Telaah Atas Ijtihad Umar Bin Khaṭṭab Perspektif Maqāṣid Al-Syarī'ah

Amir Sahidin
{"title":"Telaah Atas Ijtihad Umar Bin Khaṭṭab Perspektif Maqāṣid Al-Syarī'ah","authors":"Amir Sahidin","doi":"10.58836/jpma.v14i1.16553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the course of Islamic law, there were several issues of muamalat that were not found in law at the time of the Prophet, so the companions made ijtihad to find them. In fact, not infrequently the laws set by the companions seemed to contradict the teachings of the Prophet. As ijtihad was carried out by Umar bin Khaṭṭab in several ways such as: aborting the had punishment for adulterers, aborting the punishment for cutting off the hands of thieves, stopping giving zakat to <em>mu'allaf</em>, not dividing spoils of war between Muslim soldiers. Regarding some of these ijtihad, many people praised Umar's intelligence in grounding Islamic law. However, there are also some scholars who make Umar the pioneer of sharia deconstruction. This article attempts to examine Umar's ijtihad with the <em>maqāṣid al-syarī'ah</em> approach. Through research of the type of library research with a descriptive-analytic approach, it can be concluded that, <em>first:</em> Umar's ijtihad in some of the above cases did not actually deconstruct Islamic law, but because of his intelligence and foresight in seeing the factors that could hinder the implementation of these lawsuits. <em>Second: </em>Umar bin Khaṭṭab saw the <em>naṣ</em> textually and contextually in a balanced way, without annulling the existing <em>naṣ</em>.</p>","PeriodicalId":500668,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58836/jpma.v14i1.16553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the course of Islamic law, there were several issues of muamalat that were not found in law at the time of the Prophet, so the companions made ijtihad to find them. In fact, not infrequently the laws set by the companions seemed to contradict the teachings of the Prophet. As ijtihad was carried out by Umar bin Khaṭṭab in several ways such as: aborting the had punishment for adulterers, aborting the punishment for cutting off the hands of thieves, stopping giving zakat to mu'allaf, not dividing spoils of war between Muslim soldiers. Regarding some of these ijtihad, many people praised Umar's intelligence in grounding Islamic law. However, there are also some scholars who make Umar the pioneer of sharia deconstruction. This article attempts to examine Umar's ijtihad with the maqāṣid al-syarī'ah approach. Through research of the type of library research with a descriptive-analytic approach, it can be concluded that, first: Umar's ijtihad in some of the above cases did not actually deconstruct Islamic law, but because of his intelligence and foresight in seeing the factors that could hinder the implementation of these lawsuits. Second: Umar bin Khaṭṭab saw the naṣ textually and contextually in a balanced way, without annulling the existing naṣ.

从《沙里亚圣训集》的角度审视欧麦尔-本-哈特塔布的伊斯兰教义
在伊斯兰教法的发展过程中,有几个关于穆阿马拉的问题在先知时代的法律中没有被发现,所以同伴们做出了努力去找到它们。事实上,同伴们制定的法律似乎经常与先知的教导相矛盾。由于伊智提哈德是由欧麦尔·本·Khaṭṭab以几种方式执行的,例如:取消对通奸者的惩罚,取消对砍贼手的惩罚,停止向穆斯林士兵分发天课,不在穆斯林士兵之间分配战利品。对于其中一些圣战分子,许多人称赞奥马尔在建立伊斯兰法律方面的智慧。然而,也有一些学者认为欧麦尔是伊斯兰教法解构的先驱。本文试图用<em>maqāṣid al-syar ' 'ah</em>的方法。通过用描述分析法对图书馆研究类型的研究,可以得出以下结论:< em>第一:</em>欧麦尔在上述一些案件中的伊吉蒂哈德实际上并没有解构伊斯兰法律,而是因为他的智慧和远见,看到了可能阻碍这些诉讼实施的因素。<em>第二:</em>Umar bin Khaṭṭab看到了<em>naṣ</em>在文本和上下文中以平衡的方式,而不取消现有的<em>naṣ</em>.</p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信