous and pragmatic methodology that TM has a positive impact on the perception of pain relief in patients suffering from chronic pain. TM appears as a useful and well manageable therapy for these difficult to treat patients and somewhat better than machine delivered foot massage.
慢性疼痛是一个主要的公共卫生问题。非药物干预越来越多地被用作慢性疼痛治疗的补充,并被强烈推荐。本研究的目的是评估触摸按摩(TM)对康复病房慢性疼痛住院患者体验的影响。进行了一项非随机群集临床试验。本研究共纳入82名受试者,其中干预组39人,对照组43人。两组的参与者在两周的时间里都接受了4次按摩(TM或通过机器)。对于两组,在基线和干预后测量了患者在疼痛感知和次要结局(疼痛强度,焦虑/抑郁,医患关系)方面的总体变化印象(PGIC)。干预类型对PGIC评分的影响较小(Cohen’s d = 0.42)。接受TM的患者比接受机器按摩的患者更容易感觉到变化。干预类型对其他关键变量(疼痛强度、焦虑/抑郁或医患关系)没有影响。本研究以严谨务实的方法显示,TM对慢性疼痛患者的疼痛缓解感有积极的影响。对于这些难以治疗的患者,TM似乎是一种有用且易于管理的治疗方法,并且比机器提供的足部按摩更好。
期刊介绍:
Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.