{"title":"Encouraging student engagement, interaction, and learning via online discussion boards: Reflections on using Yellowdig in the COVID-19 era","authors":"Eva A. Alfoldi","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2023.2263614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn the COVID-19 era, Yellowdig (an online discussion board with social media-like features) has increasingly risen to prominence in higher education. Reflecting on a multi-year experiment involving 14 international business and marketing courses, I argue that Yellowdig remains a valuable tool for learning even after returning to face-to-face classes. Nonetheless, my experience also highlights its limitations. While Yellowdig is not a panacea for social learning, it can provide a versatile platform for student interaction and engagement, provided that instructors maintain a clear purpose and realistic expectations. I present key considerations to help instructors optimize their use of Yellowdig.Keywords: Discussion boardslearningsocial interactionstudent engagementYellowdig AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Gary Barnes and Daniel Sullivan for their insights, suggestions, and professional opinions.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recently, Shea and Bidjerano (Citation2010) proposed the addition of a fourth construct to the model: learner presence, referring to self-efficacy and individual effort. For a more detailed literature review of the community of inquiry model, see Rourke and Kanuka (Citation2009).2 The company recommends a conversation ratio (total number of comments divided by total number of posts) of 8 or more. While the pedagogical value of focusing heavily on encouraging comments/reactions rather than original content is up for debate, Yellowdig’s developers contend that “the intended purpose of the gamification point system in Yellowdig is to alter behavior, not assess it, and to get students interacting with their peers” (Savvides et al., Citation2019).3 Three outliers from Fall 2020 were excluded from the calculation: 542.3 and 154.6% (minimum word counts were accidentally left on Yellowdig’s default settings) and −37.8% (due to teething problems, several students were granted a make-up assignment late in the course, which allowed them to post short comments).","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2263614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractIn the COVID-19 era, Yellowdig (an online discussion board with social media-like features) has increasingly risen to prominence in higher education. Reflecting on a multi-year experiment involving 14 international business and marketing courses, I argue that Yellowdig remains a valuable tool for learning even after returning to face-to-face classes. Nonetheless, my experience also highlights its limitations. While Yellowdig is not a panacea for social learning, it can provide a versatile platform for student interaction and engagement, provided that instructors maintain a clear purpose and realistic expectations. I present key considerations to help instructors optimize their use of Yellowdig.Keywords: Discussion boardslearningsocial interactionstudent engagementYellowdig AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank Gary Barnes and Daniel Sullivan for their insights, suggestions, and professional opinions.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 More recently, Shea and Bidjerano (Citation2010) proposed the addition of a fourth construct to the model: learner presence, referring to self-efficacy and individual effort. For a more detailed literature review of the community of inquiry model, see Rourke and Kanuka (Citation2009).2 The company recommends a conversation ratio (total number of comments divided by total number of posts) of 8 or more. While the pedagogical value of focusing heavily on encouraging comments/reactions rather than original content is up for debate, Yellowdig’s developers contend that “the intended purpose of the gamification point system in Yellowdig is to alter behavior, not assess it, and to get students interacting with their peers” (Savvides et al., Citation2019).3 Three outliers from Fall 2020 were excluded from the calculation: 542.3 and 154.6% (minimum word counts were accidentally left on Yellowdig’s default settings) and −37.8% (due to teething problems, several students were granted a make-up assignment late in the course, which allowed them to post short comments).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.