The social behavior of traveling with dogs: Drivers, behavioral tendencies, and experiences

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Lori S. Hoy, Brigitte Stangl, Nigel Morgan
{"title":"The social behavior of traveling with dogs: Drivers, behavioral tendencies, and experiences","authors":"Lori S. Hoy, Brigitte Stangl, Nigel Morgan","doi":"10.1177/13567667231202798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increases in dog guardianship and the demand for dog-friendly travel services present an opportunity for tourism providers, but this market can still be undervalued or taken for granted. A better understanding of the social behavior and experiences of traveling with dogs is required to discern what impacts guardians’ behavioral tendencies to travel with their dogs. Built on past literature and the reflective-impulsive model (RIM) of social behavior, a conceptual model was developed based on four social representations/perceptions (human–dog symbiotic relationship, dog well-being beliefs, information acquisition, and perceived risks) that influence guardians’ motivational orientation (intrinsic motivation) and behavioral tendencies (intention and behavioral schema) to travel with their dogs. A mixed methods design, with an online survey ( N = 611) to test the model using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and semi-structured interviews ( N = 34), was used to develop a better understanding of the social representations and experiences of guardians traveling with their dogs. Results from the quantitative analysis show that dog well-being beliefs had the strongest positive impact, while both dog well-being beliefs and information acquisition impacted motivation and behavioral tendencies. Perceived risks had a negative effect only on behavioral schema, while the human–dog symbiotic relationship required intrinsic motivation to drive behavioral patterns. Qualitative findings highlight the lived experiences of those traveling with their dogs, emphasizing that human and dog well-being and enjoyment are important to guardians, while issues persist with guardians finding adequate dog-friendly travel information and concerns regarding risks remain. Theoretical and managerial implications are provided.","PeriodicalId":47859,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vacation Marketing","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vacation Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667231202798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increases in dog guardianship and the demand for dog-friendly travel services present an opportunity for tourism providers, but this market can still be undervalued or taken for granted. A better understanding of the social behavior and experiences of traveling with dogs is required to discern what impacts guardians’ behavioral tendencies to travel with their dogs. Built on past literature and the reflective-impulsive model (RIM) of social behavior, a conceptual model was developed based on four social representations/perceptions (human–dog symbiotic relationship, dog well-being beliefs, information acquisition, and perceived risks) that influence guardians’ motivational orientation (intrinsic motivation) and behavioral tendencies (intention and behavioral schema) to travel with their dogs. A mixed methods design, with an online survey ( N = 611) to test the model using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and semi-structured interviews ( N = 34), was used to develop a better understanding of the social representations and experiences of guardians traveling with their dogs. Results from the quantitative analysis show that dog well-being beliefs had the strongest positive impact, while both dog well-being beliefs and information acquisition impacted motivation and behavioral tendencies. Perceived risks had a negative effect only on behavioral schema, while the human–dog symbiotic relationship required intrinsic motivation to drive behavioral patterns. Qualitative findings highlight the lived experiences of those traveling with their dogs, emphasizing that human and dog well-being and enjoyment are important to guardians, while issues persist with guardians finding adequate dog-friendly travel information and concerns regarding risks remain. Theoretical and managerial implications are provided.
与狗一起旅行的社会行为:司机、行为倾向和经验
狗狗监护的增加和对狗友好旅游服务的需求为旅游供应商提供了一个机会,但这个市场仍然可能被低估或被视为理所当然。需要更好地了解与狗一起旅行的社会行为和经验,以识别影响监护人与狗一起旅行的行为倾向的因素。基于以往文献和社会行为的反思-冲动模型(RIM),本文建立了一个基于四种社会表征/知觉(人犬共生关系、狗狗幸福信念、信息获取和感知风险)影响监护人带狗旅行动机取向(内在动机)和行为倾向(意图和行为图式)的概念模型。采用混合方法设计,使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)和半结构化访谈(N = 34)进行在线调查(N = 611)来检验模型,以更好地了解监护人带狗旅行的社会表征和体验。定量分析结果表明,狗的幸福信念对动机和行为倾向的正向影响最大,而狗的幸福信念和信息获取对动机和行为倾向的正向影响都最大。感知风险仅对行为模式有负面影响,而人狗共生关系需要内在动机来驱动行为模式。定性研究结果强调了那些带狗旅行的人的生活经历,强调人类和狗的幸福和享受对监护人来说很重要,而监护人寻找足够的狗友好的旅行信息和对风险的担忧仍然存在。提供了理论和管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Journal of Vacation Marketing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on topics relating to the marketing of destinations and businesses/organisations involved in the wider tourism, hospitality and events industries. Its objective is to provide a forum for the publication of refereed academic papers and reviewed practitioner papers which are of direct relevance to industry, while meeting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信