Comparing student perceptions of in-class, online synchronous, and online asynchronous instruction

Q2 Social Sciences
Shailendra Palvia, Vic Matta
{"title":"Comparing student perceptions of in-class, online synchronous, and online asynchronous instruction","authors":"Shailendra Palvia, Vic Matta","doi":"10.18844/wjet.v15i3.8656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the efficacy of undergraduate teaching for in-class, online synchronous, and online asynchronous modes of instruction with implications for adapting the modes of instruction in computer information processing. The study uses a repeated measures design with pairwise comparisons while controlling for instructor, students, and course content across these modes of instruction. The study examines the following six perceptions held by students: instructional aspects such as instructor facilitation, student-to-student interaction, instructor-to-student interaction, course design, learning outcomes, and student satisfaction. The study also examines actual student performance on homework, quizzes, and exams. All findings were interesting and insightful. Student perceptions of almost all instructional aspects were significantly higher for the in-class mode than the two online modes of instruction. However, actual student performance was significantly better for online modes of instruction. The discussion section triangulates these statistical results with a review of 3000+ open-ended student responses to explain results, provide guidelines, and suggest future research. Keywords: Asynchronous instruction; distance education; E-learning; in-class; online; synchronous instruction","PeriodicalId":36811,"journal":{"name":"World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v15i3.8656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article compares the efficacy of undergraduate teaching for in-class, online synchronous, and online asynchronous modes of instruction with implications for adapting the modes of instruction in computer information processing. The study uses a repeated measures design with pairwise comparisons while controlling for instructor, students, and course content across these modes of instruction. The study examines the following six perceptions held by students: instructional aspects such as instructor facilitation, student-to-student interaction, instructor-to-student interaction, course design, learning outcomes, and student satisfaction. The study also examines actual student performance on homework, quizzes, and exams. All findings were interesting and insightful. Student perceptions of almost all instructional aspects were significantly higher for the in-class mode than the two online modes of instruction. However, actual student performance was significantly better for online modes of instruction. The discussion section triangulates these statistical results with a review of 3000+ open-ended student responses to explain results, provide guidelines, and suggest future research. Keywords: Asynchronous instruction; distance education; E-learning; in-class; online; synchronous instruction
比较学生对课堂教学、在线同步教学和在线异步教学的看法
本文比较了本科课堂教学、在线同步教学和在线异步教学模式的教学效果,以及在计算机信息处理中适应教学模式的启示。该研究采用重复测量设计,两两比较,同时控制教师,学生和课程内容在这些教学模式。该研究考察了学生持有的以下六种看法:教学方面,如教师促进、学生与学生互动、教师与学生互动、课程设计、学习成果和学生满意度。该研究还考察了学生在家庭作业、测验和考试中的实际表现。所有的发现都很有趣,也很有见地。学生对几乎所有教学方面的看法,课堂教学模式明显高于两种在线教学模式。然而,在线教学模式的学生实际表现明显更好。讨论部分将这些统计结果与3000多个开放式学生回答进行三角分析,以解释结果,提供指导方针,并建议未来的研究。关键词:异步指令;远程教育;在线学习;课堂;在线;同步指令
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信